Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-06 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 12/03/2013 04:11 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > I would like to add a virtual/network-manager package to @system which > has the following rdepend settings: > > RDEPEND=" || ( > net-misc/netifrc > >=sys-apps/openrc-0.12[newnet] > net-

Re: [gentoo-dev] =net-fs/samba-4* vs. dev-libs/openssl[kerberos]

2013-12-06 Thread Timo Gurr
There's also another package which suffers the same problem, sys-auth/sssd hard-requires mit-krb5 so it can't be used together with samba4 as well. -- Timo Gurr

Re: [gentoo-dev] =net-fs/samba-4* vs. dev-libs/openssl[kerberos]

2013-12-06 Thread Eray Aslan
On 06/12/13 19:14, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > Now for a better solution: make samba also work with MIT Kerberos, and > make OpenSSL work with Heimdal. That's a big effort. If we decide not to serve the bundled heimdal libraries, we can declare samba4 server components and openssl[kerberos] unsu

Re: [gentoo-dev] =net-fs/samba-4* vs. dev-libs/openssl[kerberos]

2013-12-06 Thread Diego Elio Pettenò
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 3:24 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: > The bug reporter suggests to use bundled heimdal from samba-4 which I > would like to avoid if possible. > If the libraries were to expose the symbols of the embedded heimdal, it would solve the obvious build problem and create a bigger one at

Re: [gentoo-dev] =net-fs/samba-4* vs. dev-libs/openssl[kerberos]

2013-12-06 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 12/6/13, 7:24 AM, Lars Wendler wrote: > The bug reporter suggests to use bundled heimdal from samba-4 which I > would like to avoid if possible. > If anyone knows some better solution please speak up. It is highly > appreciated. It sounds ugly, but I generally lean towards pragmatic solutions:

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-06 Thread Ben Kohler
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > > > If the stage3 could include a dhcp client and (ideally imo) netifrc, > even though they aren't a part of @system, that would help prevent the > "stuff missing, damnit, have to reboot back to livecd" cycle. Since > it isn't part of @wor

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-06 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 04/12/13 08:56 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, Dec 04, 2013 at 07:17:45PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 6:45 PM, Patrick Lauer >> wrote: >>> On 12/05/2013 05:30 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 4:25 PM

[gentoo-dev] =net-fs/samba-4* vs. dev-libs/openssl[kerberos]

2013-12-06 Thread Lars Wendler
Hi list, in [1] we got a bug where was pointed out that it is impossible to use =net-fs/samba-4* on a system which has dev-libs/openssl[kerberos] installed. Long story short, samba-4 hard requires app-crypt/heimdal while openssl[kerberos] hard requires app-crypt/mit-krb5. Of course both packages