Re: [gentoo-dev] Reproducing a bug found by the tinderbox

2016-09-05 Thread Andrew Savchenko
Hi, On Thu, 25 Aug 2016 00:47:44 +0200 Marc Popp wrote: > Hi All, > > sorry, if this has been asked or explained before, but google and the > gentoo wiki couldn't find any answers. > > I just got my first bug found by the tinderbox and would like to reproduce > the environment (chroot) that the

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Eclasses and EAPI

2016-09-05 Thread Duncan
Alexis Ballier posted on Mon, 05 Sep 2016 15:58:54 +0200 as excerpted: > On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 14:58:29 +0200 Michał Górny > wrote: > >> On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 11:20:29 +0200 Alexis Ballier >> wrote: >> >> > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 19:19:16 +0200 Kristian

RFC: New project Cinnamon (was Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for people willing to take care of Cinnamon)

2016-09-05 Thread Kristian Fiskerstrand
On 09/05/2016 04:45 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > On Wed, 2016-08-24 at 11:43 +0200, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: >> On 08/24/2016 11:26 AM, Pacho Ramos wrote: >>> Hello >>> >>> Most Gnome team member are not willing to keep maintaining cinnamon >>> ebuilds (specially since most of us are not even

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Eclasses and EAPI

2016-09-05 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 10:45:30 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 5:20 AM, Alexis Ballier > wrote: > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 19:19:16 +0200 > > Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > > >> On 09/02/2016 07:17 PM, Rich Freeman

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Eclasses and EAPI

2016-09-05 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 5:20 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 19:19:16 +0200 > Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > >> On 09/02/2016 07:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: >> > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Alexis Ballier >> > wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Eclasses and EAPI

2016-09-05 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 14:58:29 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 11:20:29 +0200 > Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 19:19:16 +0200 > > Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > > > > On 09/02/2016 07:17 PM, Rich Freeman

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Eclasses and EAPI

2016-09-05 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 18:13:20 +0200 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > I'm wondering whether it wouldn't make sense to require eclasses (or > strongly encourage) to include an explicit list of EAPIs it has been > tested for in order to ease testing when introducing new EAPIs. > > We

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Eclasses and EAPI

2016-09-05 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 11:20:29 +0200 Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 19:19:16 +0200 > Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > > > On 09/02/2016 07:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Alexis Ballier > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New no-lib-symlink profile for developers

2016-09-05 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 07:47:53 -0400 Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 07/09/2016 17:01, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hello, everyone. > > > > I've finally gotten around to wrapping up my multilib setup > > in a profile, and providing necessary patches to system packages > > to make it

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New no-lib-symlink profile for developers

2016-09-05 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 07/09/2016 17:01, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > I've finally gotten around to wrapping up my multilib setup > in a profile, and providing necessary patches to system packages > to make it possible to use it without having to hack their mistaken > logic around. > > The profile is

Re: [gentoo-dev] recommended way to get gcc-6 for testing packages

2016-09-05 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 08/31/2016 17:28, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: > I was looking at . > > gcc-6 doesn't seem to be in portage. > > Is there recommended way to get it installed? > > I'm also wondering what are the plans for adding it to portage. Why not > just add

[gentoo-dev] net-misc/iputils, why is the latest p'masked?

2016-09-05 Thread Joshua Kinard
So I am trying to make a stage3 run with catalyst for a MIPS-II/BE setup using sys-libs/uclibc-ng. Ran into a bit of a blocker with net-misc/iputils-20151218, which is the latest version that isn't masked. Specifically, the 'ping' utility will not build against uclibc-ng because of an undefined

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Eclasses and EAPI

2016-09-05 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 19:19:16 +0200 Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote: > On 09/02/2016 07:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Alexis Ballier > > wrote: > >> On Fri, 2 Sep 2016 18:13:20 +0200 > >> Kristian Fiskerstrand