Dear all,
The following packages are up for grabs:
dev-vcs/monotone
--
Best,
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, 7 Oct 2017 12:15:14 -0400
"Aaron W. Swenson" wrote:
> This reads kind of awkwardly. Maybe something along this lines of:
>
> This release brings several incompatible changes as a result of
> deprecations coming to term [#] and mitigating a potential
On 2017-10-07 17:03, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> …
> This release brings several incompatible changes, also as a
> consequence of fixing a security problem [1].
This reads kind of awkwardly. Maybe something along this lines of:
This release brings several incompatible changes as a result of
Am Samstag, 7. Oktober 2017, 17:21:13 CEST schrieb Kent Fredric:
> >
> > General purpose advice on updating Perl can be found on page [4]
>
Sounds good, added.
--
Andreas K. Hüttel
dilfri...@gentoo.org
Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)
signature.asc
Description: This is a
On Sat, 07 Oct 2017 17:03:44 +0200
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> See plaintext below and identical attached file.
>
>
> ===
> Title: Perl 5.26 update: possible breakage
> Author: Andreas K. Hüttel
> Posted:
See plaintext below and identical attached file.
===
Title: Perl 5.26 update: possible breakage
Author: Andreas K. Hüttel
Posted: xxx
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 2.0
Display-If-Installed: >=dev-lang/perl-5.26.0
You have just
Dear all,
The following packages are up for grabs:
app-text/aiksaurus
--
Best,
Jonas
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sat, Oct 07, 2017 at 01:56:39PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> Am Samstag, 7. Oktober 2017, 12:57:46 CEST schrieb Nils Holland:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > just a short question: Looking through the portage tree git logs, I
> > can see that yesterday, the new 17.0 profiles have been generated
Am Samstag, 7. Oktober 2017, 12:57:46 CEST schrieb Nils Holland:
> Hi folks,
>
> just a short question: Looking through the portage tree git logs, I
> can see that yesterday, the new 17.0 profiles have been generated for
> quite a few arches besides amd64 (where they have already existed for
> a
Hi folks,
just a short question: Looking through the portage tree git logs, I
can see that yesterday, the new 17.0 profiles have been generated for
quite a few arches besides amd64 (where they have already existed for
a while). However, it seems that for some arches, most notably x86,
the new
10 matches
Mail list logo