On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 01:28:55 +0100
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:59:58 +0100
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
And that can work without a problem if we have a mechanism
in place to relieve maintainers of those bugs.
Such mechanism could be to
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 11:41:57 +0100
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Assigning bugs so arch teams is cosmetic at best.
s|so|to|
While it was not explained here, the idea can also move the actual
maintenance of the ebuild to the arch team; such that it becomes the
arch team's
El sáb, 15-02-2014 a las 14:30 +0100, Jeroen Roovers escribió:
[...]
The only reasonable course of action is to start dropping stable
keywords for $ARCH, after a reasonable timeout. It gets tricky if this
involves removing many keywords on dependencies, but if that's what you
have to do to
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 8:30 AM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 11:41:57 +0100
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
While it was not explained here, the idea can also move the actual
maintenance of the ebuild to the arch team; such that it becomes the
arch team's
# Ulrich Müller u...@gentoo.org (15 Feb 2014)
# Doesn't appear to work with Emacs 24.
# Last upstream release in 2002.
# Masked for removal in 30 days, bug 501412.
app-emacs/alt-font-menu
# Ulrich Müller u...@gentoo.org (15 Feb 2014)
# Included with Emacs since version 23.
# cperl-mode-6.2 does
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 17:13:27 -0600
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 11:02:49AM -0500, Emery Hemingway wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 13:30:10 +0100
Jan Matejka y...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:59:16 -0600
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org
# Ulrich Müller u...@gentoo.org (15 Feb 2014)
# Support library for app-emacs/prime-el, which is masked
# for removal itself. No other reverse dependencies.
# Masked for removal in 30 days, bug 501426.
app-emacs/mell
pgpndeMHQ9ejG.pgp
Description: PGP signature
JAD == Jason A Donenfeld zx...@gentoo.org writes:
UM Should we allow pictures if the image file format is a text file?
JAD I think we should not. Even if you can open it in a text editor,
JAD you can't read it or interact with it in the same way that you
JAD can a text-based patch.
That's not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 13/02/14 16:12, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
Should we allow pictures if the image file format is a text file?
Rather than having a hard rule for allowing or disallowing image
files, we should evaluate the intention of a file. If it make sense to
edit
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 12:48:44AM +0100, yac wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 11:02:49 -0500
Emery Hemingway em...@vfemail.net wrote:
The default GOROOT that go looks at for base libraries seems to be
compiled in so this should be pretty easy, like python but simplier.
I'm not sure what you
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 11:41:57AM +0100, Tom Wijsman wrote:
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 01:28:55 +0100
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, 14 Feb 2014 19:59:58 +0100
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
And that can work without a problem if we have a mechanism
in place to
On Sat, Feb 15, 2014 at 02:30:21PM +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 11:41:57 +0100
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Assigning bugs so arch teams is cosmetic at best.
s|so|to|
While it was not explained here, the idea can also move the actual
maintenance of the
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:53:22 -0600
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
The problem with this is, what if it is more than one arch team? Which
one do you assign it to?
Oh the fun we had in the past when bugs got assigned to one arch team
with a few others CC'd and no maintainer in sight
On Sun, Feb 16, 2014 at 12:37:03AM +0100, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:53:22 -0600
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
The problem with this is, what if it is more than one arch team? Which
one do you assign it to?
Oh the fun we had in the past when bugs got
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 14:30:21 +0100
Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 11:41:57 +0100
Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote:
Assigning bugs so arch teams is cosmetic at best.
s|so|to|
While it was not explained here, the idea can also move the actual
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 10:18:32 -0500
Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Many objected to removal since old with minor issues is better than
new that doesn't work at all on some archs, or so the argument goes.
TL;DR: The opposite exists, I think we should draw a bar in the middle.
So goes the
On Sat, 15 Feb 2014 16:53:22 -0600
William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
The problem with this is, what if it is more than one arch team? Which
one do you assign it to?
The fastest gun in the west.
If we want a separate assignee for old stabilizations, what about a
separate project that
17 matches
Mail list logo
