[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2014-06-08 23h59 UTC

2014-06-08 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2014-06-08 23h59 UTC. Removals: dev-python/python-gnutls2014-06-02 09:34:52 mrueg dev-ruby/fastthread 2014-06-07 22:06:51 mrueg Additions: media-gf

[gentoo-dev] mail-client/mail-notification up for grabs

2014-06-08 Thread Pacho Ramos
mail-client/mail-notification is up for grabs. If anyone volunteers to take it, that would be nice Thanks

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The state and future of the OpenRC project

2014-06-08 Thread Alexander Berntsen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 08/06/14 18:38, Alexey Shvetsov wrote: >> Perhaps we could consider GitLab? > > Yep. Its better to have gitlab || gerrit || ReviewBoard Personaly > i have only expirience with gerrit > > However this will depend on migration of gentoo-x86 to git

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The state and future of the OpenRC project

2014-06-08 Thread Alexey Shvetsov
В письме от 9 июня 2014 01:36:49 пользователь Michael Palimaka написал: > On 06/09/2014 12:41 AM, hasufell wrote: > > The amount of contributors (with real patches and real ebuilds) is > > constantly decreasing, because our workflow is horrible. I hope you > > don't actually think that bugzilla is

Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project

2014-06-08 Thread hasufell
Jeroen Roovers: > On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 14:41:04 + > hasufell wrote: > >> The amount of contributors (with real patches and real ebuilds) is >> constantly decreasing, > > As evidenced where exactly? > I am not sure if that is a joke. You can pretty much ask most major gentoo projects. The on

[gentoo-dev] Re: The state and future of the OpenRC project

2014-06-08 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 06/09/2014 12:41 AM, hasufell wrote: > The amount of contributors (with real patches and real ebuilds) is > constantly decreasing, because our workflow is horrible. I hope you > don't actually think that bugzilla is an appropriate review platform. The problem is finding improvements that everyon

Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project

2014-06-08 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 14:41:04 + hasufell wrote: > The amount of contributors (with real patches and real ebuilds) is > constantly decreasing, As evidenced where exactly? > because our workflow is horrible. I hope you > don't actually think that bugzilla is an appropriate review platform. A

Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project

2014-06-08 Thread hasufell
Jeroen Roovers: > On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 03:05:28 +0200 > Alexander Berntsen wrote: > >> On 07/06/14 23:08, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >>> You can start fixing bugs immediately. You can check out the >>> sources, write patches and attach the patches to the bug reports. >>> Then all it takes is someone el

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2014-06-08 Thread Fabio Erculiani
Due to permanent lack of time, I'm unable to properly maintain the packages below. Feel free to take them over. I'll remove myself from metadata.xml in 14 days. app-admin/389-admin-console app-admin/389-console app-admin/389-ds-console app-admin/aws-as-tools app-admin/aws-elb-tools app-admin/aws-i

Re: [gentoo-dev] The state and future of the OpenRC project

2014-06-08 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Sun, 08 Jun 2014 03:05:28 +0200 Alexander Berntsen wrote: > On 07/06/14 23:08, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > > You can start fixing bugs immediately. You can check out the > > sources, write patches and attach the patches to the bug reports. > > Then all it takes is someone else to review/commit the