Re: [gentoo-dev] fixing dev-libs/icu c++11 bustage, testers wanted

2012-11-15 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 15/11/2012 21:13, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > -r1 disables C++11 completely, while -r2 just allows reverse > dependencies of icu not to support C++11, while possibly making icu use > C++11 features internally (I was asked by an upstream icu developer to > test that; if this still causes problem

Re: [gentoo-dev] fixing dev-libs/icu c++11 bustage, testers wanted

2012-11-15 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 11/14/12 9:09 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: > On 14/11/2012 21:02, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: >> My _limited_ testing seems to indicate it's "working". But if you >> people can just do your tests, that would be most welcome. Please >> report back either success or failure. > > What kind of test

[gentoo-dev] Re: Additional USE_EXPAND variables: E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF

2012-11-15 Thread Duncan
Ian Stakenvicius posted on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 16:08:55 -0500 as excerpted: > Portage doesn't do this (for me at least, 2.1.11.31 and previous); it > shows [USE_EXPAND]="possible1 possible2 possible3 ..."; no [use_expand_] > prefixed on -v output .. It was doing that for awhile. But then it switche

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Additional USE_EXPAND variables: E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF

2012-11-15 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 15/11/12 03:43 PM, Duncan wrote: > Thomas Sachau posted on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:45:16 +0100 as > excerpted: > >> Ben de Groot schrieb: >>> On 14 November 2012 05:13, Thomas Sachau >>> wrote: >>> Alexis Ballier schrieb: > - considering g

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Additional USE_EXPAND variables: E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF

2012-11-15 Thread Michael Mol
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:43 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Thomas Sachau posted on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:45:16 +0100 as excerpted: > >> Ben de Groot schrieb: >>> On 14 November 2012 05:13, Thomas Sachau wrote: >>> Alexis Ballier schrieb: > - considering gentoo generally uses e-

[gentoo-dev] Re: Additional USE_EXPAND variables: E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF

2012-11-15 Thread Duncan
Thomas Sachau posted on Thu, 15 Nov 2012 20:45:16 +0100 as excerpted: > Ben de Groot schrieb: >> On 14 November 2012 05:13, Thomas Sachau wrote: >> >>> Alexis Ballier schrieb: - considering gentoo generally uses e-prefixed names (econf, emake, etc.) maybe its wiser to name the variab

Re: [gentoo-dev] Additional USE_EXPAND variables: E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF

2012-11-15 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On 15/11/2012 11:45, Thomas Sachau wrote: > ok, so what about ENLIGHTENMENT_MODULES as USE_EXPANDED var? LGTM -- Diego Elio Pettenò — Flameeyes flamee...@flameeyes.eu — http://blog.flameeyes.eu/ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Additional USE_EXPAND variables: E_MODULES and E_MODULES_CONF

2012-11-15 Thread Thomas Sachau
Ben de Groot schrieb: > On 14 November 2012 05:13, Thomas Sachau wrote: > >> Alexis Ballier schrieb: >>> - considering gentoo generally uses e-prefixed names (econf, emake, >>> etc.) maybe its wiser to name the variables E17_* instead of only >>> E_*, or ENLIGHTENMENT_*, so that it makes the

[gentoo-dev] Ohloh Organizations - Gentoo Linux

2012-11-15 Thread Justin
Hi, does anybody like to setup an Organization[1] profile @ ohloh for Gentoo? justin [1] https://www.ohloh.net/orgs signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature