On 12/26/2012 05:39 PM, Kent Fredric wrote:
I know, it should be easy, and I'm probably making excuses, but it boils
down to
Well, it boils down to you needing an excuse ;)
1. People in Gentoo have asked me to/encouraged me to do the quizzes
2. I've tried several times
3. Still not there.
I can't vote, but I think we need to soften the policy.
2012/12/26 Sergey Popov pinkb...@gentoo.org
25.12.2012 18:30, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, Dec 25, 2012 at 7:09 AM, Torsten Veller t...@gentoo.org wrote:
Let's discuss the specific guideline for Perl modules. It's as
follows:
,-
On Fri, 28 Dec 2012 19:06:02 +0100
Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2012, 11:19:23 schrieb Michał Górny:
I don't think we can really avoid having the current 'base' profile,
and I don't think that we should even try doing that. As far as I can
see,
Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2012, 20:03:49 schrieben Sie:
The idea would be *for the transition period*: have an additional
directory
base5, which contains eapi=5, the stable mask files and nothing else.
After the transition period, these files are merged into the main profile
directory,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Why is your signature suddenly bad? It verifies in your 19:06 (GMT+1)
submission to gentoo-dev, but not in the most recent one -- 20:24 (GMT+1).
- --
Alexander
alexan...@plaimi.net
http://plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 28/12/12 20:29, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
Why is your signature suddenly bad? It verifies in your 19:06
(GMT+1) submission to gentoo-dev, but not in the most recent one --
20:24 (GMT+1).
Sorry. this was for Andreas, and should be to him
Known kmail bug imho. :(
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=306005
Am Freitag, 28. Dezember 2012, 20:29:25 schrieb Alexander Berntsen:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Why is your signature suddenly bad? It verifies in your 19:06 (GMT+1)
submission to gentoo-dev, but not
On 2012.12.27 22:13, William Hubbs wrote:
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 03:14:37PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
Something I don't like about this whole debate is that it tends to
come off as I've never run an initramfs and darn it I want to keep
it
that way. Gentoo has always been a
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.orgwrote:
2) Deprecate the 10.0 profiles NOW by removing them from profiles.desc and
putting the new 13.0 profiles there. This has absolutely no effect on
running
installations.
3) Make a news item about removal of 10.0
On Thursday 27 December 2012 17:13:56 William Hubbs wrote:
Another concern I've heard says that we shouldn't do this on linux
because gentoo *bsd doesn't do it. I don't see that as relevant
because ebuilds can be smart enough to test whether they are being
emerged on Linux or *BSD.
+1
-mike
10 matches
Mail list logo
