On 23 December 2014 at 00:11, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> +1 for an "archive overlay"
I set up the graveyard overlay for such purposes, a couple of years ago.
But it hasn't taken off: https://github.com/gentoo/graveyard
Feel free to resurrect it. (pun intended)
--
Cheers,
Ben | yngwin
Gentoo
Am Dienstag, 23. Dezember 2014, 14:36:44 schrieb Anthony G. Basile:
> >>> Do we really need glibc 2.9_p20081201-r3, 2.10.1-r1, 2.11.3, 2.12.1-r3,
> >>> 2.12.2, 2.13-r2, 2.14, 2.14.1-r2, 2.14.1-r3, 2.15-r1, 2.15-r2, 2.15-r3,
> >>> 2.16.0, 2.17, 2.18-r1, 2.19, 2.19-r1, and 2.20?
> >>
> >> I can't fu
# Michael Orlitzky (24 Dec 2014)
# Masked for removal in 30 days (bug #531954). All current versions of
# nagios block it, and it has unresolved LICENSE issues (bug #320241).
net-analyzer/nagios-imagepack
On 12/23/14 21:40, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 12/22/14 16:37, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Montag, 22. Dezember 2014, 18:24:32 schrieb Anthony G. Basile:
Well the side effect of this is that arcane and unmaintainable bandworms
like toolcha
On 12/23/14 21:39, Duncan wrote:
Anthony G. Basile posted on Tue, 23 Dec 2014 08:36:44 -0500 as excerpted:
I've watched musl and uclibc and just hit up against the glibc changes
as they mysteriously rain down from Drepper.
Just a quick reply to this side point...
There's no indication in your
