... if it is used in the ebuild?
It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 19 February 2013 13:10, Thomas Kahle to...@gentoo.org wrote:
... if it is used in the ebuild?
It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere?
Cheers,
Thomas
--
Thomas Kahle
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/
No you should not. It is a system package for every arch because it's
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:10:33 +0100
Thomas Kahle to...@gentoo.org wrote:
... if it is used in the ebuild?
It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere?
Cheers,
Thomas
Gnu sed version 4 is guaranteed by pms [1]
[1] http://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/5/pms.html#x1-12500011.3.1
Hi thomas, @all:
Thanks for bring up this for discussion..
I think 'embedded' profile have only one sys-apps/busybox as system
package,
but seems this profile haven't updated for long time, and may become
obsolete..
Dennis
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 9:10 PM, Thomas Kahle to...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013 14:10:33 +0100
Thomas Kahle to...@gentoo.org wrote:
... if it is used in the ebuild?
It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere?
No. sed is required by POSIX, so it shall always be there.
Additionally, it's provided by PMS too.
--
Best regards,
Michał
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2013 05:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013, Rick \Zero Chaos\ Farina wrote:
I would be very happy to have the licensing issues fixed, it looks
like it won't be fun, however I was originally told that redist was
a required
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 00:02:33 + (UTC)
Mike Frysinger (vapier) vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
+ 07 Jan 2013; Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org profiles.desc:
+ Mark s390 profiles stable.
+
06 Jan 2013; Justin Bronder jsbron...@gentoo.org package.mask:
Remove net-nntp/sabnzbd mask,
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:10 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote:
... if it is used in the ebuild?
It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere?
Cheers,
Thomas
Only if the pkg is also a system package. I recently ran into a problem
running a catalyst build because portage-utils did
On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote:
The key rotation as described in RiseUp best practices should be a very
rare occurrence. Each dev is going to run it at most once.
Some material I read recommended doing a key rotation every 6 months,
which I did for
2013/2/19 Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:10 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote:
... if it is used in the ebuild?
It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere?
Cheers,
Thomas
Only if the pkg is also a system package. I recently ran into a problem
running a
On 02/19/2013 07:21 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote:
On Tue, 2013-02-19 at 14:10 +0100, Thomas Kahle wrote:
... if it is used in the ebuild?
It is a system package here on amd64, but is it everywhere?
Cheers,
Thomas
Only if the pkg is also a system package. I recently ran into a problem
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 00:02:33 + (UTC)
Mike Frysinger (vapier) vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
[...]
+ 07 Jan 2013; Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org profiles.desc:
+ Mark s390 profiles stable.
+
06 Jan 2013; Justin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Just some quick thoughts on this:
2. root key signing subkey of EITHER: 2.1. DSA, 1024 or 2048 bits
2.2. RSA, =2048 bits
I don't really agree. From your own link
(https://we.riseup.net/riseuplabs+paow/openpgp-best-practices#dont-use-pgp-mit-edu):
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 01:34:57AM +0100, Stefan Behte wrote:
2. root key signing subkey of EITHER: 2.1. DSA, 1024 or 2048 bits
2.2. RSA, =2048 bits
...
1024 DSA keys seem pretty short to me. Surely it might be inconvenient
for some (2-3? please write a mail here!) people with smart cards.
Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina posted on Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:18:39 -0500 as
excerpted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2013 05:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013, Rick \Zero Chaos\ Farina wrote:
I would be very happy to have the licensing issues fixed, it
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 8:43 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote:
Rick \Zero_Chaos\ Farina posted on Tue, 19 Feb 2013 09:18:39 -0500 as
excerpted:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/17/2013 05:04 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Sun, 17 Feb 2013, Rick \Zero Chaos\ Farina
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:12 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2013 at 01:34:57AM +0100, Stefan Behte wrote:
2. root key signing subkey of EITHER: 2.1. DSA, 1024 or 2048 bits
2.2. RSA, =2048 bits
...
1024 DSA keys seem pretty short to me. Surely it might be
On Tue, 19 Feb 2013, Alec Warner wrote:
Lets not re-invent the wheel here:
Debian has free and non-free packages.
http://packages.debian.org/sid/firmware-linux
# free copyright
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/f/firmware-free/firmware-free_3.2/firmware-linux-free.copyright
Hello
For some time I am running portage-2.1.x with preserve-libs enabled to
test it and try to prevent revdep-rebuild usage. Until now, I haven't
had any problems with it, but I started to test it after being running
udev-19x for a long time. Yesterday, my father mailed me because he got
udev
On 02/19/2013 12:12 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
For some time I am running portage-2.1.x with preserve-libs enabled to
test it and try to prevent revdep-rebuild usage. Until now, I haven't
had any problems with it, but I started to test it after being running
udev-19x for a long time.
20 matches
Mail list logo
