Re: [gentoo-dev] Catalyst news item - v2

2014-02-03 Thread Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: On Thu, 30 Jan 2014, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote: Here's v2 of the news item. I tried to address the concern with showing this news item to anyone with catalyst and not only running catalyst-. If anyone insists, I don't mind rest

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] All profile directories going EAPI=5

2014-02-03 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 11:42 AM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote: > I'm more worried about how long it takes me to learn > how to news than the actual second the snapshot is taken. Just read the GLEP and post some text to the list. Bikeshedding will occur. If you need help committing it just pin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] All profile directories going EAPI=5

2014-02-03 Thread Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/01/2014 01:42 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Sat, Feb 1, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina > wrote: >> >> I see exactly zero downside to doing this, so if whoever is going to >> actually do the editing of the profiles would like to work w

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/certifi and dev-python/mozrunner

2014-02-03 Thread Mike Gilbert
# Mike Gilbert (26 Jan 2014) # Python library that has no reverse deps. Removal in 30 days. dev-python/certifi # Mike Gilbert (29 Jan 2014) # I suspect this package is not used. If you are using it, please contact me. # Otherwise, it will be removed in 30 days. dev-python/mozrunner dev-python/m

[gentoo-dev] Last Rite: x11-misc/slimlock

2014-02-03 Thread Aaron W. Swenson
The screen lock program x11-misc/slimlock has been masked for removal. slimlock has been merged into its inspirator, x11-misc/slim, as of 2013-10-01. Install >=x11-misc/slim-1.3.6 to get the most recent improvements/enhancements of slimlock. -- Mr. Aaron W. Swenson Gentoo Linux Developer PostgreS

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: dropping redundant stable keywords

2014-02-03 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Mon, 3 Feb 2014 06:25:24 + "Steven J. Long" wrote: > Closing those bugs as WONTFIX is more work, and in some cases the bugs > would be justified, if the user is on the slow arch in question. They are less work; since it lets the slower arches move their work to bugs of important packages