[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Service relaunch: anongit.gentoo.org; anonymous git checkouts via git:// and http://

2015-04-20 Thread Robin H. Johnson
FYI, I have now turned off the old hostnames. git://overlays.gentoo.org/ git://*.overlays.gentoo.org/ git://anon.gentoo.org/ git+ssh://overlays.gentoo.org/ git+ssh://*.overlays.gentoo.org/ On Tue, Mar 03, 2015 at 08:42:54AM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: Full anonymous Git service has returned.

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK

2015-04-20 Thread Zac Medico
These are in the master branch now: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=5a1b870fe54ac06f864a648c3ea5cc118f6ce911 https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=e74e2670e3f043608fced9847e54bdbb19f35169 On 04/20/2015 12:45 PM, Bertrand Jaquin wrote: #

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK

2015-04-20 Thread Zac Medico
On 04/20/2015 05:31 PM, Bertrand Jacquin wrote: On 21/04/2015 00:39, Zac Medico wrote: These are in the master branch now: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=5a1b870fe54ac06f864a648c3ea5cc118f6ce911

[gentoo-dev] Should this be considered a gcc bug?

2015-04-20 Thread grozin
Hello *, There was a bug #526194 - dev-lisp/sbcl does not respect CFLAGS. It was fixed by Mark Wright gie...@gentoo.org on Jan 31 - Feb 1. However, after this fix the upstream CFLAGS were appended to the user-supplyed ${CFLAGS}. And the upstream CFLAGS contain -O3. So, is a user has, e.g.,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should this be considered a gcc bug?

2015-04-20 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hi, On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:57:16 +0600 (NOVT) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello *, There was a bug #526194 - dev-lisp/sbcl does not respect CFLAGS. It was fixed by Mark Wright gie...@gentoo.org on Jan 31 - Feb 1. However, after this fix the upstream CFLAGS were appended to the user-supplyed

Re: [gentoo-dev] Should this be considered a gcc bug?

2015-04-20 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 21 Apr 2015 09:57:16 +0600 (NOVT) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: However, after this fix the upstream CFLAGS were appended to the user-supplyed ${CFLAGS}. And the upstream CFLAGS contain -O3. There is your problem. We filter out those compiler flags that affect the output, so -O3 should go

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 1/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more quiet when removing non existing INSTALL_MASK

2015-04-20 Thread Bertrand Jaquin
From: Bertrand Jacquin bertr...@jacquin.bzh When FEATURES=nodoc noinfo noman is used, you will get the following output for every packages, even virtual that contain no file: # FEATURES=nodoc noinfo noman emerge -va1t virtual/cron .. Installing (1 of 1) virtual/cron-0::gentoo *

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCHv3 2/2] MEDIUM: misc-functions: Be more verbose when removing INSTALL_MASK glob

2015-04-20 Thread Bertrand Jaquin
From: Bertrand Jacquin bertr...@jacquin.bzh When glob are defined in INSTALL_MASK, no output is given on what file has been deleted. The following patch provide more information to user about what is actually removed. Example: # INSTALL_MASK='*.h' emerge -va1t x11-proto/xproto ..