Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: app-text/stardict and app-dicts/stardict*

2016-12-01 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 22:36:09 +0100 Pacho Ramos wrote: > # Pacho Ramos (27 Nov 2016) > # All stardict stuff and dicts are completely unmaintained and orphan > for > # years (#471350, #533632, #568472, #600718). Removal in a month. > app-dicts/stardict-cdict-en-zh-big5 >

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Cleanup. Remove die from global, scope per EAPI 6 rules

2016-12-01 Thread Mike Pagano
EAPI 6 prohibits dying in global scope. Move that check to pkg_setup. --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 8 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass index 547153c..91a24e9 100644 --- a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass +++

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Fix eapply_user as per PMS spec and execute in, src_prepare. Support older EAPIs with epatch_user.

2016-12-01 Thread Mike Pagano
On 11/30/2016 07:32 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > Round 3. As per mgorny's additional advice, fix eapply_user as per PMS > spec and execute in src_prepare. Support older EAPIs with epatch_user. > export src_prepare only for supported EAPI versions. mgorny, thanks for the feedback. Committed with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-12-01 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 12/01/2016 02:13 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote: > On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:50:42PM -0800, Daniel Campbell wrote: >> I completely agree that we should credit (and thank) contributors. I'm >> not sure if I'm doing things correctly, but when I'm dealing with a bug >> and users contribute patches or

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-12-01 Thread Andrey Utkin
On Thu, Dec 01, 2016 at 12:50:42PM -0800, Daniel Campbell wrote: > I completely agree that we should credit (and thank) contributors. I'm > not sure if I'm doing things correctly, but when I'm dealing with a bug > and users contribute patches or edits to ebuilds, I try to credit them > in my

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-12-01 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 11/30/2016 01:23 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote: > I'm quite sure this angry rant won't be pleasant to read for anybody, > but still I believe this post serves the good of Gentoo and this issue > is technical enough to be discussed on gentoo-dev. Also gentoo-pr list > seems retired anyway. > > This is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-12-01 Thread Andrey Utkin
Hi Matthew, Please take my deepest excuses for unjustly blaming you, now I see that my perception was plain wrong in being so blindly emotional. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 05:43:36PM -0600, Matthew Thode wrote: > While I did see your PR and bug if I remember correctly I didn't > actually use your

Re: [gentoo-dev] Simple crude tool to bump packages ebuild-bumper.sh

2016-12-01 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Thursday, December 1, 2016 12:12:27 PM EST William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > Do you find yourself with lots of related packages with the same version to > bump? > Do those package have a special order in which they need to be bumped? > > If those sound like problems you run into, then I have a

[gentoo-dev] Simple crude tool to make massive changes ebuild-batcher.sh

2016-12-01 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
Do you find yourself having to make a change to a lot of ebuilds? If that is something you face or have run into, then I have a simple crude tool for you called ebuild-batcher.sh[1]. A simple crude bash script that using an external file[2] that can modify ebuilds, files, etc across the entire

[gentoo-dev] Simple crude tool to bump packages ebuild-bumper.sh

2016-12-01 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
Do you find yourself with lots of related packages with the same version to bump? Do those package have a special order in which they need to be bumped? If those sound like problems you run into, then I have a simple crude tool for you called ebuild-bumper.sh[1]. A simple crude bash script that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-12-01 Thread james
On 11/30/2016 05:17 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Andrey Utkin wrote: I beg affiliated Gentoo developers to stay sane and be thinking not just about numbers of your commits, but also about community spirit and relationships. Of course

[gentoo-dev] Re: Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-12-01 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 01/12/16 09:33, Sam Jorna wrote: > On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 09:23:56PM +, Andrey Utkin wrote: >> The difference between my submission and final variant by Matthew is big >> in number of lines, but is trivial in content as you can see below, so I >> don't believe that Matthew has written his

Re: [gentoo-dev] Developer GitHub usernames

2016-12-01 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 11/30/2016 01:19 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 01:33:24 -0800 > Daniel Campbell wrote: > >> On 11/26/2016 01:08 AM, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Sat, 26 Nov 2016 00:03:59 -0800 >>> Daniel Campbell wrote: >>> A funny deficiency of

[gentoo-dev] Re: Please retain authorship of contributed patches

2016-12-01 Thread Michael Palimaka
On 01/12/16 10:27, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 17:17:16 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Andrey Utkin >> wrote: >>> >>> I beg affiliated Gentoo developers to stay sane and be thinking not just >>> about numbers of your