Re: [gentoo-dev] CGA Web™ graphics standards

2015-04-02 Thread Ultrabug
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 01/04/2015 20:29, Joshua Kinard wrote: Arguably the best 04/01 gag I've seen today. Can we keep this? It'll make browsing the site on old SGI machines so much easier... +1, very good job guys it made my day. Thank you ! -BEGIN PGP

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Dynamic USE dependencies

2015-04-02 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: So I'm basically having trouble with groking the logic you're proposing of add a new use flag - implied change of useflag - rebuild when useflags change - but don't rebuild for this useflag change using some kind of

[gentoo-dev] last rites: dev-perl/Eidetic app-admin/rackview

2015-04-02 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 # Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org (2 Apr 2015) # Ancient, dead upstream. File collisions (bug 535700) # and build failures (bug 277670). Masked for removal in # 30 days. dev-perl/Eidetic app-admin/rackview - -- Andreas K. Huettel Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] libressl status

2015-04-02 Thread Hanno Böck
On Thu, 2 Apr 2015 16:49:20 -0700 Paul B. Henson hen...@acm.org wrote: What is the current status/thoughts regarding libressl? Reviewing the bug and some past threads, it sounds like the initial plan was to make openssl a virtual and let either classic openssl or libressl fulfull it? I'm not

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] repoman: fix dependency.unknown to ignore USE deps (bug 525376)

2015-04-02 Thread Zac Medico
The surrounding code is ignorant of USE flags, because it calls use_reduce(matchall=True), therefore it makes sense for the dependency.unknown code to ignore USE deps. X-Gentoo-Bug: 525376 X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=525376 --- [PATCH v2] only changes the bug

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Dynamic USE dependencies

2015-04-02 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:10 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Rich Freeman posted on Thu, 02 Apr 2015 12:32:41 -0400 as excerpted: Out of curiosity, what is keeping us from having USE flag dependencies handled dynamically, in the same way that package dependencies are? If portage can

[gentoo-dev] libressl status

2015-04-02 Thread Paul B. Henson
What is the current status/thoughts regarding libressl? Reviewing the bug and some past threads, it sounds like the initial plan was to make openssl a virtual and let either classic openssl or libressl fulfull it? I'm not sure if things have changed from that viewpoint, but it really doesn't seem

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Dynamic USE dependencies

2015-04-02 Thread Duncan
Rich Freeman posted on Thu, 02 Apr 2015 12:32:41 -0400 as excerpted: Out of curiosity, what is keeping us from having USE flag dependencies handled dynamically, in the same way that package dependencies are? If portage can figure out that I need libxml2 installed even if I don't put it in

[gentoo-portage-dev] Dynamic USE dependencies

2015-04-02 Thread Rich Freeman
Out of curiosity, what is keeping us from having USE flag dependencies handled dynamically, in the same way that package dependencies are? If portage can figure out that I need libxml2 installed even if I don't put it in /var/lib/portage/world, why can't it figure out that I need it built with

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Dynamic USE dependencies

2015-04-02 Thread Kent Fredric
On 3 April 2015 at 05:32, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: Out of curiosity, what is keeping us from having USE flag dependencies handled dynamically, in the same way that package dependencies are? If portage can figure out that I need libxml2 installed even if I don't put it in

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Dynamic USE dependencies

2015-04-02 Thread Rich Freeman
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Kent Fredric kentfred...@gmail.com wrote: On 3 April 2015 at 05:32, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: Out of curiosity, what is keeping us from having USE flag dependencies handled dynamically, in the same way that package dependencies are? If portage can

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Dynamic USE dependencies

2015-04-02 Thread Kent Fredric
On 3 April 2015 at 06:32, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: Why is this necessary? If a USE flag changes, just rebuild the application. Isn't the nature of your proposal,( that is, dynamic deps for USE flags ) inherently Use flags change, _dont_ rebuild the application ? :) It may help

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] repoman: fix dependency.unknown to ignore USE deps (bug 545294)

2015-04-02 Thread Zac Medico
The surrounding code is ignorant of USE flags, because it calls use_reduce(matchall=True), therefore it makes sense for the dependency.unknown code to ignore USE deps. X-Gentoo-Bug: 545294 X-Gentoo-Bug-URL: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=545294 --- bin/repoman | 5 +++-- 1 file changed,