# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (28 Dec 2013)
# Replaced by 'emerge @module-rebuild' set in Portage itself.
# Removal in 30 days, see http://bugs.gentoo.org/410739
sys-kernel/module-rebuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 12/26/2013 01:27 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 26 Dec 2013 14:25:04 +0100 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org
wrote:
That is funny that you mention cleaning up. I remember last
time when you broke 8 ebuilds at once because you just trusted
That's what I call ignoring the rest. You do not communicate,
you do not file bugs, you just go and do stuff.
That kind of behaviour is what the QA team is supposed to be able
to address. You should raise this issue with them rather than
accusing each other on the lists.
I
On 12/28/2013 03:44 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
That's what I call ignoring the rest. You do not communicate,
you do not file bugs, you just go and do stuff.
That kind of behaviour is what the QA team is supposed to be able
to address. You should raise this issue with them rather than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 15:11:41 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
I feel that this thread is a sign that
there is a problem on how the new QA communicates problems with the
developers that cause them.
This thread can also be perceived
On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 15:44:45 +
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
It certainly isn't to the person who caused the problem
Hard to tell from skimming the context, but in his first mail there is
an acknowledgment that there was previous communication between both
persons; it just
The discussion is based on some questions that are hard to agree on:
1. How much of a problem is an unused USE flag in metadata.xml?
Cosmetic issue. No functional impact.
2. Should such repoman warnings be fixed? By whom? When? How?
Yes. You see it, you fix it.
Not fixing cosmetic
On Sat, 28 Dec 2013 18:26:47 +0100
Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote:
The discussion is based on some questions that are hard to agree on:
1. How much of a problem is an unused USE flag in metadata.xml?
Cosmetic issue. No functional impact.
This is a description of an unused USE
On 12/28/2013 04:44 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 12/28/2013 03:44 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
That's what I call ignoring the rest. You do not communicate,
you do not file bugs, you just go and do stuff.
That kind of behaviour is what the QA team is supposed to be able
to address. You
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
static-libs - Build static libraries
This can be ambiguous as some packages (like SDL2 - after I apply the
necessary patch) have libraries that are not supposed to be dynamic at
all.
An alternative description would be:
static-libs - Build static
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 08:25:19PM +1100, Michael Palimaka wrote:
On 31/10/2013 09:10, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
dev-util/checkbashisms
As described in bug #426828, this package currently uses an abandoned
upstream, with a much more recent version maintained by Debian. I'd like
to, at a
Hi all,
As a followup on my October email, I'm dropping some more packages.
In October, I was still at 300+, now I'm at 195, and I think the ~60 odd
below should also go out to other developers.
The prior email primarily covered packages where I was there maintainer,
and there was no herd to
On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 8:19 AM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi all,
As a followup on my October email, I'm dropping some more packages.
In October, I was still at 300+, now I'm at 195, and I think the ~60 odd
below should also go out to other developers.
The prior email
13 matches
Mail list logo
