Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64

2015-01-25 Thread Luca Barbato
On 25/01/15 03:57, Tom Gall wrote: Hi All, This is sort of a CFP in some ways but not quite that formal. I’ve been throttled back on arm64 for a bit as the hardware I’ve had access to has all been painfully remote and configured in ways that was less than optimal for massive key wording

Re: [gentoo-dev] Things one could be upset about

2015-01-25 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 01/22/2015 10:19, Peter Stuge wrote: Joshua Kinard wrote: Using seed stage3 stages I built 6 months ago (but never released due to getting sidetracked), I run into errors like this: !!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled !!! into the dependency graph,

RE: [gentoo-dev] Figuring out the solution to in-network-sandbox distcc

2015-01-25 Thread Thomas D.
Hi, Michał Górny wrote: I see two generic approaches possible here: 1. proxying distcc from within the build environment, or 2. moving distcc-spawned processes back to parent's namespace. distcc client/server solution - The most obvious solution to me

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] Support escaping network-sandbox through SOCKSv5 proxy

2015-01-25 Thread Michał Górny
Add a minimal SOCKSv5-over-UNIX-socket proxy to Portage, and start it whenever ebuilds are started with network-sandbox enabled. Pass the socket address in PORTAGE_SOCKS5_PROXY and DISTCC_SOCKS_PROXY variables. The proxy can be used to escape the network sandbox whenever network access is really

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64

2015-01-25 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 01/24/15 21:57, Tom Gall wrote: Hi All, This is sort of a CFP in some ways but not quite that formal. I’ve been throttled back on arm64 for a bit as the hardware I’ve had access to has all been painfully remote and configured in ways that was less than optimal for massive key wording

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v3] Support escaping network-sandbox through SOCKSv5 proxy

2015-01-25 Thread Michał Górny
Add a minimal SOCKSv5-over-UNIX-socket proxy to Portage, and start it whenever ebuilds are started with network-sandbox enabled. Pass the socket address in PORTAGE_SOCKS5_PROXY and DISTCC_SOCKS_PROXY variables. The proxy can be used to escape the network sandbox whenever network access is really

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64

2015-01-25 Thread Yixun Lan
On 20:57 Sat 24 Jan , Tom Gall wrote: Hi All, This is sort of a CFP in some ways but not quite that formal. I’ve been throttled back on arm64 for a bit as the hardware I’ve had access to has all been painfully remote and configured in ways that was less than optimal for massive key

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64

2015-01-25 Thread Tom Gall
Least speaking for myself I can help you out starting Feb 15th, presuming all the stars are in alignment. If someone else doesn’t help you before, please mark it on your calendar and bug me again then cause I’m sure I’ll forget! Best, Tom On Jan 25, 2015, at 11:43 AM, Sebastian Pipping

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64

2015-01-25 Thread Sebastian Pipping
Hi! I got a bug report for arm64 against the test suite of uriparser. If I could get a temporary arm64 shell somewhere, that could help me understand the issue. Best, Sebastian

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v3] Support escaping network-sandbox through SOCKSv5 proxy

2015-01-25 Thread Brian Dolbec
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 17:23:38 -0800 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 01/25/2015 02:34 PM, Michał Górny wrote: diff --git a/bin/socks5-server.py b/bin/socks5-server.py new file mode 100644 index 000..45cf76b --- /dev/null +++ b/bin/socks5-server.py @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Things one could be upset about

2015-01-25 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 04:29:43 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Alexey Mishustin posted on Sat, 24 Jan 2015 21:54:06 +0400 as excerpted: 2015-01-20 14:42 GMT+04:00 Róbert Čerňanský ope...@tightmail.com: I somehow thought that edit the overgrowing package.use file upon each

Re: [gentoo-dev] Figuring out the solution to in-network-sandbox distcc

2015-01-25 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-01-21, o godz. 11:05:34 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org napisał(a): Generic proxy solution -- The simplest solution so far seems to be setting a generic SOCKS proxy inside the build environment, and wrapping distcc so that it will use it for network access.

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] SOCKSv5: report bound socket name

2015-01-25 Thread Michał Górny
Report bound socket name as requested by the protocol. Supports both IPv4 and IPv6 sockets. --- bin/socks5-server.py | 21 + 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/bin/socks5-server.py b/bin/socks5-server.py index 4795dcc..78a6751 100644 ---

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Support escaping network-sandbox through SOCKSv5 proxy

2015-01-25 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-01-25, o godz. 12:29:54 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org napisał(a): Add a minimal SOCKSv5-over-UNIX-socket proxy to Portage, and start it whenever ebuilds are started with network-sandbox enabled. Pass the socket address in PORTAGE_SOCKS5_PROXY and DISTCC_SOCKS_PROXY variables. The

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] SOCKSv5: report bound socket name

2015-01-25 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-01-25, o godz. 13:19:37 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org napisał(a): Report bound socket name as requested by the protocol. Supports both IPv4 and IPv6 sockets. Now included (with fixes) in: [PATCH v2] Support escaping network-sandbox through SOCKSv5 proxy -- Best regards, Michał

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] Support escaping network-sandbox through SOCKSv5 proxy

2015-01-25 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/25/2015 06:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote: diff --git a/bin/socks5-server.py b/bin/socks5-server.py new file mode 100644 index 000..c079018 --- /dev/null +++ b/bin/socks5-server.py @@ -0,0 +1,218 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python +# SOCKSv5 proxy server for network-sandbox +# Copyright 2015

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] Support escaping network-sandbox through SOCKSv5 proxy

2015-01-25 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/25/2015 06:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote: diff --git a/bin/socks5-server.py b/bin/socks5-server.py new file mode 100644 index 000..c079018 --- /dev/null +++ b/bin/socks5-server.py @@ -0,0 +1,218 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python +# SOCKSv5 proxy server for network-sandbox +# Copyright 2015

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] Support escaping network-sandbox through SOCKSv5 proxy

2015-01-25 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/25/2015 06:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote: + def __bool__(self):a + return self.socket_path is not None You should also implement __nonzero__ for python-2.x. -- Thanks, Zac

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] Support escaping network-sandbox through SOCKSv5 proxy

2015-01-25 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 2015-01-25, o godz. 13:43:14 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org napisał(a): On 01/25/2015 06:00 AM, Michał Górny wrote: diff --git a/bin/socks5-server.py b/bin/socks5-server.py new file mode 100644 index 000..c079018 --- /dev/null +++ b/bin/socks5-server.py @@ -0,0 +1,218 @@

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v3] Support escaping network-sandbox through SOCKSv5 proxy

2015-01-25 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/25/2015 02:34 PM, Michał Górny wrote: diff --git a/bin/socks5-server.py b/bin/socks5-server.py new file mode 100644 index 000..45cf76b --- /dev/null +++ b/bin/socks5-server.py @@ -0,0 +1,233 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env python +# SOCKSv5 proxy server for network-sandbox +# Copyright 2015

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2015-01-25 23:59 UTC

2015-01-25 Thread Robin H. Johnson
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2015-01-25 23:59 UTC. Removals: dev-ruby/tmail 2015-01-21 05:05:30 mrueg dev-ruby/refe 2015-01-21 05:05:57 mrueg

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Allow IPC networking during pkg_config pkg_info

2015-01-25 Thread Zac Medico
On 01/25/2015 03:42 AM, Michał Górny wrote: --- pym/portage/package/ebuild/doebuild.py | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pym/portage/package/ebuild/doebuild.py b/pym/portage/package/ebuild/doebuild.py index 0d71f01..050f6c4 100644 ---