[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-java/jackson-mapper

# James Le Cuirot (6 Mar 2015) # A Jackon library that was part of v1 but not v2. Nothing in the tree # has ever required v1. Removal in 30 days. dev-java/jackson-mapper -- James Le Cuirot (chewi) Gentoo Linux Developer pgpfkAnoiHJi9.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 1:14 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote: > > It doesn't hurt to have a recommendation, and personally I really appreciate > when people (yes, that includes developers and wranglers ;-) update the line > to be more informative. There already is a recommendation on the wiki, part > of t

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 06:55:13AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote: > Out of curiousity, what makes the changes necessary in the first > place? It seems like an incredible amount of effort is going into > standardizing the format of textual summary lines and perhaps the > simplest solution is to just no

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

On Thu, Mar 5, 2015 at 2:01 PM, "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > > What is your preference? Let's agree on something and avoid unnecessary > changes on bugzilla. Out of curiousity, what makes the changes necessary in the first place? It seems like an incredible amount of effort is going into standar

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

> On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > I'm trying to find the best fix for > > Currently file-stabilization-bugs.py uses the '%s: stabilization > request' % cpv format. The Emacs team used to have a stabilisation template with summar

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 15:20:23 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > So jer format is something like "%s - foo". Yes. I now have a format named after me. > I guess I subconsciously reverted to using a colon because that's what > makes the most sense to me. But there is a little ambiguity with slots > i

Re: [gentoo-dev] what's the correct format for bugs containing package name and version?

On Thu, 05 Mar 2015 20:01:23 +0100 "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > I'm trying to find the best fix for > > > Currently file-stabilization-bugs.py uses the '%s: stabilization > request' % cpv format. > > Here are some options I see: > > a) keep '%s: