El lun, 03-06-2013 a las 17:24 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
[...]
Yeah. The news item now advises the user that it's a good practice to
run revdep-rebuild anyway, just to be safe.
I would also suggest people to report bugs when they find cases not
catched by preserve-libs as they can be a real
On 06/03/2013 11:49 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 03-06-2013 a las 17:24 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
[...]
Yeah. The news item now advises the user that it's a good practice to
run revdep-rebuild anyway, just to be safe.
I would also suggest people to report bugs when they find cases not
Hello guys,
the app-dict team is almost-non existent altho it provides one of the most
core features for our daily desktop usage as without dictionaries and spell
checking we could not imagine much work nowdays.
So what is needed there:
aspell - all various bugs around, per language file
Hi folks,
somehow it happened that I'm listed as the only maintainer of
net-wireless/ipw3945d, net-wireless/ipw3945 and net-wireless/ipw3945-ucode. I'm
not an ebuild developer, I no longer use that hardware on a production machine,
and I believe that I switched that old laptop to iwl3945 years
On 4 June 2013 15:54, Jan Kundrát j...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi folks,
somehow it happened that I'm listed as the only maintainer of
net-wireless/ipw3945d, net-wireless/ipw3945 and net-wireless/ipw3945-ucode.
I'm not an ebuild developer, I no longer use that hardware on a production
machine, and
On Tuesday, 4 June 2013 17:02:33 CEST, Markos Chandras wrote:
Could you please open a bug so treecleaners can track this?
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=472296 it is. Thanks.
Cheers,
Jan
On 04/06/13 03:24, Zac Medico wrote:
Yeah. The news item now advises the user that it's a good practice to
run revdep-rebuild anyway, just to be safe.
And `revdep-rebuild --library libfoobar.so.0` is still useful,
unless Portage can replace targeted --library calls too?
Just saying I'm not
Hi Luca,
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 12:35:29AM +0200, Luca Barbato wrote:
Again you should read the whole thread, please do, the whole eselect
init stuff should stay opt-in for the time being so all this discussion
is close to pointless.
Can we please make this remain opt-in always? I too would
On 06/04/2013 09:20 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 04/06/13 03:24, Zac Medico wrote:
Yeah. The news item now advises the user that it's a good practice to
run revdep-rebuild anyway, just to be safe.
And `revdep-rebuild --library libfoobar.so.0` is still useful,
This is for a ABI change
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote:
This is for a ABI change without bumping the soname? It's possible to
trigger rebuilds for that case by using sub-slots and slot-operators.
Or you could choose a longer-term solution like firebombing the
upstream
It lacks a maintainer for a long time, also has some opened bugs and I
am unsure if it's still needed. I am not using it for months and never
saw any problem, also, portage fixes .la files by itself, and paludis
people don't approve lafilefixer.
Do we still need it?
On 05/06/13 00:09, Pacho Ramos wrote:
It lacks a maintainer for a long time, also has some opened bugs and I
am unsure if it's still needed. I am not using it for months and never
saw any problem, also, portage fixes .la files by itself, and paludis
people don't approve lafilefixer.
Do we still
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/04/2013 04:56 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 4:51 PM, Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org
wrote:
This is for a ABI change without bumping the soname? It's
possible to trigger rebuilds for that case by using sub-slots and
13 matches
Mail list logo
