Re: [gentoo-dev] [news item review] bash-completion-2.1-r90, version 2

2014-11-20 Thread Diamond
On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:18:01 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello, developers. I'm planning to commit this news item before =2.1-r90 goes stable. It's pretty strange, but after the last emerge -1uDN world system update I lost bash-complition. It was removed

Re: [gentoo-dev] [news item review] bash-completion-2.1-r90, version 2

2014-11-20 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-11-20, o godz. 11:58:59 Diamond diam...@hi-net.ru napisał(a): On Mon, 10 Nov 2014 22:18:01 +0100 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello, developers. I'm planning to commit this news item before =2.1-r90 goes stable. It's pretty strange, but after the last emerge -1uDN

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-20 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-11-19, o godz. 17:41:53 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu napisał(a): On 31 October 2014 09:28, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: So who wants to pick up the pieces now? Because I'm almost pissed off enough to turn down the tinderbox and give a big FU to

Re: [gentoo-dev] [news item review] bash-completion-2.1-r90, version 2

2014-11-20 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-11-10, o godz. 22:18:01 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org napisał(a): Hello, developers. I'm planning to commit this news item before =2.1-r90 goes stable. I have rewritten the message to be more user-oriented like Rich suggested (big thanks to you!) and added a paragraph about

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-project] Re: towards a more distributed model

2014-11-20 Thread Jauhien Piatlicki
On 11/20/2014 05:39 AM, hasufell wrote: I see a lot of things to figure out (especially PM-side, tools-side, maybe even PMS, maybe even repository layout, but also documentation and if it makes sense culture-wise), but I don't see a fundamental unsolvable problem here. It would be

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-20 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 11/20/14 04:37, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-11-19, o godz. 17:41:53 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu napisał(a): On 31 October 2014 09:28, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: So who wants to pick up the pieces now? Because I'm almost pissed off enough to turn down

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-20 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 19/11/14 09:51 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: On 31 October 2014 09:28, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: So who wants to pick up the pieces now?

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-20 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 20/11/14 09:47 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: On 19/11/14 09:51 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 8:41 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: On 31 October 2014 09:28, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-project] Re: towards a more distributed model

2014-11-20 Thread Ciaran McCreesh
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014 01:36:32 +0100 hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: Exherbo is already running a more modular approach, I'd be interested what they have to say about this or which problems they were facing. Well the big thing is that unlike Gentoo, Exherbo was able to switch to using Git for

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-20 Thread hasufell
From: Julian Ospald hasuf...@gentoo.org Date: Thu Nov 20 17:04:20 UTC 2014 Subject: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386 This also removes unnecessary exports of games variables. --- eclass/games.eclass +++ eclass/games.eclass @@ -19,25 +19,46 @@ *) die no

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-20 Thread hasufell
I am running this since ~4 months straight without any problems.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-20 Thread Ulrich Mueller
On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, hasufell wrote: From: Julian Ospald hasuf...@gentoo.org Date: Thu Nov 20 17:04:20 UTC 2014 Subject: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386 This also removes unnecessary exports of games variables. Wouldn't it be saner to have a new games-r1.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-20 Thread hasufell
On 11/20/2014 06:49 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, hasufell wrote: From: Julian Ospald hasuf...@gentoo.org Date: Thu Nov 20 17:04:20 UTC 2014 Subject: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386 This also removes unnecessary exports of games variables.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-project] Re: towards a more distributed model

2014-11-20 Thread hasufell
On 11/20/2014 12:41 PM, Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: On 11/20/2014 05:39 AM, hasufell wrote: I see a lot of things to figure out (especially PM-side, tools-side, maybe even PMS, maybe even repository layout, but also documentation and if it makes sense culture-wise), but I don't see a fundamental

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage dependency solving algorithm

2014-11-20 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/19/2014 11:59 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: Hello, On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:55:48 -0800 Zac Medico wrote: On 11/17/2014 09:47 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: I use 2.2.14 on both hosts (and usually latest ~x86 portage is there). I thought that running fixpackages should be enough to run

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] games.eclass: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386

2014-11-20 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2014-11-20, o godz. 18:49:25 Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On Thu, 20 Nov 2014, hasufell wrote: From: Julian Ospald hasuf...@gentoo.org Date: Thu Nov 20 17:04:20 UTC 2014 Subject: Allow to disable games permissions wrt #467386 This also removes unnecessary

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage dependency solving algorithm

2014-11-20 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/20/2014 12:19 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 11/19/2014 11:59 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: Hello, On Mon, 17 Nov 2014 21:55:48 -0800 Zac Medico wrote: On 11/17/2014 09:47 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: I use 2.2.14 on both hosts (and usually latest ~x86 portage is there). I thought that running

[gentoo-dev] Re: [news item review] bash-completion-2.1-r90, version 2

2014-11-20 Thread Duncan
Michał Górny posted on Thu, 20 Nov 2014 12:22:53 +0100 as excerpted: Thirdly, we have solved the issue causing bash-completion support to be enabled by default on login shells only. If you needed to explicitly source 'bash_completion' script in bashrc, you can safely remove that code now

Re: [gentoo-dev] more help needed with gcc-4.8 stabilization, chromium starts heavily using C++11

2014-11-20 Thread Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
On 11/20/14 5:04 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: Ok, added the RESO/NEEDINFO case, and bumped my polling time to 5 minute intervals. Diego, please keep going, your efforts are still very much appreciated. +1, and thanks Ian for your script! Paweł signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] Add emerge --with-test-deps option for bug #520652

2014-11-20 Thread Zac Medico
For packages matched by arguments, this option will pull in dependencies that are conditional on the test USE flag, even if FEATURES=test is not enabled for the matched packages. The state of the test USE flag is not affected by this option. It only changes the effective dependencies which are

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] emerge: check for writable PKGDIR (490732)

2014-11-20 Thread Zac Medico
If there are packages to be merged and buildpkg or buildsyspkg is enabled, then bail out early if PKGDIR is not writable (in order to avoid a fatal EROFS error which would otherwise occur later on). Behavior remains unchanged for --pretend, --fetchonly and --fetch-all-uri. For --ask, it will bail

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] _select_pkg_highest_available: selective cache invalidation (530010)

2014-11-20 Thread Zac Medico
Implement selective invalidation of cache for the depgraph._select_pkg_highest_available method, so that the entire cache is not discarded whenever a package is added to the graph. On one of my computers with this patch, 'emerge -puvDN @world' takes 15% less time, and results in 58% fewer