[gentoo-dev] [warning] the bug queue has 82 bugs

Our bug queue has 82 bugs! If you have some spare time, please help assign/sort a few bugs. To view the bug queue, click here: http://bit.ly/m8PQS5 Thanks!

Re: [gentoo-dev] questions about small fixes/cleanups

On 09/19/2016 10:00 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > Kristian Fiskerstrand schrieb: >>> Why are those ebuilds not live? If upstream doesn't do real releases and >>> can't even be bothered to tag the commit that marks a release, then why >>> are you (or someone else) doing all this work?

Re: [gentoo-dev] questions about small fixes/cleanups

On Mon, 19 Sep 2016 00:51:37 -0700 Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 09/14/2016 06:21 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:45:58 -0400 > > Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > > >> On 09/14/2016 01:54 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>> > >>> We had a review

Re: [gentoo-dev] questions about small fixes/cleanups

Kristian Fiskerstrand schrieb: Why are those ebuilds not live? If upstream doesn't do real releases and can't even be bothered to tag the commit that marks a release, then why are you (or someone else) doing all this work? The snapshot scripts could be replaced by a live ebuild and upstream can

Re: [gentoo-dev] questions about small fixes/cleanups

On 09/19/2016 09:51 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > On 09/14/2016 06:21 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: >> On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:45:58 -0400 >> Michael Orlitzky wrote: .. >> > Why are those ebuilds not live? If upstream doesn't do real releases and > can't even be bothered to tag the

Re: [gentoo-dev] questions about small fixes/cleanups

On 09/14/2016 06:21 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 08:45:58 -0400 > Michael Orlitzky wrote: > >> On 09/14/2016 01:54 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >>> >>> We had a review of such files before the git conversion: >>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/550434 >>> >>> Especially,