On 03/14/2015 18:25, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
This is a mostly inconsequential issue, but the Git migration provides
us a chance to make a clean break...
The repository of our ebuilds and the name of the CVS module have been
called gentoo-x86 since the start of Gentoo, because it originally
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:25:56 +
Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
Questions:
0. What names for the tree/repository.
git://anongit.gentoo.org/portage-tree.git ?
1. afaik everyone is calling it this way already anyway.
2. Since it is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Thu, 19 Mar 2015 12:32:41 +0100
Jan Matejka y...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:25:56 +
Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
Questions:
0. What names for the
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (19 Mar 2015)
# Dead for years, unmaintained, doesn't respect CFLAGS,
# bug 240842. Removal in a month.
media-video/maven-prog
# Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org (19 Mar 2015)
# Dead, doesn't build, doesn't respect CFLAGS (#240902).
# Removal in a month.
net-im/ntame
#
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:39 AM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote:
It is that ebuild tree that is the core to
what makes it a gentoo system.
I think this is really the heart of your argument and others who feel
gentoo is the best name for the repository.
I'm not going to argue against
We're following the upstream default for that. When the upstream
default changes to gtk+:3 then so will the ebuild. Currently the
gtk+:3 gui is listed as experimental.
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 5:00 PM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/19/2015 09:38 PM, Lars Wendler (polynomial-c)
On 03/19/2015 09:38 PM, Lars Wendler (polynomial-c) wrote:
Index: freeciv-2.5.0.ebuild
===
# Copyright 1999-2015 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2
# $Header:
On 03/19/2015 10:17 PM, Michael Sterrett wrote:
We're following the upstream default for that. When the upstream
default changes to gtk+:3 then so will the ebuild. Currently the
gtk+:3 gui is listed as experimental.
I don't find any reference that the gtk3 client is experimental.
El jue, 19-03-2015 a las 22:56 +0100, hasufell escribió:
On 03/19/2015 10:17 PM, Michael Sterrett wrote:
We're following the upstream default for that. When the upstream
default changes to gtk+:3 then so will the ebuild. Currently the
gtk+:3 gui is listed as experimental.
I don't
