Re: [gentoo-dev] Introduce ppc64le architecture into gentoo ! please share your comments
On 10/21/2015 04:55 AM, Kevin Zhao wrote: > Hi Guys, We have finish compiling stage3 for ppc64 (little-endian).Here is > the link: > > https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B2k84p6709AyTFlwLUF1WjlxUk0/view?usp=sharing Awesome! > Now we are going to build LiveCD using stage3. Could you help to give > some demo or a guide for building LiveCD? That will help we a lot to make > effort. > Thanks ~ I suggest asking in #gentoo-releng on freenode or the Gentoo release engineering mailing ilst. > > > 2015-09-27 3:16 GMT+08:00 Anthony G. Basile: > >> On 9/24/15 8:23 AM, Leno Hou wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Again, please apply POWER8 Systems and join our work :-) >>> [1]: https://www.runabove.com/instances/ibm-power8.xml >>> [2]: https://ptopenlab.com/cloudlabconsole/#/ >>> [3]: http://osuosl.org/services/powerdev/request_hosting >>> >>> >>> -Leno Hou >> I have applied to osuosl for an ibm power8 ppc64le node. I've put myself >> down as the point-of-contact. I asked for openstack gui access and will >> try to build a system using Leno's stage3. I'm not sure what the env looks >> like right now, but i assume i'll have to boot off a cd image. I'll use >> debians. I guess I could be macho and try to build everything from >> scratch, cross compile a kernel and all, but time. >> >> Has anyone tried qemu simulating ppc64le on amd64? Lu I thought you said >> you tried on x86 and it didn't work. >> >> >> >> -- >> Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. >> Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] >> E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org >> GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA >> GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA >> >> > signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: net-p2p/deluge/
Monday 23 Nov 2015 18:18:49, Robin H. Johnson wrote : > On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 01:22:14PM +, Patrice Clement wrote: > > commit: 19c9530e8cf386649a0815cd532d24f6e7261867 > > Author: Paolo Pedroni users noreply github > > com> > > AuthorDate: Tue Nov 17 10:31:30 2015 + > > Commit: Patrice Clement gentoo org> > > CommitDate: Mon Nov 23 13:17:37 2015 + > > URL:https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=19c9530e > > > > net-p2p/deluge: Version bump. Fixes bug 561398. > > > > Gentoo-Bug: 561398 > > > > net-p2p/deluge/{deluge-1.3.11.ebuild => deluge-1.3.12.ebuild} | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > This commit did NOT include any new Manifest entry, so stopped > replication to rsync (because we verify all Manifests now). > > If you git-pull/merge new ebuilds, please make sure you update the > Manifest! > > -- > Robin Hugh Johnson > Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead, Foundation Trustee > E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org > GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 > Oops. Thanks for the heads up and for fixing it. -- Patrice Clement Gentoo Linux developer http://www.gentoo.org
[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: net-p2p/deluge/
On Mon, Nov 23, 2015 at 01:22:14PM +, Patrice Clement wrote: > commit: 19c9530e8cf386649a0815cd532d24f6e7261867 > Author: Paolo Pedroni users noreply github > com> > AuthorDate: Tue Nov 17 10:31:30 2015 + > Commit: Patrice Clement gentoo org> > CommitDate: Mon Nov 23 13:17:37 2015 + > URL:https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=19c9530e > > net-p2p/deluge: Version bump. Fixes bug 561398. > > Gentoo-Bug: 561398 > > net-p2p/deluge/{deluge-1.3.11.ebuild => deluge-1.3.12.ebuild} | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) This commit did NOT include any new Manifest entry, so stopped replication to rsync (because we verify all Manifests now). If you git-pull/merge new ebuilds, please make sure you update the Manifest! -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Infrastructure Lead, Foundation Trustee E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] SyncManager: redirect command stderr to stdout (bug 566132)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Sorry for not being up to date what this does, but the bug complains specifically about GitHub mirrors, while the patch itself seems far more invasive. Is it the case that they should *never* go to STDERR? - -- Alexander berna...@gentoo.org https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWUuzpAAoJENQqWdRUGk8BMdQQAKACO5bGwnXxbyNRuh/KzIiH e38mzzvxDibJTTz32XSsOn1w9StZkSWAcDwT8Ef4QGeQJxmLTXUW+5eUsAVoaNxy VY81iQbDmcSf+erljYEuUBBOFDMORYGwhSROdvvLE/0d3LFP6AurWx9a4kb229j7 DB8HmpjXkkpT65YgJvp2vD51x+K5HsDOKTObBcDreiea21u2X6DNcGbVOK35IXs3 fbTovSrL39qTk8zPSvuwePHlfWelsTCmj/+2EmLVJMTem/cTo0uxCfGCOmwALusk FI4YcV1zf1cMrL1tqU9B7bYSH8oci4Rfs80IanieDwpd59V32xQ8ckyOP8ME5gG/ xbqipfwbWJyyUFErL7BZE9/H90tib9uofR9mxP9BylXjsDMbu/sC7OA2ElBNVilp TJGvmRb3jdIWsSddNsOgdN2XofR20G5Ow/NKEvpueM42Pk4s6lqYwZODmsU5kOsS wSw6ErQO6RCKfu0iQhQo3VS4EjP95sVl21nXtJk6v8AkNwNkU1TNZ8f1Ds5CaALR 79XpFL3JQy/zwd0uMY7kOjgezJJeu4nhfSz2k1ZDNLHokTcqhqR4WdXqzkWA2iZq Y6p6CLWY57TIiih0ASt+NSfrkRl1628irZyVcyoVKDpaWCVcWq+G1sAl4pmAXpXV nVhyL0zqartr+TNlFz2N =g6l5 -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 10/29] python-utils-r1.eclass: Make heredocs consistent
