Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-util/nsis: Maintainer request

On 05/06/16 22:55, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > dev-util/nsis curretly has no maintainer. It has a [critical security > bug filed against it]. Does anyone want to pick it up? if not we'll > start a last rite process for it. > > [critical security bug filed against it] >

[gentoo-dev] News item: LINGUAS USE_EXPAND renamed to L10N

First draft of news item for proceeding with LINGUAS USE_EXPAND rename to L10N independently of the INSTALL_MASK feature additions. I hope English natives will improve the sentence flow and grammar here :) Perhaps there's also a better title than with the technical USE_EXPAND mention. Title:

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2016-06-05 23:59 UTC

The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2016-06-05 23:59 UTC. Removals: dev-lang/dmd-bin 20160601-16:05 kensington 83cf900 net-misc/asterisk-spandsp_codec_g726 20160605-15:40 kensington 53ee70c net-p2p/nap

Re: [gentoo-dev] app-text/htmltidy: Maintainer Request

Sunday 05 Jun 2016 19:39:26, Yury German wrote : > app-text/htmltidy currently has no maintainers. It has a vulnerability > [Security Bug] filed against it. And a number of other [package depend > on it]. Is nyone willing to pick it up? > > [Secuity Bug] >

[gentoo-dev] app-text/htmltidy: Maintainer Request

app-text/htmltidy currently has no maintainers. It has a vulnerability [Security Bug] filed against it. And a number of other [package depend on it]. Is nyone willing to pick it up? [Secuity Bug] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=561452 [package depend on it]

[gentoo-dev] dev-util/nsis: Maintainer request

dev-util/nsis curretly has no maintainer. It has a [critical security bug filed against it]. Does anyone want to pick it up? if not we'll start a last rite process for it. [critical security bug filed against it] https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=568398 -- Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: dev-util/{...}

On Sun, 5 Jun 2016 13:47:48 +0200 Patrice Clement wrote: > # Patrice Clement (5 Jun 2016) > # Unmaintained ebuilds. Upstream is either dead or AWOL. Also, most of these > # ebuilds are still sitting in ~arch after years in the tree. Excuse me, but since when and based on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

On 06/05/2016 02:05 PM, james wrote: > On 06/05/2016 12:15 PM, Daniel Campbell (zlg) wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA512 >> >> On June 5, 2016 9:04:26 AM PDT, "Michał Górny" wrote: >>> Hello, everyone. >>> >>> I have the pleasure to announce that a few

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

On 06/05/2016 12:15 PM, Daniel Campbell (zlg) wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On June 5, 2016 9:04:26 AM PDT, "Michał Górny" wrote: Hello, everyone. I have the pleasure to announce that a few improvements have been deployed by the Repository mirror &

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: dev-util/{...}

On 05/06/16 20:04, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Patrice Clement wrote: >> dev-util/cdecl >> dev-util/dwarves >> dev-util/intel2gas >> dev-util/lsuio >> dev-util/mock >> dev-util/par >> dev-util/tinlink >> dev-util/usb-robot > I've used the above subset of

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: dev-util/{...}

On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:47:48PM +0200, Patrice Clement wrote: > dev-util/cdecl > dev-util/dwarves > dev-util/intel2gas > dev-util/lsuio > dev-util/mock > dev-util/par > dev-util/tinlink > dev-util/usb-robot I've used the above subset of these, so I'll review the upstreams to see if they just

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

On 6 June 2016 at 05:34, rindeal wrote: > efore merging to master they do a rebase+force push, > let the CI check it, and if it passes they're allowed to merge it. No > cherry-picking involved. Master is then always clean and happy. I'm > not sure how well it scales, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

On 5 June 2016 at 19:13, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 6 June 2016 at 05:09, rindeal wrote: >> It is not, unless CI filters the broken commits in some miraculous >> way. With the current approach, both stable and master branch will >> contain the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On June 5, 2016 9:04:26 AM PDT, "Michał Górny" wrote: >Hello, everyone. > >I have the pleasure to announce that a few improvements have been >deployed by the Repository mirror & CI project today. > > >1. The mirror for 'gentoo'

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

On 6 June 2016 at 05:09, rindeal wrote: > It is not, unless CI filters the broken commits in some miraculous > way. With the current approach, both stable and master branch will > contain the pollution of broken commits + their fixes, instead of > having good commits only.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

On 05/06/16 18:09, rindeal wrote: > On 5 June 2016 at 18:53, M. J. Everitt wrote: >> On 05/06/16 17:49, rindeal wrote: >>> On 5 June 2016 at 18:40, Kent Fredric wrote: On 6 June 2016 at 04:31, rindeal wrote: > Isn't no

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

On 5 June 2016 at 18:53, M. J. Everitt wrote: > On 05/06/16 17:49, rindeal wrote: >> On 5 June 2016 at 18:40, Kent Fredric wrote: >>> On 6 June 2016 at 04:31, rindeal wrote: Isn't no commit approach better than having

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

On 6 June 2016 at 04:49, rindeal wrote: > I'd like to see the master branch free of commits which do not pass > CI, instead of having broken commits and holding master back until > revert commits are introduced. Just pretend "stable" is called "master" and pretend

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

On 5 June 2016 at 18:40, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 6 June 2016 at 04:31, rindeal wrote: >> Isn't no commit approach better than having broken commit + revert >> commit? > > > Huh? > > Its doing "replicate to github on pass using a merge commit". I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

On 6 June 2016 at 04:31, rindeal wrote: > Isn't no commit approach better than having broken commit + revert > commit? Huh? Its doing "replicate to github on pass using a merge commit". -- Kent KENTNL - https://metacpan.org/author/KENTNL

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

On 5 June 2016 at 18:04, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > I have the pleasure to announce that a few improvements have been > deployed by the Repository mirror & CI project today. > > > 1. The mirror for 'gentoo' repository [1] now has a default 'stable' > branch. It

[gentoo-dev] Repo mirror & CI project news: 'stable' gentoo branch, new repo stats, faster CI

Hello, everyone. I have the pleasure to announce that a few improvements have been deployed by the Repository mirror & CI project today. 1. The mirror for 'gentoo' repository [1] now has a default 'stable' branch. It is updated automatically by the gentoo-ci checker, and therefore always

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] flag-o-matic.eclass: bugfix for get-flag()

New version in available at https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/1425. Check it out, it's cool.

[gentoo-dev] [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: dev-util/{...}

# Patrice Clement (5 Jun 2016) # Unmaintained ebuilds. Upstream is either dead or AWOL. Also, most of these # ebuilds are still sitting in ~arch after years in the tree. # Masked for removal in 30 days. dev-util/ccmalloc dev-util/dwarves dev-util/tinlink dev-util/cdecl