Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] python-utils-r1.eclass: support PYTHON_IMPLS_NO_STRICT variable

2017-05-04 Thread Michał Górny
Dnia 4 maja 2017 22:34:56 CEST, Zac Medico napisał(a): >On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > >> This is intended to be set by the user when using ebuilds that may >> have unknown implementations in PYTHON_COMPAT. The assumption is >> that

[gentoo-dev] Re: meson.eclass second draft

2017-05-04 Thread Jonathan Callen
On 05/04/2017 07:48 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > here is meson.eclass after the changes from the first posting. > > Mgorny, I don't quite understand your question about the install command: > > DESTDIR="${ED}" eninja -v -c install > > I think it is ok, I don't think DESTDIR= has any

[gentoo-dev] Re: meson.eclass second draft

2017-05-04 Thread Jonathan Callen
On 05/04/2017 07:48 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > here is meson.eclass after the changes from the first posting. > > Mgorny, I don't quite understand your question about the install command: > > DESTDIR="${ED}" eninja -v -c install > > I think it is ok, I don't think DESTDIR= has any

[gentoo-dev] meson.eclass second draft

2017-05-04 Thread William Hubbs
All, here is meson.eclass after the changes from the first posting. Mgorny, I don't quite understand your question about the install command: DESTDIR="${ED}" eninja -v -c install I think it is ok, I don't think DESTDIR= has any bearing on EPREFIX. Here's the attachment. William # Copyright

Re: Getting gcc-6 keyworded (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry)

2017-05-04 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Donnerstag, 4. Mai 2017, 23:32:19 CEST schrieb Andreas K. Huettel: > OK since > > a) nobody from toolchain responds here, > b) a lot of people are in favour of doing this, but > c) noone wants to do it himself, and Forget this. William already did it. YAY!!! -- Andreas K. Hüttel

Getting gcc-6 keyworded (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry)

2017-05-04 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
OK since a) nobody from toolchain responds here, b) a lot of people are in favour of doing this, but c) noone wants to do it himself, and d) I dont have the time to do all the research I deem necessary to do it myself, let's harness the power of the developer community.

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-04 Thread Matthias Maier
> After the discussion on this thread (no one seemed to object), I went > ahead just now and added ~ keywords to sys-devel/gcc-6.3.0. Thanks a lot! Did you update any keywording bug (if one is open at all)? Best, Matthias signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-04 Thread William Hubbs
On Wed, May 03, 2017 at 11:43:11AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > Hey all, > > I am asking about this because I have been asked to look into > packaging software that has a specific requirement for >=gcc-6 in order > to build [1]. > > I see that gcc-6.3 doesn't have keywords, so I'm > wondering

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] python-utils-r1.eclass: support PYTHON_IMPLS_NO_STRICT variable

2017-05-04 Thread Zac Medico
On Tue, May 2, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > This is intended to be set by the user when using ebuilds that may > have unknown implementations in PYTHON_COMPAT. The assumption is > that the ebuilds are intended to be used within multiple contexts > which can involve

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla package list editing

2017-05-04 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 11:42 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > On Tue, 02 May 2017 14:32:13 +0200 > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >> > On Tue, 2 May 2017, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: >> >> > Also very common is that he changes fully qualified package names >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla package list editing

2017-05-04 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 02 May 2017 14:32:13 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Tue, 2 May 2017, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > > > Also very common is that he changes fully qualified package names > > (which is the correct syntax per [1]) into fully qualified package > > atoms

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla package list editing

2017-05-04 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Tue, 2 May 2017 13:05:38 +0200 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > One recent example of non-maintainer activity in the package list > field is bug 613104, where he just removed the entire package list > (and then marked the bug WONTFIX). I've been in desktop-misc@

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-04 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2017-05-03 21:25, Matthias Maier wrote: > Let's keyword gcc-6 and try to get gcc-7 into the tree on time. +1 -- Regards, Thomas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] new eclass: meson.eclass for the meson build system

2017-05-04 Thread Ilya Tumaykin
Hello. Why even bother with _set_build_dir() function? It's called only once and unconditionally. -- Best regards. Ilya Tumaykin. signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] new eclass: meson.eclass for the meson build system

2017-05-04 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Wed, 3 May 2017, William Hubbs wrote: > # @VARIABLE: mymesonargs I guess this is modeled after cmake-utils.eclass, but should eclass variables really use the "my" prefix? There seems to be no formal rule for this, but numerous devmanual examples (like MY_PV) suggest that MY is available

Re: [gentoo-dev] crossdev: installing _host_ build dependencies not automatic?

2017-05-04 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Wed, 3 May 2017 22:47:18 +0100 James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Wed, 3 May 2017 17:56:43 +0200 > Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 May 2017 12:05:48 +0200 > > "Paweł Hajdan, Jr." wrote: > > > > > I encountered

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-04 Thread Erik Närström
Portage pulls in gcc-5.4 when i run 'emerge -p pdftk'. /ekg On 4 May 2017 09:29, wrote: > On Wed, 3 May 2017, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: > >> On 03/05/17 01:58 PM, Luca Barbato wrote: >> >>> As I said few times, we should dump gcc-5 sooner than later and any >>> software that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: gcc-6.x status inquiry

2017-05-04 Thread grozin
On Wed, 3 May 2017, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: On 03/05/17 01:58 PM, Luca Barbato wrote: As I said few times, we should dump gcc-5 sooner than later and any software that does not build with gcc-6 should be p.masked and dropped from the tree if there isn't a nice fix for it. Just a heads-up,

Re: [gentoo-dev] new eclass: meson.eclass for the meson build system

2017-05-04 Thread Michał Górny
On śro, 2017-05-03 at 22:11 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > # Copyright 2017 Gentoo Foundation > # Distributed under the terms of the GNU General Public License v2 > > # @ECLASS: meson.eclass > # @MAINTAINER: > # William Hubbs > # @BLURB: common ebuild functions for