On 04/19/2014 06:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> People are either inlining this or creating local functions for this
> purpose, so it'd be better to have them in the eclass.
>
> RFC: what about '!use'? Should we invert the multilib_build_binaries
> test as well?
> ---
> eclass/multilib-build.eclass
People are either inlining this or creating local functions for this
purpose, so it'd be better to have them in the eclass.
RFC: what about '!use'? Should we invert the multilib_build_binaries
test as well?
---
eclass/multilib-build.eclass | 48
1 file
Committed as r1.72.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature