Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Portage repo usage survey and change evaluation

2016-03-02 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 03/02/2016 08:48 PM, malc wrote: > I still fail to understand the bikeshedding here - you really don't > need a git checkout to get something akin to a changelog. Use the > github API directly... > > The following 1-liner could be trivially productised (maybe even parse > $PWD to set the path

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Portage repo usage survey and change evaluation

2016-03-02 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 2:48 PM, malc wrote: > I still fail to understand the bikeshedding here - you really don't > need a git checkout to get something akin to a changelog. Use the > github API directly... > The main downside to using github would be that you don't get a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Portage repo usage survey and change evaluation

2016-03-02 Thread Rich Freeman
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 1:14 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > For example, the message of the initial commit 56bd759 appears in some > 18000 files, which accounts for 25 MiB. Not discounting the general issue, I wouldn't count the initial commit. All that space will get taken up

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Portage repo usage survey and change evaluation

2016-03-02 Thread malc
I still fail to understand the bikeshedding here - you really don't need a git checkout to get something akin to a changelog. Use the github API directly... The following 1-liner could be trivially productised (maybe even parse $PWD to set the path argument...) curl

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Portage repo usage survey and change evaluation

2016-03-02 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > On 02/03/16 03:50 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> How is it possible that we have 52 MiB of ChangeLog entries >> generated in the 0.5 years since the git conversion, whereas we had >> only a total of 103 MiB in the 13.5 years since ChangeLogs were

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Portage repo usage survey and change evaluation

2016-03-02 Thread Ian Stakenvicius
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/03/16 03:50 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > How is it possible that we have 52 MiB of ChangeLog entries > generated in the 0.5 years since the git conversion, whereas we > had only a total of 103 MiB in the 13.5 years since ChangeLogs > were

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH dtd] Remove outdated definition of global-scope

2016-03-02 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > Remove the long form of element that was likely used (or > supposed to be used) in the global metadata scope. It is currently > referenced in element only, and judging from the comments, > it is supposed to always be a URL there. Apparently the

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH dtd] Remove outdated definition of global-scope

2016-03-02 Thread Dirkjan Ochtman
On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:38 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Remove the long form of element that was likely used (or > supposed to be used) in the global metadata scope. It is currently > referenced in element only, and judging from the comments, > it is supposed to always be a

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] Portage repo usage survey and change evaluation

2016-03-02 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Wed, 2 Mar 2016, Robin H Johnson wrote: > I just hadn't finished putting the results into a long-term format > quite yet, but did so this afternoon: > http://dev.gentoo.org/~robbat2/201602-portage-survey/ Thank you. > Some remarks about question #2 and #3: > Q2: Reduce local disk