Re: [gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

On 01/10/2017 05:16 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 09-01-2017 09:08:22 +0100, Jan Stary wrote: >> The particular problem I am having is that http://mdocml.bsd.lv/ , >> my manpage formatter of choice, does deliberately not support bzip >> (or any other outside decompressors for that matter). > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

On 01/13/2017 08:06 AM, james wrote: > On 01/13/2017 02:45 AM, Sven Eden wrote: > >> Btw.: Even "embedded experts" wholeheartedly agree that they disagree >> what >> "embedded" actually is. But I do think SoCs actually *do* qualify, at >> least to >> some degree... > > > Huh? > > Probably who

Re: [gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 15:06:47 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > > the manpage formatter needs to call > > external unpackers. All this to save 40M. I honestly don't think > > it's worth it. > > Calling external tools in a pipeline is a pretty normal solution > in the *nix world.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stats: Gentoo developer commit timeline

On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:35:30AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Just a quick side project we've done a while ago. It's a timeline of > developer commit activity [1]. Code for data processing in [2]. I did > the data, Amynka prepared a nice JS to graph it. Nice work! Thanks, both mgorny and

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stats: Gentoo developer commit timeline

There is another http://www.seemantk.com/viz/gentoo/galaxy Want to see your activity, replace my name with yours http://www.seemantk.com/viz/gentoo/galaxy/?dev=wltjr -- William L. Thomson Jr. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stats: Gentoo developer commit timeline

On Mon, 16 Jan 2017 10:35:30 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > Just a quick side project we've done a while ago. It's a timeline of > developer commit activity [1]. Code for data processing in [2]. I did > the data, Amynka prepared a nice JS to graph it. Nice!

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stats: Gentoo developer commit timeline

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Michał Górny: > Hi, everyone. > > Just a quick side project we've done a while ago. It's a timeline > of developer commit activity [1]. Code for data processing in [2]. > I did the data, Amynka prepared a nice JS to graph it. > +1 - -- gokturk

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stats: Gentoo developer commit timeline

Hi Michał, > Just a quick side project we've done a while ago. It's a timeline of > developer commit activity [1]. Code for data processing in [2]. I did > the data, Amynka prepared a nice JS to graph it. That is very impressive and motivating. Thank you! Is it difficult to add the sum of active

Re: [gentoo-dev] bzipped manpages

On Jan 10 14:16:47, grob...@gentoo.org wrote: > On 09-01-2017 09:08:22 +0100, Jan Stary wrote: > > The particular problem I am having is that http://mdocml.bsd.lv/ , > > my manpage formatter of choice, does deliberately not support bzip > > (or any other outside decompressors for that matter). >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stats: Gentoo developer commit timeline

On 16/01/2017 10:35, Michał Górny wrote: > Just a quick side project we've done a while ago. It's a timeline of > developer commit activity [1]. Code for data processing in [2]. I did > the data, Amynka prepared a nice JS to graph it. > > [1]:http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/dev-timeline.html >

[gentoo-dev] Stats: Gentoo developer commit timeline

Hi, everyone. Just a quick side project we've done a while ago. It's a timeline of developer commit activity [1]. Code for data processing in [2]. I did the data, Amynka prepared a nice JS to graph it. This version is running purely on git + historical cvs->git conversion. Dates are done using

Re: USE=doc gnustep-make broken (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] package.use.mask / package.use.stable.mask priority)

Le Sat, 14 Jan 2017 20:03:02 +0100 David Haller a écrit: > gnustep-base/gnustep-make-2.6.8.ebuild is broken when built with USE=doc, > as it tries to install into the system, not the image. Easy fix: > > > diff -U7 -r a/gnustep-base/gnustep-make/gnustep-make-2.6.8.ebuild