[gentoo-dev] Last rites: games-emulation/{boycott-advance-sdl,neopocott}

2014-05-18 Thread Ulrich Mueller
# Ulrich Müller u...@gentoo.org (17 May 2014) # SRC_URI dead and no license permitting redistribution. # HOMEPAGE gone, attempts to contact main upstream author failed. # Second upstream author does not have access to sources any more. # Masked for removal in 30 days, bug 505620.

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Update to elisp-common.eclass

2014-05-18 Thread Ulrich Mueller
The patch below will introduce two changes to function elisp-site-regen (which is called in postinst and postrm phases): 1. Site-init files of Elisp packages will only be looked for in the site-gentoo.d subdirectory, but no longer in the main /usr/share/emacs/site-lisp dir. The

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update to elisp-common.eclass

2014-05-18 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 18 May 2014 20:13:07 +0200 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: Are you sure this is useful? --- a/eclass/elisp-common.eclass +++ b/eclass/elisp-common.eclass @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -# Copyright 1999-2013 Gentoo Foundation +# Copyright 1999-2014 Gentoo Foundation # Distributed under the

[gentoo-dev] Is it possible to ignore / override parts of binpkg environment locally?

2014-05-18 Thread Leho Kraav
Hi all Scenario: I'm developing yet another bootstrapping process for whatever reason. Let's say the project needs some changes made to user.eclass. I make the changes, set eclass-overrides, do my test bootstrapping run, build all the packages. Then on the binclient, it turns out something

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-05-18 23h59 UTC

2014-05-18 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2014-05-18 23h59 UTC. Removals: dev-libs/clens 2014-05-12 04:40:38 ulm dev-java/randomguid

[gentoo-dev] Re: Is it possible to ignore / override parts of binpkg environment locally?

2014-05-18 Thread Leho Kraav
On 19.05.2014 03:11, Leho Kraav wrote: Do I now always have to rebuild all the packages to get the new changes to user.eclass included? I'd really like to just ignore the environment file coming with the binpkg and the let the local system determine pretty much everything. Then I could just

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Is it possible to ignore / override parts of binpkg environment locally?

2014-05-18 Thread Alec Warner
On Sun, May 18, 2014 at 6:29 PM, Leho Kraav l...@kraav.com wrote: On 19.05.2014 03:11, Leho Kraav wrote: Do I now always have to rebuild all the packages to get the new changes to user.eclass included? I'd really like to just ignore the environment file coming with the binpkg and the let

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Update to elisp-common.eclass

2014-05-18 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Mon, 19 May 2014, Jeroen Roovers wrote: Are you sure this is useful? elisp-site-regen() { [...] -if [[ ! -d ${T} ]]; then -eerror elisp-site-regen: Temporary directory ${T} does not exist -return 1 -fi The package manager must define the following

[gentoo-portage-dev] Next team meeting

2014-05-18 Thread Brian Dolbec
Sorry for the long time since our last meeting. The next team meeting scheduler: http://whenisgood.net/3547ndr Proposed dates are from Saturday, May 24 through Sunday June 1. Please try to pick as wide a time period as possible to allow for the most team members to attend. Please keep in mind

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Next team meeting

2014-05-18 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 18 May 2014 08:59:59 -0700 Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote: The next team meeting scheduler: http://whenisgood.net/3547ndr Proposed dates are from Saturday, May 24 through Sunday June 1. Please try to pick as wide a time period as possible to allow for the most team