On 03/14/2015 11:41 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:08 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/14/2015 09:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 13:43 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/11/2015 01:16 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 10:56 -0700, Zac
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:57 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/14/2015 11:41 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:08 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/14/2015 09:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 13:43 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/11/2015 01:16 PM,
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 23:14:57 +
James Le Cuirot ch...@gentoo.org wrote:
On the one hand, it should always be present now, given what I said about
@system above but on the other hand, if it gets installed as gfind
then there's no point in pulling it in if you're only going to call
find.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 14.03.2015 23:37, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Robin H. Johnson
robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
Suggestions: gentoo-repo gentoo-repository gentoo-main
gentoo-repo-main
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
gentoo
IMO this is the only really accurate name.
(it's also the repo_name)
There you go. It already has the name gentoo. :)
portage doesn't make sense, everything else is too long or
potentially confusing...
Yes
On 14 Mar 2015 23:14, James Le Cuirot wrote:
I've long considered the -delete argument to find to be widely supported
enough that using it in ebuilds should not be a problem. Indeed, a grep
of the tree shows that it is frequently used, even in eclasses.
I've just noticed that the man page
On 03/14/2015 12:30 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:57 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/14/2015 11:41 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:08 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/14/2015 09:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 13:43 -0700, Zac
This is a mostly inconsequential issue, but the Git migration provides
us a chance to make a clean break...
The repository of our ebuilds and the name of the CVS module have been
called gentoo-x86 since the start of Gentoo, because it originally was
only for x86. Here's the very first ebuild
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
proj/gentoo would be fine for me (with the same logic as in the
wiki that Gentoo is the main project)
Personally I would find this a bit confusing so I'd prefer a separate
namespace or no namespace, if going for a separate namespace it might
On 15 March 2015 at 06:34, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
imho,
Questions:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
gentoo
(it's also the repo_name)
Our repo is already named gentoo, so this makes the most sense.
But I wouldn't mind gentoo-main either. But then we should
Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
Calling it gentoo makes sense, because the entire tree is what makes
gentoo.
Exactly. And the repo already has this name set in repo_name.
But since it's namespaced in ebuilds/ and because ebuilds/
might have other gentoo-official repos too, then perhaps
On 15 March 2015 at 11:37, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Suggestions:
gentoo-repo
gentoo-repository
gentoo-main
gentoo-repo-main
gentoo-repository-main
Similarly in the solve confusion as to purpose for newbies:
gentoo-packages
gentoo-ebuilds
The names would be possibly be
On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 2:15 PM, Vladimir Diaz vladimir.v.d...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi,
I am a developer in the Secure Systems Lab at NYU. Our lab has
collaborated with popular software update systems in the open-source
community, including APT, yum, and YaST, to address security problems.
On Thu, Mar 12, 2015 at 10:26 AM, Joakim Tjernlund
joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 01:27 +, Duncan wrote:
Zac Medico posted on Wed, 11 Mar 2015 12:03:10 -0700 as excerpted:
On 03/11/2015 11:56 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 11:34
ebuilds/gentoo.git
or
ebuilds/gentoo-main.git
Namespacing things in ebuilds/ might be convenient in the future if we
pursue other types of official ebuild repositories.
Calling it gentoo makes sense, because the entire tree is what makes
gentoo. But since it's namespaced in ebuilds/ and
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 9:44 PM, Jason A. Donenfeld zx...@gentoo.org wrote:
Calling it gentoo makes sense, because the entire tree is what makes
gentoo. But since it's namespaced in ebuilds/ and because ebuilds/ might
have other gentoo-official repos too, then perhaps gentoo-main makes more
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 6:25 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
Suggestions:
gentoo-repo
gentoo-repository
gentoo-main
gentoo-repo-main
gentoo-repository-main
1. We have some namespaces in Git: proj, dev, priv, data, sites, exp; should
the
Hello all,
I've long considered the -delete argument to find to be widely supported
enough that using it in ebuilds should not be a problem. Indeed, a grep
of the tree shows that it is frequently used, even in eclasses.
I've just noticed that the man page states that it is not present in
the BSD
Rich Freeman wrote:
Calling it gentoo makes sense
The thing is, Gentoo is more than a bunch of ebuilds.
Sure, but the gentoo ebuild repo is just a bunch of ebuilds.
Gentoo as name can and should be used elsewhere too of course.
Certainly they're a HUGE part of Gentoo, but they alone
* Andreas K. Huettel schrieb am 14.03.15 um 23:34 Uhr:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
imho,
Questions:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
gentoo
(it's also the repo_name)
+1
My furst idea, too.
--
0x35A64134 - 8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317
3723 296C 6CCA
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Feel free to take over and drop me from metadata.xml, if you're
interested:
* app-editors/diakonos
Description: A Linux editor for the masses
* net-wireless/mfoc
Description: Mifare Classic Offline Cracker
* sys-apps/fwts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
imho,
Questions:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
gentoo
(it's also the repo_name)
portage doesn't make sense, everything else is too long or potentially
confusing...
1. We have some namespaces in Git: proj, dev, priv, data, sites,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/14/2015 11:34 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
imho,
Questions: 0. What names for the tree/repository.
gentoo (it's also the repo_name)
portage doesn't make sense, everything else is too long or
potentially confusing...
1. We have
mr_bones_15/03/09 18:15:22
Modified: package.use.mask
Log:
hide the qt5 stuff for yabause for now
[...]
+# Michael Sterrett mr_bones_@g.o (09 Mar 2015)
+# Mask qt5 support until qt5 is stable so as to not
+# hold up making yabause stable.
+games-emulation/yabause
On Sat, Mar 14, 2015 at 5:56 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote:
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
gentoo
IMO this is the only really accurate name.
I completely agree (with everything else in this email as well).
On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 10:51 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/13/2015 05:08 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 17:51 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/12/2015 02:43 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Why is --dynamic-deps=y default? This feels like lying about
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 13:43 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/11/2015 01:16 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 10:56 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/11/2015 08:48 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 11:58 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/08/2015 10:01 AM,
On 03/14/2015 05:55 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 10:51 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/13/2015 05:08 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 17:51 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/12/2015 02:43 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
Why is --dynamic-deps=y default? This
On 03/14/2015 09:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 13:43 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/11/2015 01:16 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 10:56 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/11/2015 08:48 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Sun, 2015-03-08 at 11:58 -0700, Zac
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 10:58 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/14/2015 05:55 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 10:51 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/13/2015 05:08 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 17:51 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/12/2015 02:43 PM,
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 11:08 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/14/2015 09:12 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 13:43 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/11/2015 01:16 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Wed, 2015-03-11 at 10:56 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/11/2015 08:48 AM,
On 03/14/2015 11:35 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Sat, 2015-03-14 at 10:58 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/14/2015 05:55 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Fri, 2015-03-13 at 10:51 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 03/13/2015 05:08 AM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Thu, 2015-03-12 at 17:51 -0700, Zac
32 matches
Mail list logo
