On 03/02/2016 08:48 PM, malc wrote:
> I still fail to understand the bikeshedding here - you really don't
> need a git checkout to get something akin to a changelog. Use the
> github API directly...
>
> The following 1-liner could be trivially productised (maybe even parse
> $PWD to set the path
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:48 PM, malc wrote:
> I still fail to understand the bikeshedding here - you really don't
> need a git checkout to get something akin to a changelog. Use the
> github API directly...
>
The main downside to using github would be that you don't get a
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> For example, the message of the initial commit 56bd759 appears in some
> 18000 files, which accounts for 25 MiB.
Not discounting the general issue, I wouldn't count the initial
commit. All that space will get taken up
I still fail to understand the bikeshedding here - you really don't
need a git checkout to get something akin to a changelog. Use the
github API directly...
The following 1-liner could be trivially productised (maybe even parse
$PWD to set the path argument...)
curl
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
> On 02/03/16 03:50 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> How is it possible that we have 52 MiB of ChangeLog entries
>> generated in the 0.5 years since the git conversion, whereas we had
>> only a total of 103 MiB in the 13.5 years since ChangeLogs were
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/03/16 03:50 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> How is it possible that we have 52 MiB of ChangeLog entries
> generated in the 0.5 years since the git conversion, whereas we
> had only a total of 103 MiB in the 13.5 years since ChangeLogs
> were
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote:
> Remove the long form of element that was likely used (or
> supposed to be used) in the global metadata scope. It is currently
> referenced in element only, and judging from the comments,
> it is supposed to always be a URL there.
Apparently the
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Remove the long form of element that was likely used (or
> supposed to be used) in the global metadata scope. It is currently
> referenced in element only, and judging from the comments,
> it is supposed to always be a
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Robin H Johnson wrote:
> I just hadn't finished putting the results into a long-term format
> quite yet, but did so this afternoon:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~robbat2/201602-portage-survey/
Thank you.
> Some remarks about question #2 and #3:
> Q2: Reduce local disk