Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 10:24:08AM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > sys-block/zram-init I'll take this, i use it on my laptops -- Jason

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 16:33:15 +1200 Kent Fredric wrote: > > so it is paused for a licensed > > download, as necessary, is not a show stopper > > The problem is that download requires a Browser with JavaScript > support, because it requires JavaScript to set a cookie, and

Re: Easy Installs / Stage 4 ( Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs )

On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 02:57:14PM -0500, james wrote: You should take a look at Blueness' Gentoo Reference stuff https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:RelEng_GRS https://blogs.gentoo.org/blueness/2015/07/31/the-gentoo-reference-system-suite-a-new-release-engineering-tool/

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On Mon, 8 Aug 2016 00:26:01 -0500 james wrote: > so it is paused for a licensed > download, as necessary, is not a show stopper The problem is that download requires a Browser with JavaScript support, because it requires JavaScript to set a cookie, and that cookie

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 16:49:01 -0500 james wrote: > After that feat is accomplished, then a similar deployment of a > gentoo cluster on a those just installed gentoo minimal images, via a > few keystrokes (I am flexible on the cluster codes that comprise the > cluster). Then

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2016-08-07 23:59 UTC

The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2016-08-07 23:59 UTC. Removals: app-admin/mate-system-tools 20160326-00:51 NP-Hardass927c8d1 app-mobilephone/freesmee20160807-17:21 mgorny41fe748 app-office/lotus

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On 08/07/2016 03:48 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote: Java works pretty well on Gentoo, I'm not quite sure what needs to be fixed ... I mean, apart from our insane idea to "build from source" which doesn't fit with the existing structures in the java ecosystem Wow!. Patrick, you are my hero. I have an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of Lua in Gentoo

Hi, I spoke with rafaelmartins today, and I have joined him as a co-maintainer for dev-lang/lua. We use it at the office, so I have an interest in taking it forward. My first plan is to find the latest version of Lua and look at the upstream build system to find out what we are doing that they

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On 08/07/2016 10:04 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: > On 07/08/2016 19:36, james wrote: >>> The interesting apps out there are mostly running python, go and >>> (sometimes) lua. And that's what I observe in my day job - >>> business/mobile ISP. >> >> >> Look at the job listing on stackoverflow and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Call for help: python3.5 testing

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 12:27 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > Hi all, > > I would like to make a push to get python3.5 stable in the next few > months. There are a couple things that need to happen first. > > 1. Add python3_5 to PYTHON_COMPAT for current ~arch packages. A list > of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On 07/08/2016 19:36, james wrote: >> The interesting apps out there are mostly running python, go and >> (sometimes) lua. And that's what I observe in my day job - >> business/mobile ISP. > > > Look at the job listing on stackoverflow and elsewhere (java) is very > popular when they list several

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 10:05:06 +0200 Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > app-admin/cpulimit Nice tool, I use it sometimes, so I'll take it. Best regards, Andrew Savchenko pgpO3kRrhnkEw.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: turning off grub2 multislot use flag

On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 08:28:32PM +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > It will require a lot of documentation updates (wiki, handbook etc) so I > wonder if you don't need symlinks for the grub2* names for a while even > so to ensure compatibility for a deprecation period. New users aren't >

Re: Easy Installs / Stage 4 ( Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs )

On 08/07/2016 11:55 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: Moving this to a higher visibility thread because I don't know how many people think such an intense discussion is happening in the tail of a package assignment . :P Most of my negativity/limitations are more about making sure we define where we

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: turning off grub2 multislot use flag

On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 12:39:28 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > > I feel that new installs don't need multislot since they won't be > migrating from grub legasy, so I want to turn the multislot flag off > in the grub2 ebuilds. > > Thoughts? Fine by me. The difference between us

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: turning off grub2 multislot use flag

On 08/07/2016 07:39 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I have spoken with floppym about this (he is the primary maintainer of > grub2), and he told me to go for it if I want to take on the project, so > I want some thoughts. > .. > > So, again, this would affect new installs, but users can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On 08/07/2016 12:49 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:47 PM, james wrote: On 08/07/2016 09:47 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: Sounds great. What's stopping you? Why Rich, thanks for the triple compliments; is that a vote that the basic idea(s) have merit, or

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph._serialize_tasks: improve runtime cycle handling (bug 590514)

On 08/07/2016 08:14 AM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > As usual, we are not resolver guru's, but the code changes look decent > enough :) > > LGTM > Thanks, pushed: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=6412205462671735f6e8b3196a780bc4b0d6a077 -- Thanks, Zac

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 1:47 PM, james wrote: > On 08/07/2016 09:47 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> >> Sounds great. What's stopping you? >> > > Why Rich, thanks for the triple compliments; is that a vote that the basic > idea(s) have merit, or sarcasm? > I'm just expressing that

