Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-needed@ packages need you!

2015-01-09 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hi, On Sat, 10 Jan 2015 00:01:46 +0100 Matthias Maier wrote: > Am 09. Jan 2015, 23:42 schrieb Diamond : > >> [...] (that's why I used all > >> that LXC and separate X server precautions). > > > > Can you give any reference about how to isolate Skype properly using > > LXC? This one is a good walk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-needed@ packages need you!

2015-01-09 Thread Matthias Maier
Am 09. Jan 2015, 23:42 schrieb Diamond : >> [...] (that's why I used all >> that LXC and separate X server precautions). > > Can you give any reference about how to isolate Skype properly using > LXC? I'm also interested in the separate X server part =)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2015-01-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 03:06:08PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: > net-proxy/dante I maintained this back in 2003, i'll take it on again. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85

Re: [gentoo-dev] qa last rites multiple packages

2015-01-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > # Sergey Popov (04 Sep 2014) > # Security mask, wrt bugs #488212, #498164, #500260, > # #507802 and #518718 ># Ulrich Müller (15 Jul 2014) > # Permanently mask sys-libs/lib-compat and its reverse dependencies, > # pending multip

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: maintainer-needed@ packages need you!

2015-01-09 Thread Diamond
On Sun, 7 Sep 2014 01:16:57 +0400 Andrew Savchenko wrote: > It should be noted that at least in Linux skype is much harder to > install and use since it requires pulseaudio and I don't use > that sh^W stuff. So skype reqires its own LXC container set up > which is doable, but costed me a day (wi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: qa last rites -- long list

2015-01-09 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-01-08, o godz. 10:45:33 Pacho Ramos napisał(a): > El mié, 07-01-2015 a las 19:19 -0500, Jonathan Callen escribió: > [...] > > The only reason there is a security issue with nethack (and other > > games like it) on Gentoo, and only on Gentoo, is that the games team > > policy requires th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: qa last rites -- long list

2015-01-09 Thread Luis Ressel
On Thu, 8 Jan 2015 09:16:36 -0600 William Hubbs wrote: > Rich is correct, maintainers are no longer bound by the games team > policy. > I didn't know this. If that's the case, I'd like to proxy-maintain nethack. I'll try and prepare the neccessary ebuild changes. Luis Ressel pgpDC_qIfUsBS.p