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 22/11/15 20:50, Micha? Górny wrote: > --- eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass | 10 +- 1 file changed, 5 > insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass > b/eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass index 7617c3f..6fb1ec5 100644 --- > a/eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass +++ > b/eclass/python-utils-r1.eclass @@ -933,11 +933,11 @@ > python_wrapper_setup() { > > local x for x in "${nonsupp[@]}"; do -cat > >"${workdir}"/bin/${x} > <<__EOF__ || die -#!/bin/sh -echo "${x} is not supported by > ${EPYTHON}" >&2 -exit 127 -__EOF__ + cat > >"${workdir}"/bin/${x} > <<-_EOF_ || die + #!/bin/sh + > echo "${x} is not supported by > ${EPYTHON}" >&2 + exit 127 +_EOF_ Why not indenting this line? -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0 iQJ8BAEBCgBmBQJWUvCNXxSAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ0QUU0N0I4NzFERUI0MTJFN0EyODE0NUFF OTQwMkE3OUIwMzUyOUEyAAoJEOlAKnmwNSmiqWwQAJaI+wQ35CBxT7ZSxLMBtA3x TtafJinkacJBbSzxgXHnQ/RprAoRO6Utg2ijJh3rYxu8LCD6Al/iF23MtcdzhBWe oU6KXVzCQI5A+47EFDGifD+GHWkIDwcCepKF+4xKpUGSeN4sxLrENAXt4YysjFPo QN29+zx4IAsCj/EZmi5ViVCZGA2UdedCkbwbhXUJ5hYXNAS1XPQjFvVCKWp57Ayt Njj4sVgOJB7kWcZYV6URzv1TFPENSbEI3/H3RpVJAQCnzQLDux0Evy5dNlBG73RU OnX2mXdZYWibIYgLR6zCtZpiOKcmiIOBlx/PZSgT0ylrHsgzPt7+WY3AEZxtcr+X 9Hii2Qb4WfOXAaVIDSIwUgg44AVSKY5yz+IRmQ6Q7L7u4qmQUMs6JEIb4LJ2oCRH wbmA/D3exiVEGTzeKI3DQnupkpCeEdtY70R38DmI7Jv6vyLI8mvxw/muTaDh2wF7 7PB3S1HPYsfoje+7GO9g4Bq0xVwssn4XqIvRzwO82nbGHCLA8kPT4q0sevl5iUQY c+g8X4n34re/wj/uH0j1skkx49VNrZvd0HZ7JzT4XcGK6s673SK8pcJLlYzjInpF IO4PqBZkRkYPPhyfj8YjbtluquPtQExVBAAQOWF/LlZ9AzHhxkgoxv4lwxFK56/l NPR5/VPzuJOHWB5pcG2C =XqEp -END PGP SIGNATURE-
Re: [gentoo-dev] [EAPI 7] The future goals for PORTDIR, ECLASSDIR and... LICENSEDIR?
> On Sun, 22 Nov 2015, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sat, 21 Nov 2015 18:49:03 -0500 > Ian Stakenviciuswrote: >> All told, I think i'm in favour of banning the variables, and >> potentially providing getter functions that would output the path >> of these files if they need to be accessed -- '$(get_eclasspath >> [name])' or $(get_licensepath [name]) or the like. I don't know if >> these could be implemented in-eclass or if they would be something >> that would have to be added to EAPI7..? The more I think about the idea of having a LICENSEDIR containing symlinks, the less I like it. It would add the overhead of creating the dir to all ebuilds, whereas it would be used in a handful of cases only. Also the symlinks won't be permanent, so postinst messages like "read the license at ${LICENSEDIR}/GPL-2" cannot be used, unless the ebuild would follow the link (e.g. using readlink) which seems clumsy. So IMO a function like get_license_path is the better solution here. > And if I understand your idea correctly, get_licensepath would still > not work for binary packages. Is there a scenario where LICENSEDIR would work, but the function would not? Ulrich pgpJpFTb9Bxmk.pgp Description: PGP signature
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] SyncManager: redirect command stderr to stdout (bug 566132)
On 11/23/2015 02:39 AM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > Sorry for not being up to date what this does, but the bug complains > specifically about GitHub mirrors, while the patch itself seems far > more invasive. Is it the case that they should *never* go to STDERR? Since the sync modules can call a variety of different commands, it's hard to predict which ones will unnecessarily write to stderr. So, the assumption here is that the process exit status is a more reliable indicator for errors. For example, the python code in GitSync will write an error message to stderr if the git process exits with non-zero status. -- Thanks, Zac
[gentoo-dev] rfc: dev-lang/go prefix patch hard coding a path to a binary
All, there is a patch to dev-lang/go that was added a while back w/o consulting me [1]. I eventually did review the patch, and I see that it hard codes a path to the sysctl binary on OSx. In my view, prefix or not, we shouldn't be patching software to hard code paths to binaries; we should be fixing PATH instead. Thoughts? William [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=558368 signature.asc Description: Digital signature