Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC 4.6 stabilization

2013-01-08 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Il 07/01/2013 17:13, Richard Yao ha scritto: On 01/06/2013 08:22 PM, Ryan Hill wrote: This is way past due so I'd like to get 4.6 into stable. There are hardly any blockers on bug #418383 which makes me go ?!, so if anyone knows of any issues please let us know. We probably should not

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please guys use checkpath in init scripts

2013-01-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 07 January 2013 15:52:40 Alec Warner wrote: On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 8:30 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: I just gave a quick look at the init scripts installed on the tinderbox, and the amount of them that use mkdir to create the directories in /run and similar is astounding.

Re: [gentoo-dev] DNSSEC (w/ DLV) live on *.dev.gentoo.org

2013-01-08 Thread Sven Vermeulen
On Sun, Jan 06, 2013 at 10:01:00PM -0600, Doug Goldstein wrote: On Sun, Jan 6, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: Just a heads up, DNSSEC is now live on *.dev.gentoo.org hosts. So for those that had to look up some or all of what Robin mentioned, I'll summarize

[gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.6 stabilization

2013-01-08 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 08 Jan 2013 10:50:32 +0100 viv...@gmail.com viv...@gmail.com wrote: We probably should not stabilize on ARM until the following is fixed: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=401561 Other architectures are probably okay. What about jumping straight to 4.7.2 do you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?

2013-01-08 Thread Douglas Freed
On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: The CVS keyword expansion causes the ebuild digest to mutate during the commit. If we repoman could predict correctly emulate the CVS keywords expansion on the client side, then it could generate a correct Manifest in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?

2013-01-08 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/08/2013 11:24 PM, Douglas Freed wrote: On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: The CVS keyword expansion causes the ebuild digest to mutate during the commit. If we repoman could predict correctly emulate the CVS keywords expansion on the client side, then it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?

2013-01-08 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/08/2013 11:36 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 01/08/2013 11:24 PM, Douglas Freed wrote: On Thu, Jan 3, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: The CVS keyword expansion causes the ebuild digest to mutate during the commit. If we repoman could predict correctly emulate the CVS

[gentoo-dev] Re: Should portage tree CVS impose a commit moratorium during snapshot creation?

2013-01-08 Thread Duncan
Zac Medico posted on Tue, 08 Jan 2013 23:36:59 -0800 as excerpted: Thought: Do the CVS keyword expansion in repoman, and then feed the expanded file to CVS for commit. This gives you a fixed file, which you can then generate your manifest against. Yeah, I guess that will work, if we