[gentoo-dev] rfc: turning off grub2 multislot use flag

All, I have spoken with floppym about this (he is the primary maintainer of grub2), and he told me to go for it if I want to take on the project, so I want some thoughts. Currently, grub2 defaults, with the multislot use flag on, to renaming things away from upstream -- for example,

[gentoo-dev] Call for help: python3.5 testing

Hi all, I would like to make a push to get python3.5 stable in the next few months. There are a couple things that need to happen first. 1. Add python3_5 to PYTHON_COMPAT for current ~arch packages. A list of packages that need to be tested and marked compatible with python3.5 is producted

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 07 Aug 2016 11:44:35 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 7 sierpnia 2016 09:16:17 CEST, Pacho Ramos napisał(a): > >This packages are now up for grabs: > >app-arch/lzop > >dev-libs/check > >dev-libs/lzo > > I'll take those three. LZO fits nicely with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On 08/07/2016 11:21 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 12:24:37 -0500 james wrote: Let them use java* codes, as that is what all the universities are teaching and promoting. I agree with gentoo proper on severely restricting java*, on gentoo-proper, but that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On 08/07/2016 09:47 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:24 AM, james wrote: As a team, we could have a simple default program for a simple default disk format, and a variety of 'stage-4' images, maybe updated every 3 months, to get a gentoo system up, quickly.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On 08/07/2016 09:09 AM, Consus wrote: On 08:24 Sun 07 Aug, james wrote: On 08/07/2016 02:38 AM, Consus wrote: On 08:48 Sun 07 Aug, Michał Górny wrote: Sure we do. In the meantime, nobody uses gentoo anymore because it still can't deal with accepting contributions and in the meantime the few

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On 08/07/2016 09:06 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On 07/08/2016 15:32, Kent Fredric wrote: Let them use java* codes, as that is what all the universities are teaching and promoting. I agree with gentoo proper on severely restricting java*, on gentoo-proper, but that sort of thing is killing gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 12:24:37 -0500 james wrote: > >> Let them use java* codes, as that is what all the universities are > >> teaching and promoting. I agree > >> with gentoo proper on severely restricting java*, on > >> gentoo-proper, but that sort of thing is killing gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On 08/07/2016 08:32 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 08:24:51 -0500 james wrote: As a team, we could have a simple default program for a simple default disk format, and a variety of 'stage-4' images, maybe updated every 3 months, to get a gentoo system up,

[gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On 07/08/16 19:26, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > dev-util/gource I can take this one.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Empty project: Desktop

On 08/08/16 00:37, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El dom, 07-08-2016 a las 09:07 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió: >> [...] >> Well, that's easily remedied with an alias for the project that >> contains >> all the subprojects, no? >> > > But I don't know if the projects will like to behave in that way... >

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] depgraph._serialize_tasks: improve runtime cycle handling (bug 590514)

On Thu, 4 Aug 2016 21:33:59 -0700 Zac Medico wrote: > Previously, it was possible for _serialize_tasks to count some > dependencies of a runtime cycle as part of that cycle, leading to > sub-optimal merge order for these dependencies because they got > grouped together with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:24 AM, james wrote: > > As a team, we could have a simple default program for a simple default > disk format, and a variety of 'stage-4' images, maybe updated every 3 > months, to get a gentoo system up, quickly. Not an anything you want it to > be,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On 8/7/2016 10:06 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: I have no idea where James gets his information from, but I suspect it's a niche market where uni students do "clustering" - whatever that is. Many of the new frameworks/servers that are developed for running or managing clusters are written in Java,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: Desktop

El dom, 07-08-2016 a las 09:07 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió: > [...] > Well, that's easily remedied with an alias for the project that > contains > all the subprojects, no? > But I don't know if the projects will like to behave in that way... because freedesktop-bugs was behaving exactly in that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On 08:24 Sun 07 Aug, james wrote: > On 08/07/2016 02:38 AM, Consus wrote: > > On 08:48 Sun 07 Aug, Michał Górny wrote: > > > Sure we do. In the meantime, nobody uses gentoo anymore because it > > > still can't deal with accepting contributions and in the meantime the > > > few last developers

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On 07/08/2016 15:32, Kent Fredric wrote: >> Let them use java* codes, as that is what all the universities are >> > teaching and promoting. I agree >> > with gentoo proper on severely restricting java*, on gentoo-proper, >> > but that sort of thing is killing gentoo and just appears to the open

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On Sun, 7 Aug 2016 08:24:51 -0500 james wrote: > > As a team, we could have a simple default program for a simple default > disk format, and a variety of 'stage-4' images, maybe updated every 3 > months, to get a gentoo system up, quickly. Not an anything you want > it to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: Desktop

