On 04 Jun 2015 14:10, William Hubbs wrote:
> # @ECLASS: go-live.eclass
since we're going to have a common go eclass, and i don't think we'll want to
call it "go.eclass", this too probably should not be go-xxx. if we assume the
base one will be "golang.eclass", then this should be golang-xxx.ecl
On 04 Jun 2015 21:46, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
> В письме от Чт, 4 июня 2015 11:17:01 пользователь Mike Frysinger написал:
> > if you have a bug to report, please use bugs.gentoo.org
>
> I bet, "bug" will deprecate itself before even bug wranglers takes a look on
> it.
i don't know what
On Thu, Jun 04, 2015 at 12:27:39PM -0700, Andrew Udvare wrote:
>
> > On 2015-06-04, at 12:10, William Hubbs wrote:
> >
> > All,
> >
> > we are starting to get more go packages in the tree, so we need an
> > eclass that properly deals with go live ebuilds.
>
> Why live only?
>
> Your eclass do
> On 2015-06-04, at 12:10, William Hubbs wrote:
>
> All,
>
> we are starting to get more go packages in the tree, so we need an
> eclass that properly deals with go live ebuilds.
Why live only?
Your eclass does what every other live and non-live ebuild does for Go: create
a temporary Go envi
All,
we are starting to get more go packages in the tree, so we need an
eclass that properly deals with go live ebuilds.
Attached you will find my proposal for this eclass. I will commit it on
6 Jun UTC if there is no feedback, so let me know what you think.
Thanks,
William
# Copyright 1999-20
On 04/06/15 11:46 AM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote:
> В письме от Чт, 4 июня 2015 11:17:01 пользователь Mike Frysinger написал:
>> if you have a bug to report, please use bugs.gentoo.org
>> -mike
>
> I bet, "bug" will deprecate itself before even bug wranglers takes a look on
> it.
>
excelle
В письме от Чт, 4 июня 2015 11:17:01 пользователь Mike Frysinger написал:
> if you have a bug to report, please use bugs.gentoo.org
> -mike
I bet, "bug" will deprecate itself before even bug wranglers takes a look on
it.
--
Best regards,
mva
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally sign
if you have a bug to report, please use bugs.gentoo.org
-mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Please notice the dates:
basename "2",
symlink: "3"
e.g. (details below):
portage-20150602.tar.xz
portage-latest.tar.bz2 -> portage-20150603.tar.bz2
-rw-r--r--1 0 063350040 Jun 4 05:07
portage-20150602.tar.xz
-rw-r--r--1 0 0
On 6/3/15 10:56 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> The chromium build issue is a point of some contention; see the bug below.
>
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=471810
>
> I agree that it makes sense to check virtual memory. I guess that
> would be MemTotal + SwapTotal in /proc/meminfo.
>
> It w
10 matches
Mail list logo
