# Torsten Veller (08 Jan 2013)
# Mask dev-perl/Class-MOP. It was merge with dev-perl/Moose-2.
# Now as the last arch stabilized Moose-2, dev-perl/Class-MOP will be
removed.
# bug #350612
dev-perl/Class-MOP
--
Best reagrds, Mikle Kolyada.
Gentoo Linux Developer
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:33:21 -0700
Zac Medico wrote:
> On 06/25/2013 07:47 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:40:38 -0400
> > Michael Sterrett wrote:
> >
> >> repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss.
> >
> >
> > wont this disable important regular checks also?
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/25/2013 07:57 PM, Roy Bamford wrote:
> On 2013.06.23 22:30, Pavlos Ratis wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Everyday we talk to each other about different kind of things
>> related to Gentoo. IRC and MLs are the primary way of our
>> communication, but
On 06/25/2013 07:47 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:40:38 -0400
> Michael Sterrett wrote:
>
>> repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss.
>
>
> wont this disable important regular checks also?
The -I (--ignore-masked) option only disables dependency checks for
maske
On 2013.06.23 22:30, Pavlos Ratis wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Everyday we talk to each other about different kind of things related
> to Gentoo. IRC and MLs are the primary way of our communication, but
> this is only a text-based communication. I think sometimes it would
> be
> better to escape from
On 26/06/2013 01:09, Egg Plant wrote:
According to Pavlos Ratis proposal, it will be another channel of
communication. I am not protesting to setup an unofficial channel there.
I am fearing that it will gradually become an avenue for talent show, similar
to other binary distros. That is why I
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:09 AM, Egg Plant wrote:
> The resourcefull developers/users can meet each other at Gentoo Miniconf and
> similar other gatherings in real world. That will make us more human.
I don't think this is really sufficient. As far as I can tell most
people attend such things b
- Original Message -
> From: Michael Palimaka
>
> On 25/06/2013 22:42, Egg Plant wrote:
>> I don't know whether a new gentoo user like me have any say here, I
> would like to point out some problems about this proposal !
>>
>> 2. Gentoo is not backed by any public invested company o
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:40:38 -0400
Michael Sterrett wrote:
> repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss.
wont this disable important regular checks also?
foo is masked by package.mask, bar depends on foo. repoman -I wont
catch a broken dep in bar.
IMHO it should do the -I check in addi
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
> These are all good reasons to not use Hangouts. Fortunately, there was
> nothing in the proposal to suggest that it will be required for anyone, or
> that it will replace any existing source of information. Therefore anyone
> who chooses n
On 25/06/2013 22:42, Egg Plant wrote:
I don't know whether a new gentoo user like me have any say here, I would like
to point out some problems about this proposal !
1. Video requires high bandwidth internet, so useless in developing countries,
where even today you can not think of 24x7 intern
- Original Message -
> From: Michael Palimaka
>
> On 24/06/2013 07:30, Pavlos Ratis wrote:
>> That's why I'd like to propose Gentoo Hangouts. Gentoo Hangouts
> will
>> be Google+ video Hangouts(video calls) held by teams or developers
>> independent of a team. The main goal is to ha
12 matches
Mail list logo
