I know only eset, kaspersky and old and unsupported clamav.
On 01/12/2016 12:20 PM, Michael Palimaka wrote:
I am announcing the antivirus project[1], to replace the old herd in
preparation for the implementation of GLEP 67.
1: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Antivirus
I am announcing the antivirus project[1], to replace the old herd in
preparation for the implementation of GLEP 67.
1: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Antivirus
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
LGTM.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWlP7QAAoJENQqWdRUGk8BbDcP/R/nMpd6kvrRuggoaqFLB50R
On Sat, 9 Jan 2016 23:10:43 +
James Le Cuirot wrote:
> I'm mulling over the idea of dropping Java on 32-bit ppc. Having
> personally used Gentoo on this hardware myself in the past, I've
> resisted the temptation to drop it sooner but I think it's time to
> throw in the
---
pym/portage/xml/metadata.py | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/pym/portage/xml/metadata.py b/pym/portage/xml/metadata.py
index fcd9dc0..33b9779 100644
--- a/pym/portage/xml/metadata.py
+++ b/pym/portage/xml/metadata.py
@@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ class _Maintainer(object):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
LGTM.
- --
Alexander
berna...@gentoo.org
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJWlP8MAAoJENQqWdRUGk8B2lMP/0PEe5zwEQzesacPogONqsB5
Hello, everyone.
With a little delay, I'd like to announce that the 2016-01-10 Council
meeting (log [1], no summary yet) has resulted in the current
wording of GLEP67 being approved ([2], not yet moved to [3]).
Considering the progress so far (tracked in [4]), the Council has set
the deadline
There are several ebuilds that repeat the same checks and need to
perform the same duties when it comes to working with PostgreSQL. For
example, making sure the users' currently slot is compatible with the
ebuild requirements. postgres.eclass addresses this and has
additional conveniences to build
On Mon, 28 Dec 2015 09:17:55 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Sun, 27 Dec 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > ---
> > bin/phase-functions.sh | 9 +
> > 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> > diff --git a/bin/phase-functions.sh b/bin/phase-functions.sh
> > index
On 12.01.2016 20:22, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
> There are several ebuilds that repeat the same checks and need to
> perform the same duties when it comes to working with PostgreSQL. For
> example, making sure the users' currently slot is compatible with the
> ebuild requirements. postgres.eclass
In its last meeting the council has accepted an extension of the
news item format which allows EAPI=5 style package dependency
specifications. This has triggered a discussion if this change is
backwards or forwards compatible, and what should be the new format's
version number [1]. Also it is not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
I don't see why backwards compatibility would be a problem. The older news
format spec supports fewer features, so the new spec should be much like newer
EAPIs and 'just work'.
I'm in favor of all the changes you laid out. A good number of us are
12 matches
Mail list logo