Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: www-client/phantomjs and dev-ruby/poltergeist
On Tue, 2017-06-06 at 21:11 +1200, Kent Fredric wrote: > > Just 30 days to overhaul things on top of other work is a serious > problem for anyone with time issues already. I've updated the proposed timeframe in the mask to 90 days. > ( I only consider my own use of this "amateur" at best right now, and > even with such a low usage I have a hard time working out what I need > to do to stay current, I'd hate to know what its like for people > relying on this in their production testing toolchain :/ ) As someone who used this in production we were already aware for some time that this was an issue. E.g. not getting updates when all other webkit packages did get updates was a clear indicator of future trouble. Hans signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] New 17.0 release profiles
Am Mittwoch, 7. Juni 2017, 22:44:31 CEST schrieb Andreas K. Huettel: > Hey all, > > as already discussed on IRC, here is a first step towards new 17.0 profile > sets. I havent seen any blocking disagreements / arguments, so I'm going to push the patches later today. -> The new profiles will NOT have any entries in profiles.desc yet. For "normal people" that means DO NOT SWITCH to these profiles yet. <- However, if you're involved with toolchain, languages, etc, already run gcc-6, and know what you're doing, feel free to adjust your profile symlink manually. You will have to rebuild all packages installing static archives because of the PIC flip. All testing is appreciated, as is writing of documentation. Just be advised to watch this list for news since THINGS MAY STILL CHANGE in weird and wonderful ways. As already stated, the new profiles will at earliest become "official" with the stabilization of gcc-6. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] New 17.0 release profiles
Am Donnerstag, 8. Juni 2017, 20:53:53 CEST schrieb Michał Górny: > I think it would also be reasonable to have clang default to the same > C++ standard for better interoperability. Makes sense. > > Sadly, unless I'm mistaken changing the defaults for both will require > patching the code. Just to clarify, I dont intend to patch anything in gcc or fiddle with any compiler flags. By masking all old gcc's I assume the ones left will have c++14 as default. -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
Re: [gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass: automatically move configure.in to configure.ac
On Sat, 10 Jun 2017 13:28:19 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426262
> + mv configure.{in,ac} || die
Looks good.
--
Sergei
pgpWrrfyNhK6s.pgp
Description: Цифровая подпись OpenPGP
[gentoo-dev] autotools.eclass: automatically move configure.in to configure.ac
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=426262diff --git a/eclass/autotools.eclass b/eclass/autotools.eclass
index 2710bf827b..76a5c2eade 100644
--- a/eclass/autotools.eclass
+++ b/eclass/autotools.eclass
@@ -341,10 +341,11 @@ eautoconf() {
echo
die "No configure.{ac,in} present!"
fi
- if [[ ${WANT_AUTOCONF} != "2.1" && -e configure.in ]] ; then
- eqawarn "This package has a configure.in file which has long been deprecated. Please"
- eqawarn "update it to use configure.ac instead as newer versions of autotools will die"
- eqawarn "when it finds this file. See https://bugs.gentoo.org/426262 for details."
+ if [[ ${WANT_AUTOCONF} != "2.1" && -e configure.in && ! -e configure.ac ]] ; then
+ eqawarn "This package has a configure.in file which has long been deprecated. Since no"
+ eqawarn "configure.ac is present either, we rename configure.in to configure.ac. If"
+ eqawarn "this causes problems, please file a bug report and make it block bug #426262."
+ mv configure.{in,ac} || die
fi
autotools_run_tool --at-m4flags autoconf "$@"
