[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/wmbattery: ChangeLog wmbattery-2.42.ebuild wmbattery-2.19-r1.ebuild

2014-02-11 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 11/02/14 11:42, Bernard Cafarelli (voyageur) wrote: voyageur14/02/11 09:42:47 Modified: ChangeLog Added:wmbattery-2.42.ebuild Removed: wmbattery-2.19-r1.ebuild Log: Version bump, adds upower support (Portage version:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting

2014-02-11 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: Looks interesting. It reminds me somewhat of autodep[1]. Interesting - does this work? I don't see it in portage. One of those ideas I've always wanted to implement is to create a portage hook/patch that looks at

[gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting

2014-02-11 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 02/11/2014 11:34 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 1:56 AM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: Looks interesting. It reminds me somewhat of autodep[1]. Interesting - does this work? I don't see it in portage. It used to work pretty well, but the bundled

Re: [gentoo-dev] mbox -- looks sort of interesting

2014-02-11 Thread justin
On 11/02/14 01:36, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: Hey folks, Late night clicking-while-drooling, I came across something a few minutes ago that mildly piqued my interest -- mbox http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/mbox/. It's a sandbox that uses a combination of ptrace and seccomp bpf; neither ours nor

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting

2014-02-11 Thread Rich Freeman
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: On 02/11/2014 11:34 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: One of those ideas I've always wanted to implement is to create a portage hook/patch that looks at the dependencies for the package being built and configures sandbox to

[gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting

2014-02-11 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 02/12/2014 01:03 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: On 02/11/2014 11:34 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: One of those ideas I've always wanted to implement is to create a portage hook/patch that looks at the dependencies for the

Re: [gentoo-dev] mbox -- looks sort of interesting

2014-02-11 Thread Wulf C. Krueger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Jason, On 11.02.2014 01:36, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: It's a sandbox that uses a combination of ptrace and seccomp bpf; neither ours nor exherbo's uses both of these together. Actually, sydbox, Exherbo's sandbox *does* use both together. -

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/htmlview

2014-02-11 Thread Dion Moult
# Dion Moult mo...@gentoo.org (12 Feb 2014) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Removed as this was a compatibility hack # package, with equivalent functionality already implemented elsewhere (xdg- open # and co). (bug #480522) www-client/htmlview -- Dion Moult

[gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-11 Thread Alex Alexander
Hello fellow developers, In the first meeting of the new QA team, we discussed the state of the gtk{,2,3} USE flags in the main tree. [0] In its current state, USE=gtk means gtk2. The Gnome team is trying to change this into the most recent gtk version (it is a work in progress). Unfortunately,

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-11 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 12/02/14 00:39, Alex Alexander wrote: Hello fellow developers, In the first meeting of the new QA team, we discussed the state of the gtk{,2,3} USE flags in the main tree. [0] In its current state, USE=gtk means gtk2. The Gnome team is trying to change this into the most recent gtk

Re: [gentoo-dev] mbox -- looks sort of interesting

2014-02-11 Thread Jason A. Donenfeld
On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Wulf C. Krueger w...@mailstation.de wrote: On 11.02.2014 01:36, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: It's a sandbox that uses a combination of ptrace and seccomp bpf; neither ours nor exherbo's uses both of these together. Actually, sydbox, Exherbo's sandbox *does* use

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-11 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Thanks for attaching link to team's policy which tries to lift any kind of ambiguities people may have for what concerns gnome team's packages, I hope it proved useful in your discussions. Le mercredi 12 février 2014 à 00:39 +0200, Alex Alexander a écrit : Hello fellow developers, In the

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/wmbattery: ChangeLog wmbattery-2.42.ebuild wmbattery-2.19-r1.ebuild

2014-02-11 Thread Bernard Cafarelli
Le Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:09:14 +0200 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org a écrit: On 11/02/14 11:42, Bernard Cafarelli (voyageur) wrote: voyageur14/02/11 09:42:47 Modified: ChangeLog Added:wmbattery-2.42.ebuild Removed:

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-11 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Samuli Suominen wrote: USE=gtk3 is valid only for libraries when it's not easy to split/slot as a temporary flag. Applications should simply pick one, the latest one that works, since anything else is obviously redudant. I don't see why applications should be treated

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-11 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 12/02/14 01:51, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Samuli Suominen wrote: USE=gtk3 is valid only for libraries when it's not easy to split/slot as a temporary flag. Applications should simply pick one, the latest one that works, since anything else is obviously redudant. I don't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in x11-plugins/wmbattery: ChangeLog wmbattery-2.42.ebuild wmbattery-2.19-r1.ebuild

2014-02-11 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 12/02/14 01:20, Bernard Cafarelli wrote: Le Tue, 11 Feb 2014 12:09:14 +0200 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org a écrit: On 11/02/14 11:42, Bernard Cafarelli (voyageur) wrote: voyageur14/02/11 09:42:47 Modified: ChangeLog Added:wmbattery-2.42.ebuild

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-11 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014, Samuli Suominen wrote: But applications is whole different story... The maintainer makes the decision which toolkit is used and best supported. If some application has initial port to gtk3, but still lacks some features the gtk2 version still had, then maintainer makes

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-11 Thread Chris Reffett
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/11/2014 06:13 PM, Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: Thanks for attaching link to team's policy which tries to lift any kind of ambiguities people may have for what concerns gnome team's packages, I hope it proved useful in your discussions.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules

2014-02-11 Thread Ryan Hill
On Mon, 10 Feb 2014 20:43:41 +0800 Patrick Lauer patr...@gentoo.org wrote: At the time EAPI 0 was in limbo as toolchain required it (What's the current status of toolchain on that?) GCC is now EAPI 2 except for gcc-apple and kgcc64. I'm going to deprecate EAPI 0 and 1 soon but need to give

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mbox -- looks sort of interesting

2014-02-11 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 01:36:01 +1100 Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: On 02/12/2014 01:03 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 7:39 AM, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: On 02/11/2014 11:34 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: One of those ideas I've always wanted

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-11 Thread Ryan Hill
On Tue, 11 Feb 2014 19:33:06 -0500 Chris Reffett creff...@gentoo.org wrote: This doesn't make sense to me at all. I can't see why slotted libraries can't just use USE flags to specify what toolkit they're built against, just like any other package in the tree (so, for example, a package that

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-11 Thread Pacho Ramos
El mar, 11-02-2014 a las 19:33 -0500, Chris Reffett escribió: [...] This doesn't make sense to me at all. I can't see why slotted libraries can't just use USE flags to specify what toolkit they're built against, just like any other package in the tree (so, for example, a package that needs

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: GTK USE flag situation (gtk, gtk2, gtk3; relevant to bug #420493)

2014-02-11 Thread Lars Wendler
Hi, On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 00:39:14 +0200 Alex Alexander wrote: Hello fellow developers, In the first meeting of the new QA team, we discussed the state of the gtk{,2,3} USE flags in the main tree. [0] In its current state, USE=gtk means gtk2. The Gnome team is trying to change this into the most