Re: [gentoo-dev] packages masked for removal in 30 days
24.05.2014 19:07, gro...@gentoo.org пишет: On Fri, 23 May 2014, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: s/worthy of/required to cc/ Additionally, why mask and remove instead of just doing a pkgmove? I've sent this to gentoo-dev-annou...@lists.gentoo.org, but it never appeared. I'm subscribed to gentoo-dev-announce; don't know what's the matter. Probably you did not wait for approval, dev-announce is moderated list, you know... -- Best regards, Sergey Popov Gentoo developer Gentoo Desktop Effects project lead Gentoo Qt project lead Gentoo Proxy maintainers project lead signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH python-utils-r1] Move python_fix_shebang to python-utils-r1 and rewrite it clean.
Dnia 2014-05-20, o godz. 20:19:58 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org napisał(a): It serves both as public shebang fixing function and replacement of _python_rewrite_shebang internal function. For the sake of having common code and consistent behavior. Committed. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
[gentoo-dev] UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release - No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore
UPower upstream removed sys-power/pm-utils support from 0.99 release (currently unkeyworded in tree), as in, from current git master. UPower upstream created 0.9 bit branch that has the old legacy upower with sys-power/pm-utils support available still with --enable-deprecated. So, sys-power/upower will move on to 0.99 and is, thus, mostly usable only for sys-apps/systemd users, however, Xfce upstream in git master already moved the sys-power/pm-utils code that upower had over directly to the apps, like xfce4-session and xfce4-power-manager, and will, after next releases, still work without sys-apps/systemd even with 0.99 version. What was done? sys-power/upower-pm-utils was created where we will maintain upower 0.9 git branch, currently it's identical to =sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r2, but will soon be a git snapshot instead. What needs to be done before we can keyword =sys-power/upower-0.99? See examples of uevt, wmbattery, xfce4-session, xfce4-settings, xfce4-power-manager, xfce4-systemload-plugin, xfce4-weather-plugin which I already converted (mostly) from this list: http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/genrdeps/rindex/sys-power/upower Other are all undone, as in, converting deps to what they actually support: || ( sys-power/upower sys-power/upower-pm-utils ) where everything is supported || ( sys-power/upower-0.99 sys-power/upower-pm-utils ) where only upower with pm-utils is supported =sys-power/upower-0.99 where new API is mandatory, currently this would only be = GNOME 3.12 stuff well, figure it out, these are just examples Confusing bug 508920 also exists, but most of the conversation there is outdated I'm going to spinal surgery this friday, and I propably don't have health, time, or motivation to open a Tracker bug and file all the bugs for the reverse deps this week at all. Thus, I propably won't be working on this much this week at all. Things are OK as they are now in Portage, because =sys-power/upower-0.99 is not keyworded yet, so nothing is broken, it's just work undone. I know GNOME folks want to get it done, because GNOME 3.12 stuff actually needs upower-0.99, but I'm saying they can NOT keyword the version without fixing rest of the tree before doing so as described above. So help me out, or wait it out (like 2 weeks). Thanks, Samuli
[gentoo-dev] Re: UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release - No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore
Note: If you want to convert your ebuild, you can /msg ssuominen on Freenode and post an ebuild diff, I can quickly review if the dependency changes are OK for you, or clarify anything else you want regarding this. Sorry, I know this unorthodox workflow, but I'm too sick to even properly sit in the chair currently, and people keep poking me regarding the issue, over any other issues ;-( On 26/05/14 23:15, Samuli Suominen wrote: UPower upstream removed sys-power/pm-utils support from 0.99 release (currently unkeyworded in tree), as in, from current git master. UPower upstream created 0.9 bit branch that has the old legacy upower with sys-power/pm-utils support available still with --enable-deprecated. So, sys-power/upower will move on to 0.99 and is, thus, mostly usable only for sys-apps/systemd users, however, Xfce upstream in git master already moved the sys-power/pm-utils code that upower had over directly to the apps, like xfce4-session and xfce4-power-manager, and will, after next releases, still work without sys-apps/systemd even with 0.99 version. What was done? sys-power/upower-pm-utils was created where we will maintain upower 0.9 git branch, currently it's identical to =sys-power/upower-0.9.23-r2, but will soon be a git snapshot instead. What needs to be done before we can keyword =sys-power/upower-0.99? See examples of uevt, wmbattery, xfce4-session, xfce4-settings, xfce4-power-manager, xfce4-systemload-plugin, xfce4-weather-plugin which I already converted (mostly) from this list: http://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/genrdeps/rindex/sys-power/upower Other are all undone, as in, converting deps to what they actually support: || ( sys-power/upower sys-power/upower-pm-utils ) where everything is supported || ( sys-power/upower-0.99 sys-power/upower-pm-utils ) where only upower with pm-utils is supported =sys-power/upower-0.99 where new API is mandatory, currently this would only be = GNOME 3.12 stuff well, figure it out, these are just examples Confusing bug 508920 also exists, but most of the conversation there is outdated I'm going to spinal surgery this friday, and I propably don't have health, time, or motivation to open a Tracker bug and file all the bugs for the reverse deps this week at all. Thus, I propably won't be working on this much this week at all. Things are OK as they are now in Portage, because =sys-power/upower-0.99 is not keyworded yet, so nothing is broken, it's just work undone. I know GNOME folks want to get it done, because GNOME 3.12 stuff actually needs upower-0.99, but I'm saying they can NOT keyword the version without fixing rest of the tree before doing so as described above. So help me out, or wait it out (like 2 weeks). Thanks, Samuli
Re: [gentoo-dev] UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release - No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore
Dnia 2014-05-26, o godz. 23:15:34 Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org napisał(a): UPower upstream removed sys-power/pm-utils support from 0.99 release (currently unkeyworded in tree), as in, from current git master. Don't worry. Looking at the past, I can guess this is only a temporary inconvenience. I'm pretty sure upower will be discontinued soon and replaced with systemd-powerd or something :D. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: PGP signature
