Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: masking old versions of sys-devel/gcc

2017-04-25 Thread Francesco Riosa
2017-04-26 0:26 GMT+02:00 Andreas K. Huettel : > Am Sonntag, 23. April 2017, 14:35:48 CEST schrieb Michał Górny: > > Hi, > > > > I'm thinking of masking old versions of sys-devel/gcc, in particular > > older than the 4.9 branch. > > > > Masking is fine; some time later

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: masking old versions of sys-devel/gcc

2017-04-25 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Sonntag, 23. April 2017, 14:35:48 CEST schrieb Michał Górny: > Hi, > > I'm thinking of masking old versions of sys-devel/gcc, in particular > older than the 4.9 branch. > Masking is fine; some time later (maybe in a few months) I'd even suggest masking all of gcc-4. After all, unmasking

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] python-utils-r1.eclass: python_wrapper_setup, do not query PYTHON_CONFIG

2017-04-25 Thread Michał Górny
On pią, 2017-04-21 at 16:11 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Use plain 'pythonX.Y-config' executable name in the python-config > wrapper instead of querying the complete PYTHON_CONFIG path from > python_export. > > Constructing full PYTHON_CONFIG path requires querying ABIFLAGS which > requires the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/7] gnome2-utils.eclass: Make gnome2_icon_cache_update update all themes

2017-04-25 Thread Michał Górny
On pon, 2017-04-17 at 13:07 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Make the gnome2_icon_cache_update function update all icon themes rather > than depending on gnome2_icon_savelist to select themes to update. This > makes the function easier to use whenever the developer needs it > explicitly (i.e. knows

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/4] eutils.eclass: Remove implicit epunt-cxx inherit

2017-04-25 Thread Michał Górny
On pią, 2017-04-14 at 21:32 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Stop inheriting the epunt-cxx eclass in eutils implicitly. All the uses > in ::gentoo are fixed already, and this lets us add extra dependencies > in the eclass without affecting most of the packages out there. > --- > eclass/eutils.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: make_desktop_entry, replace unnecessary extglob

2017-04-25 Thread Michał Górny
On pią, 2017-04-14 at 19:25 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Replace the unnecessary use of extglob to strip file suffix > in make_desktop_entry with a plain ${x%.*}. This is pretty much > equivalent since match to one of the pre-defined suffixes is already > confirmed via the preceding conditional,

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: masking old versions of sys-devel/gcc

2017-04-25 Thread Francesco Riosa
On 25/04/2017 18:44, Guilherme Amadio wrote: On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:26:16AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 07:59:53PM +0200, Guilherme Amadio wrote: I would rather prefer to keep essential development tools in tree. GCC is not only used as system compiler, but also

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: masking old versions of sys-devel/gcc

2017-04-25 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:26:16AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 07:59:53PM +0200, Guilherme Amadio wrote: > > > > I would rather prefer to keep essential development tools in tree. > > GCC is not only used as system compiler, but also for development. > > I already had

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: masking old versions of sys-devel/gcc

2017-04-25 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 07:59:53PM +0200, Guilherme Amadio wrote: > > I would rather prefer to keep essential development tools in tree. > GCC is not only used as system compiler, but also for development. > I already had problems before with CMake being aggressively removed, > so I couldn't just

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] gnome2-utils.eclass: gnome2_query_immodules*, use EROOT, #611030

2017-04-25 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le samedi 22 avril 2017 à 23:03 +0200, Michał Górny a écrit : > On sob, 2017-04-22 at 13:43 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > > > On Sat, Apr 22, 2017 at 4:20 AM, Michał Górny > > wrote: > > > > > > Respect EROOT when running gtk-query-immodules-* tools, alike > > > other > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse use of Python/Ruby versions

2017-04-25 Thread Sergey Popov
09.04.2017 19:15, William L. Thomson Jr. пишет: > Not sure if this is practical, it may be less work if the use of > Python and Ruby versions ( maybe others ) is reversed. Rather than > adding all the versions that the ebuild supports. What if it only > included versions it did not support? It