On 08/07/2016 06:34 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 10:29 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió: >> On 08/06/2016 04:31 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>> >>> Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Desktop >>> >>> Well, it seems that it's only "containing" other subprojects... but >>> I >>> am

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On 08/07/2016 02:38 AM, Consus wrote: On 08:48 Sun 07 Aug, Michał Górny wrote: Sure we do. In the meantime, nobody uses gentoo anymore because it still can't deal with accepting contributions and in the meantime the few last developers retired, and users long ago switched to the comparatively

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: Desktop

El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 09:07 -0700, Raymond Jennings escribió: > If an empty project has subprojects, I think that violates the > definition of empty. > Empty in the terms of previously having a maintainer taking care of it and now being "maintainer-needed"... I didn't think I would need to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Empty project: Desktop

El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 10:29 -0400, NP-Hardass escribió: > On 08/06/2016 04:31 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > > > Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Desktop > > > > Well, it seems that it's only "containing" other subprojects... but > > I > > am unsure if we really need it. Anyway, he is now

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

El sáb, 06-08-2016 a las 17:09 +0300, Andrew Savchenko escribió: > On Sat, 6 Aug 2016 13:37:19 + Peter Stuge wrote: > > > > Hi Pacho, many thanks for your work, but.. > > > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > > Pacho Ramos wrote: > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

Dnia 7 sierpnia 2016 09:16:17 CEST, Pacho Ramos napisał(a): >This packages are now up for grabs: >app-arch/lzop >dev-libs/check >dev-libs/lzo I'll take those three. LZO fits nicely with my other compression tools, and I think check is needed by one of my packages. -- Best

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On 08/07/2016 10:12 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote: > On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> This packages are now up for grabs: >> app-portage/euscan > > Patrick, > > Are you still keeping euscan running? > Yes. It's not in the best shape, but for now it works

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: net-p2p/dogecoin-qt 

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: app-portage/g-sorcery app-portage/gs-elpa app-portage/gs-pypi app-shells/rust-zshcomp app-vim/rust-mode dev-db/cppdb dev-db/soci sys-block/zram-init

[gentoo-dev] Empty project: LXDE

Now https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:LXDE is empty Feel free to join, anyway, if I don't misremember, LXDE is dead for a long time in favor of LXQT... in that case treecleaning the packages would also be an option Thanks

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:51 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > app-portage/euscan Patrick, Are you still keeping euscan running? Cheers, Dirkjan

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

On Sun, Aug 7, 2016 at 9:56 AM, Deven Lahoti wrote: > What's the policy on maintaining a package if I'm not (yet, hopefully) an > official dev? I'd like to take on transmission-remote-gtk since I use it > fairly often. That would be great! I think you want to start by looking at

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: app-admin/cpulimit net-misc/htpdate

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

What's the policy on maintaining a package if I'm not (yet, hopefully) an official dev? I'd like to take on transmission-remote-gtk since I use it fairly often. On Aug 7, 2016 03:41, "Pacho Ramos" wrote: > This packages are now up for grabs: > app-misc/sl > app-portage/epkg >

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: app-portage/euscan

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: app-misc/sl app-portage/epkg dev-libs/libmcs dev-libs/libmowgli-glib dev-libs/libmowgli media-sound/guimup media-video/miro net-irc/atheme-services net-irc/charybdis net-irc/shadowircd net-irc/unrealircd net-misc/quickshare net-p2p/transmission-remote-gtk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

On 08:48 Sun 07 Aug, Michał Górny wrote: > Sure we do. In the meantime, nobody uses gentoo anymore because it > still can't deal with accepting contributions and in the meantime the > few last developers retired, and users long ago switched to the > comparatively recent distribution of Debian

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: dev-util/ketchup

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: app-arch/lzop app-portage/repo-commit app-text/discount dev-lang/squirrel dev-libs/check dev-libs/liblist dev-libs/libstrl dev-libs/lzo dev-php/securimage dev-util/bin_replace_string dev-util/difffilter dev-util/geany-plugins dev-vcs/veracity net-irc/ultimate

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: dev-util/rpmdevtools sys-fs/simple-mtpfs

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

This packages are now up for grabs: app-misc/tmux-mem-cpu-load games-util/gtkevemon mail-filter/isbg media-fonts/montecarlo media-gfx/viewnior media-sound/pms net-misc/googlecl net-misc/wput www-client/uget www-misc/surl x11-libs/xosd x11-misc/dunst

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

Dnia 6 sierpnia 2016 23:12:55 CEST, Peter Stuge napisał(a): >Peter Stuge wrote: >> How can I help improve ..? > >Michał Górny wrote: >> people focused on preaching and/or implementing random crap-based >> solutions without even stopping for a few minutes to consider what >> we