On 25/07/2013 05:17, Michał Górny wrote:
Actually per PMS you are required to revbump (and therefore require
upgrade on users' side) whenever you change the deps and don't expect
to add a new version soon enough.
Can you please provide a link/reference to that part? I am interested in
reading
Alex Alexander wrote:
Hello,
Please revbump an ebuild after changing its USE dependencies.
Using net-p2p/transmission as an example, it used to depend on
dev-qt/qtgui:4=[dbus]
however, qtgui lost the dbus useflag, so the dependency was changed to
dev-qt/qtgui:4=[dbus(+)]
without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Shall we revisit that, and try to make portage behave more correctly,
even if it means more revbumps / rebuilding?
Just set EMERGE_DEFAULT_DEPS=--dynamic-deps=n in make.conf if you'd
like to test it.
What (if anything) does that break or
About one month ago I've filed
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474358 about modernizing
toolchain.eclass by creating new toolchain-r1.eclass and migrating
ebuilds using it to the new eclass.
Please see attachments and review the code.
One issue has already been raised, and it's
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
Then there is a question whether toolchain packages should use EAPI 5,
EAPI=5 would be useful for both the mips team (for bug 477956) and for
catalyst builders (for subslot dependencies when dealing with binary
On 07/25/2013 08:29 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
Shall we revisit that, and try to make portage behave more correctly,
even if it means more revbumps / rebuilding?
Just set EMERGE_DEFAULT_DEPS=--dynamic-deps=n in make.conf if you'd
like to test it.
What (if anything) does that
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 07/25/2013 01:28 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 07/25/2013 08:29 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
Shall we revisit that, and try to make portage behave more correctly,
even if it means more revbumps / rebuilding?
Just set
On 07/25/2013 11:29 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
On 07/25/2013 01:28 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 07/25/2013 08:29 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote:
Shall we revisit that, and try to make portage behave more correctly,
even if it means more revbumps / rebuilding?
Just set
Rich Freeman wrote:
Roy Bamford wrote:
The open floor is a part of the openness and approachability of the
council. Its 60 seconds well spent, even if nobody says anything.
The concern that was raised was that when it does get used it is rare
for anything to get accomplished. The desire
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:26:48 -0700
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
About one month ago I've filed
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474358 about modernizing
toolchain.eclass by creating new toolchain-r1.eclass and migrating
ebuilds using it to the new eclass.
Please
El jue, 25-07-2013 a las 22:30 -0600, Ryan Hill escribió:
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 09:26:48 -0700
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
About one month ago I've filed
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=474358 about modernizing
toolchain.eclass by creating new toolchain-r1.eclass
This question comes to my mind every time a developer decides to
drop/add a USE flag to ebuilds like gcc/webkit-gtk/libreoffice...
I think that we should have a file (like used for category movements) to
let PM know how to handle this situation.
For example,
category/foo-1.0 has a gnome USE
On 07/25/2013 11:54 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
This question comes to my mind every time a developer decides to
drop/add a USE flag to ebuilds like gcc/webkit-gtk/libreoffice...
I think that we should have a file (like used for category movements) to
let PM know how to handle this situation.
El jue, 25-07-2013 a las 12:00 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 07/25/2013 11:54 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
This question comes to my mind every time a developer decides to
drop/add a USE flag to ebuilds like gcc/webkit-gtk/libreoffice...
I think that we should have a file (like used for
On 07/25/2013 12:14 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El jue, 25-07-2013 a las 12:00 -0700, Zac Medico escribió:
On 07/25/2013 11:54 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
This question comes to my mind every time a developer decides to
drop/add a USE flag to ebuilds like gcc/webkit-gtk/libreoffice...
I think that we
El vie, 26-07-2013 a las 02:47 +0300, Alex Alexander escribió:
I once half-implemented something like this but never got to finish
it, I'll try to dig up my code and check out its state.
I recall using updates/ to tell portage what happened, which then
updated the VDB to reflect the new
16 matches
Mail list logo