Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags

2014-03-22 Thread hasufell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Ciaran McCreesh: > On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:33:27 -0700 Alec Warner > wrote: >> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags > > And do what with them? Right now this is a solution without a > problem. > Finding packages. Descriptions are not consiste

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags

2014-03-22 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Mar 22, 2014 at 7:48 PM, hasufell wrote: >> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags > Sounds good, but how do we get consistency in there? I mean... this > only works if we have some sort of consensus about tag names, at least > more common ones. The alternative to consistency/etc is cr

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags

2014-03-22 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:33:27 -0700 Alec Warner wrote: > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags And do what with them? Right now this is a solution without a problem. -- Ciaran McCreesh signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags

2014-03-22 Thread hasufell
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Alec Warner: > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags > > Object or forever hold your peace. > > Or argue for 100 posts, either way. > > -A > Sounds good, but how do we get consistency in there? I mean... this only works if we have some sort

[gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags

2014-03-22 Thread Alec Warner
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags Object or forever hold your peace. Or argue for 100 posts, either way. -A

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.19 moving to ~arch

2014-03-22 Thread Lars Wendler
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 02:10:46 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: >i've seen like no bugs due to glibc-2.19, so i'll be moving it into >~arch in the next week or so >-mike +1 Works fine on two of my systems. -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 4DD8 C47C CDFA 5295 E1A6 3FC8 F696 74AB 981C A6F

Re: [gentoo-dev] remove USE flag "ldap" from profile "desktop"

2014-03-22 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 09:46:58 +0100 Toralf Förster wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > IMO it is the choice of users to opt in for LDAP, not to opt out for > it. I'm convinced that the majority of Gentoo users does not need it > per default. Before we discuss this agai

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.19 moving to ~arch

2014-03-22 Thread Tom Wijsman
On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 02:10:46 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > i've seen like no bugs due to glibc-2.19, so i'll be moving it into > ~arch in the next week or so Have been using it for a while, because it does fix things like acroread; I've not spotted any problems, or heard about them in other comm

[gentoo-dev] remove USE flag "ldap" from profile "desktop"

2014-03-22 Thread Toralf Förster
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 IMO it is the choice of users to opt in for LDAP, not to opt out for it. I'm convinced that the majority of Gentoo users does not need it per default. - -- MfG/Sincerely Toralf Förster pgp finger print:1A37 6F99 4A9D 026F 13E2 4DCF C4EA CDDE 0076

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-apache/mod_ruby

2014-03-22 Thread Hans de Graaff
# Hans de Graaff (22 Mar 2014) Dead upstream (no # releases since 2008, website no longer available). Can only support # a single ruby version. Has security issues with shared code between # processes. Use a rack-based alternative instead. # Removal in 30 days. www-apache/mod_ruby