On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 15:55:49 +0200
Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Today some user on IRC noted that there were some doubts about if
> developers are allowed to stabilize packages they maintain when they
> are able to test on relevant arches (I guess this would benefit amd64
> and x86 mostly as it's likely
On Sat, 26 Jul 2014 14:25:23 + (UTC)
Martin Vaeth wrote:
> Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > Michael Palimaka wrote:
> >
> >> What a great way to kill the distro.
> >>
> >> I can already heat my house with the number of unnecessary rebuilds
> >
> > Do you upgrade @world every hour and thus have it cau
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Friends,
the repoman patch is reverted. And that is the end of this.
I do not have gx86 access, so if someone wants me to revert 3K commits
there, I'll need a proxy...
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BE
On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 05:30:26 +1000
Michael Palimaka wrote:
> On 07/27/2014 05:21 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Jul 2014 03:12:07 +1000
> > Michael Palimaka wrote:
> >
> >> On 07/26/2014 07:59 AM, Tom Wijsman wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 22:14:41 +1000
> >>> Michael Palimaka wrote:
On Wed, 30 Jul 2014 15:38:43 +0300
Samuli Suominen wrote:
> That's what I've been trying to point out, people are seriously
> suggesting disabling dynamic deps for race conditions
> It's like fixing one audio driver in the kernel by deleting whole
> ALSA block
It is more like fixing multiple bro
Chris Reffett:
>
> if people want to run this by Council
I'll laugh my ass off if this thing makes it on the council agenda xD
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/14 03:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2014-08-12, o godz. 10:04:58 Ian Stakenvicius
> napisał(a):
>> On 12/08/14 09:54 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>>>
>>> Perhaps we need to have a less-important repoman warning level
>>> (something tha
Dnia 2014-08-12, o godz. 10:04:58
Ian Stakenvicius napisał(a):
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 12/08/14 09:54 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >
> > Perhaps we need to have a less-important repoman warning level
> > (something that can be quieted with a flag) for things
Dnia 2014-08-11, o godz. 20:48:20
William Hubbs napisał(a):
> On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 03:22:11PM +0300, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> > Hello World!
> >
> > TL;DR:
> > This evening I plan to mangle ~3000 ebuilds in the main tree
> > by dropping trailing '.' in all 'DESCRIPTION=' fields (except
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/12/2014 9:26 AM, Rich Freeman wrote:
[snip]
> I don't have a problem with QA recommending new tree policies, but
> if they're going to do this the QA team ought to first ensure that
> the team agrees (however they want to govern that), and then
Dnia 2014-08-11, o godz. 22:34:06
Bertrand Jacquin napisał(a):
> Hi,
>
> On 2014-08-10 14:22, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
>
> > The script does not handle case of multiline description:
> > DESCRIPTION="You have to
> > clean that yourself."
>
> You could handle this by reading metadata/m
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 01:25:44PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> >
> > I don't consider a recommended style message to be 'broken' just
> > because it's not listed in the devmanual/PMS/etc as a requirement.
> > The implementation of it, on
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 1:13 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
> I don't consider a recommended style message to be 'broken' just
> because it's not listed in the devmanual/PMS/etc as a requirement.
> The implementation of it, on the other hand, yes that could be broken
> and in this case should be fi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/14 01:08 PM, hasufell wrote:
> Ian Stakenvicius:
>> So instead of, for instance, dropping the
>> DESCRIPTION-ending-in-period check, it could instead be relegated
>> to a "nag" that could be hidden with --nonag.
>
> It will still be broken,
Ian Stakenvicius:
> So instead of, for
> instance, dropping the DESCRIPTION-ending-in-period check, it could
> instead be relegated to a "nag" that could be hidden with --nonag.
It will still be broken, even if you hide it.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/14 12:36 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ian Stakenvicius
> wrote:
>>
>> I'm wondering what everyone thinks of having a --nonag option to
>> repoman and shoving some of the more trivial/style-related
>> repoman
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 10:04 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
> I'm wondering what everyone thinks of having a --nonag option to
> repoman and shoving some of the more trivial/style-related repoman
> 'warnings' into a 'nag' level warning? IIRC at least one of the QA
> team members is so tired of th
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 09:26:07AM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
*snip*
> Yeah, at best this seems a bit trivial. Do we have a policy that
> descriptions aren't allowed to be complete sentences? Many of our
> developers are not native English speakers in the first place, so
> striving for gramma
Rich Freeman:
> so striving for grammatical perfection is a bit optimistic.
In that case, we should just rm the repoman warning and stop discussing
this matter.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/08/14 05:03 PM, Thomas Kahle wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/08/14 18:18, Igor wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Hereby the summary of my personal suggestions to increase GENTOO
>> stability and help it's maintainers and developers.
>>
>> 1. make.conf
>>
>> A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/14 09:54 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
>
> Perhaps we need to have a less-important repoman warning level
> (something that can be quieted with a flag) for things like this?
> In terms of DESCRIPTION consistency I don't see it being a bad
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 12/08/14 08:47 AM, hasufell wrote:
> William Hubbs:
>> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:59:30AM +0200, Manuel Rüger wrote:
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
>>
>> *snip*
>>
>>> These links might be helpful:
>>>
>>> http://git.overla
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 8:47 AM, hasufell wrote:
>
> First, a sentence does not need to have a predicate. I know that for 99%
> sure in german and the english wikipedia article seems to suggest the
> same. Correct me if I am wrong.
>
In English your typical English class would teach that every se
William Hubbs:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 03:59:30AM +0200, Manuel Rüger wrote:
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA512
>
> *snip*
>
>> These links might be helpful:
>>
>> http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/portage.git;a=commit;h=06637c4215d55c57517739214c6e0fd6f8f53914
On Tue, Aug 12, 2014 at 11:55:51AM +0400, Sergey Popov wrote:
> 11.08.2014 04:25, Robin H. Johnson пишет:
> > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
> > from the tree, for the week ending 2014-08-10 23h59 UTC.
> >
> > Removals:
> > dev-vcs/gitosis 2014-0
On 12/08/14 01:29 AM, Duncan wrote:
> Follow the instructions, as found in the headers of every mail on the
> list including the one you replied to, or the ones on the site you
> presumably signed up from? Seriously:
s/presumably //, this list is closed-loop.
signature.asc
Description: OpenP
11.08.2014 04:25, Robin H. Johnson пишет:
> The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed
> from the tree, for the week ending 2014-08-10 23h59 UTC.
>
> Removals:
> dev-vcs/gitosis 2014-08-04 04:35:46 robbat2
> dev-vcs/gitosis-gentoo2014-08-04 04:
27 matches
Mail list logo
