Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH multilib.eclass] Distinguish between unset and empty variables when restoring.

2013-04-21 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Saturday 20 April 2013 11:42:42 Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 02:10:20 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Saturday 20 April 2013 01:12:20 Michał Górny wrote: > > > for v in CHOST CBUILD AS CC CXX LD PKG_CONFIG_{LIBDIR,PATH} ; do > > > > > > vv="

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2013-04-21 23h59 UTC

2013-04-21 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2013-04-21 23h59 UTC. Removals: media-sound/alsa-firmware 2013-04-16 05:16:28 ssuominen sys-kernel/linuxwacom-module2013-04-21 20:14:24 hwoarang Additions: sys-firmware/alsa

[gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPAND: CLAWS_MAIL_PLUGINS

2013-04-21 Thread Christian Faulhammer
Hello everybody, the upcoming Claws Mail release will have no separation between internal plugins (stuff that is built on mail-client/claws-mail with USE="crypt bogofilter") and external ones (all packages mail-client/claws-mail-*) anymore. All are now integrated, which would mean 21 additional US

Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: emul-linux-x86-xlibs deps being replaced in gx86

2013-04-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to give you a heads up and explanation on what I'm doing > today. > > I'm in the process of converting emul-linux-x86-xlibs dependencies > in gx86 with any-of dependencies supporting both emul-linux and split > multilib packa

Re: [gentoo-dev] FYI: emul-linux-x86-xlibs deps being replaced in gx86

2013-04-21 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 21:43:04 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > 1. well, the deps aren't that 100% awesome in EAPI<5 with paludis. It > may not enforce USE-deps correctly, but a global ABI_X86 setting plus > @world rebuild will make it work fine. but anyway -- whenever > possible, please try to migrate p

[gentoo-dev] FYI: libpng16 break showfoto (digikam) png save

2013-04-21 Thread viv...@gmail.com
Hi Samuli, while you're at it do you know what changed between 1.5 and 1.6 in ICC/color profiles land? In short digikam is now unable to save png files, I've yet do debug it so if there is some pointers that could shorten the discovery. The culprit seem to be "libpng error: profile 'icc': 1B0Ah:

[gentoo-dev] FYI: emul-linux-x86-xlibs deps being replaced in gx86

2013-04-21 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, I'd like to give you a heads up and explanation on what I'm doing today. I'm in the process of converting emul-linux-x86-xlibs dependencies in gx86 with any-of dependencies supporting both emul-linux and split multilib packages. The goal of that process is to allow peaceful co-existence of b

Re: [OT/NIT] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-21 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 17:05:49 +0200 Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:53:28 +0800 > Ben de Groot wrote: > > > > > > PS: btw, some hunks are weird in your commit, a locale issue ? > > > > > > > No, just a line in my vimrc that removes trailing whitespace. > > You should probably dis

Re: [OT/NIT] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-21 Thread Peter Stuge
Tom Wijsman wrote: > > > You should just convert the commit diff to not include space > > > changes. > > > > Tom, I don't understand what you mean here? Who should do the convert > > and why? > > It's a human error for both ends, it can thus be done on both sides. Hm, I'm not sure I follow. Whe

Re: [OT/NIT] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-21 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 18:00:42 +0200 Peter Stuge wrote: > > You should just convert the commit diff to not include space > > changes. > > Tom, I don't understand what you mean here? Who should do the convert > and why? It's a human error for both ends, it can thus be done on both sides. > Writin

Re: [OT/NIT] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-21 Thread Peter Stuge
Tom Wijsman wrote: > > > No, just a line in my vimrc that removes trailing whitespace. > > > > You should probably disable it or remove trailing whitespaces in a > > separate commit though. I agree strongly with this. > > Having functional changes mixed with whitespace/cosmetics in a > > single

Re: [OT/NIT] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-21 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 17:32:26 +0200 Tom Wijsman wrote: > On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 17:05:49 +0200 > Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:53:28 +0800 > > Ben de Groot wrote: > > > > > > > > PS: btw, some hunks are weird in your commit, a locale issue ? > > > > > > > > > > No, just a lin

Re: [OT/NIT] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-21 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 17:05:49 +0200 Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:53:28 +0800 > Ben de Groot wrote: > > > > > > PS: btw, some hunks are weird in your commit, a locale issue ? > > > > > > > No, just a line in my vimrc that removes trailing whitespace. > > > > You should probabl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-21 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 17:07:41 +0200 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Denis Dupeyron schrieb: > >> When someone asks about changing a package which someone else > >> maintains, I always suggest reporting a bug about it. Do you think > >> that is generally ok, or not the proper way to communica

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-21 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Denis Dupeyron schrieb: >> When someone asks about changing a package which someone else maintains, I >> always suggest reporting a bug about it. Do you think that is generally ok, >> or not the proper way to communicate? > > Exactly. Bugzilla is not a communication tool, > Communication is (in

[OT/NIT] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-21 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:53:28 +0800 Ben de Groot wrote: > > > > PS: btw, some hunks are weird in your commit, a locale issue ? > > > > No, just a line in my vimrc that removes trailing whitespace. > You should probably disable it or remove trailing whitespaces in a separate commit though. Having

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-21 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Sun, 21 Apr 2013 20:53:28 +0800 Ben de Groot wrote: > On 19 April 2013 21:30, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:16:32 + (UTC) > > "Ben de Groot (yngwin)" wrote: > > > > > Index: package.mask > > > === > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-21 Thread Denis Dupeyron
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 8:38 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > When someone asks about changing a package which someone else maintains, I > always suggest reporting a bug about it. Do you think that is generally ok, > or not the proper way to communicate? Exactly. Bugzilla is not a commun

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-21 Thread Denis Dupeyron
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 8:23 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > However, if somebody just commits something to your package, and it > causes you headaches, and they aren't committing to long-term > maintenance of the package, then yes, you can revert, etc. That's where you're wrong. You can revert if nece

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-21 Thread Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn
Denis Dupeyron schrieb: > I'm hoping this kind of immature and abrasive behaviours will not > propagate (notice the plural here). Yes, when you see a package being > actively maintained by somebody else you should absolutely not touch > it without talking to that person or team first. I fail to se

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-21 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:11 AM, Denis Dupeyron wrote: > But nobody owns anything in Gentoo. As a developer > you're not king of the hill but servant of the users. The only way to > make yourself more relevant is by doing a better job, not by barking > at the others to protect your territory. I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-21 Thread Denis Dupeyron
I'm hoping this kind of immature and abrasive behaviours will not propagate (notice the plural here). Yes, when you see a package being actively maintained by somebody else you should absolutely not touch it without talking to that person or team first. This is probably the single most important ru

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-21 Thread Ben de Groot
On 19 April 2013 21:30, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 09:16:32 + (UTC) > "Ben de Groot (yngwin)" wrote: > > > Index: package.mask > > === > > RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v > > retrieving

[gentoo-dev] Re: About src_test() in perl-modules

2013-04-21 Thread Torsten Veller
* Mikle Kolyada : > Lately, i saw many bugs like =dev-perl/${packagename}: fails test. Strange, I didn't. > Me just interested proper way to fix those bugs? I think it depends on the bug. So let's have a look at all "dev-perl" bugs in the last month: https://bugs.gentoo.org/buglist.cgi?short_de