Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-13 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
On Sat, 7 Dec 2013, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sat, Dec 7, 2013 at 12:52 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: Honestly, I'm not really sure why anyone would want to make stage3 less functional than it already is but honestly net isn't something I'm ready to give up just yet. It isn't about ma

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-13 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
On Tue, 10 Dec 2013, William Hubbs wrote: My issue with what we are currently doing is not whether we have a default network provider in the stages or not, but it is just that the netifrc use flag on OpenRC is bogus. OpenRC doesn't need netifrc for any reason. William, the "push" for the use

Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook?

2013-12-13 Thread Dale
Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 2:25 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> On 12/10/2013 09:18 PM, Paul B. Henson wrote: >>> I'd say go one step further and get rid of vixie-cron completely, is >>> there anything it does that cronie can't do as well or better? >> Is cronie a drop-in replace

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC

2013-12-13 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 07:53:59PM +, Duncan wrote: > William Hubbs posted on Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:23:07 -0600 as excerpted: > > > There are reasons to run the rc binary directly; this is how you should > > be changing runlevels. > > ??? > > init 9 (or telinit 9, yes, I have a runlevel 9, b

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC

2013-12-13 Thread Duncan
William Hubbs posted on Fri, 13 Dec 2013 11:23:07 -0600 as excerpted: > There are reasons to run the rc binary directly; this is how you should > be changing runlevels. ??? init 9 (or telinit 9, yes, I have a runlevel 9, basic, just gpm as it happens) isn't appropriate? Of course, with gento

Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook?

2013-12-13 Thread Markos Chandras
On 12/13/2013 04:53 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 17:08 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: >> Sergey Popov wrote: >> Last time I checked, vixie-cron upstream was died > > If vixie-cron upstream is dead as you say Define dead? >>> >>> Bugs are not fixed for a very long

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC

2013-12-13 Thread William Hubbs
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:59:35AM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Alexander Berntsen > wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > On 11/12/13 21:41, William Hubbs wrote: > >> My thought is to rename our "rc" to "openrc", since that would

Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook?

2013-12-13 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 17:08 +0100, Peter Stuge wrote: > Sergey Popov wrote: > > >>> Last time I checked, vixie-cron upstream was died > > >> > > >> If vixie-cron upstream is dead as you say > > > > > > Define dead? > > > > Bugs are not fixed for a very long time, no answers on private > > e-mails

Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook?

2013-12-13 Thread Ben Kohler
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: > Sergey Popov wrote: > > >>> Last time I checked, vixie-cron upstream was died > > >> > > >> If vixie-cron upstream is dead as you say > > > > > > Define dead? > > > > Bugs are not fixed for a very long time, no answers on private > > e-mails

Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook?

2013-12-13 Thread Peter Stuge
Sergey Popov wrote: > >>> Last time I checked, vixie-cron upstream was died > >> > >> If vixie-cron upstream is dead as you say > > > > Define dead? > > Bugs are not fixed for a very long time, no answers on private > e-mails or in maillists. Define very long time? //Peter pgpf3lhVFAsOu.pgp

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC

2013-12-13 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 10:46 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > On 11/12/13 21:41, William Hubbs wrote: >> My thought is to rename our "rc" to "openrc", since that would be >> unique. > orc is shorter and more punny (nice excuse for designing an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Recommend cronie instead of vixie-cron in handbook?

2013-12-13 Thread Sergey Popov
12.12.2013 01:07, Peter Stuge пишет: > Markos Chandras wrote: >>> Last time I checked, vixie-cron upstream was died >> >> If vixie-cron upstream is dead as you say > > Define dead? > > > //Peter > Bugs are not fixed for a very long time, no answers on private e-mails or in maillists. -- Best

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC

2013-12-13 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 13/12/13 13:31, Samuli Suominen wrote: > orc is dev-lang/orc, with binaries like orc-bugreport That's fine. There is no binary, orc. > as said, with tab completion, orc-* would just get mixed up with > binaries from dev-lang/orc Tab-completing

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: renaming "rc" binary in OpenRC

2013-12-13 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 12/12/13 17:46, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > On 11/12/13 21:41, William Hubbs wrote: > > My thought is to rename our "rc" to "openrc", since that would be > > unique. > orc is shorter and more punny (nice excuse for designing an orcish cow > mascot). > orc is dev-lang/orc, with binaries like or