[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro

Rich Freeman posted on Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:22:36 -0500 as excerpted: > 4. In the runlevel paradigm you usually think of services running > inside a runlevel (perhaps this isn't strictly true, but most people > think this way, in part because runlevels don't change much). In > systemd this

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] getgccversion: check for clang if gcc is not found

In Gentoo Prefix on Mac OS X systems, LLVM/clang is used as the toolchain, so no gcc/gcc-config around. Probe for clang after we failed to locate gcc, so we can show clang version instead. --- pym/_emerge/actions.py | 39 ++- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+),

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] consider clang when looking up compiler version

This is a patch from prefix branch to make the compiler detection consider clang. Fabian Groffen (1): getgccversion: check for clang if gcc is not found pym/_emerge/actions.py | 39 ++- 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) -- 2.7.0

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro

On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 3:57 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:46:34 -0500 as excerpted: > >> When systemd says "target" - think "virtual service." The equivalent in >> openrc would be an init.d script that has dependencies but which doesn't >>

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-util/vdkbuilder

# Michael Palimaka (18 Feb 2016) # Fails to build. Dead upstream. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 574248. dev-util/vdkbuilder

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:11 PM, Richard Yao wrote: > > dracut does not assist those who do not want generic kernel > configurations. Unfortunately, the handbook does not do a good job in > saying that the initramfs generation and generic kernel configurations > are optional. >

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: gnome-extra/connman-gnome

# Michael Palimaka (18 Feb 2016) # Fails to build. Dead upstream. Use net-misc/connman-gtk instead. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 502552. gnome-extra/connman-gnome

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-tv/wis-go7007

# Michael Palimaka (18 Feb 2016) # Fails to build with recent kernels. Dead upstream. # Use kernel driver VIDEO_GO7007 instead. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 482120.

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-video/stk11xx

# Michael Palimaka (18 Feb 2016) # Fails to build with recent kernels. Dead upstream. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug 488128. media-video/stk11xx

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro

On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:02 PM, Richard Yao wrote: > > Dracut handling it well is not up for dispute. When I checked last year, > dracut simply did not tell systemd to use this functionality because it > was unnecessary functionality that only served to slowed down the >

Re: [gentoo-dev] BOINC needs maintainer

Am Donnerstag, 18. Februar 2016, 09:37:28 CET schrieb David Seifert: > On Do, 2016-02-18 at 09:29 +0100, Sven Eden wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 17. Februar 2016, 15:20:56 CET schrieb Justin Lecher > > > > (jlec): > > > currently BOINC supposed to be maintained by the science team, but > > > we > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro

On Wed, 17 Feb 2016 22:11:42 -0500 Richard Yao wrote: > dracut does not assist those who do not want generic kernel > configurations. Unfortunately, the handbook does not do a good job in > saying that the initramfs generation and generic kernel configurations > are optional.

[gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: Does OpenRC really need mount-ro

Rich Freeman posted on Wed, 17 Feb 2016 08:46:34 -0500 as excerpted: > On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: >> >> Initial shutdown is via two targets (as opposed to specific services), > > Since not everybody in this thread may be familiar with systemd, I'll >

Re: [gentoo-dev] BOINC needs maintainer

On Do, 2016-02-18 at 09:29 +0100, Sven Eden wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 17. Februar 2016, 15:20:56 CET schrieb Justin Lecher > (jlec): > > currently BOINC supposed to be maintained by the science team, but > > we > > are not really carrying about it. Is there anyone around whole > > likes to > > take

Re: [gentoo-dev] BOINC needs maintainer

Am Mittwoch, 17. Februar 2016, 15:20:56 CET schrieb Justin Lecher (jlec): > currently BOINC supposed to be maintained by the science team, but we > are not really carrying about it. Is there anyone around whole likes to > take this over? I have a sci-misc/boinc-7.6 ebuild in my overlay "seden"