[gentoo-dev] We Are All wltjr On This Blessed Day

2017-12-02 Thread R0b0t1
19:09 @floppym | wltjr really seems to make shit up when he doen't know what he's talking about. 19:20@mgorny | lol 19:20@mgorny | we're talking about the real wltjr or the r0b0t1 fake identity? 19:21 @floppym | mgorny: There's a fake? 19:22@mgorny | didn't you

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists

2017-12-02 Thread R0b0t1
Hello, In every mailing list conversation, there are at least three people: the two conversing, and the future reader. I point this out as I think it important that everyone realize that not all posts are written for those immediately participating in the conversation. Some time ago I was

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists

2017-12-02 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, everyone. This is something that's been talked about privately a lot lately but it seems that nobody went forward to put things into motion. SO here's a proposal that aims to improve the condition of our mailing lists and solve some of the problems they are facing today. Problems

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: robbat2 edition

2017-12-02 Thread Kent Fredric
On Thu, 30 Nov 2017 18:19:23 + "Robin H. Johnson" wrote: > dev-perl/MogileFS-* On behalf of the Perl team I can keep this on life support till it ceases to be maintainable. ( And Perl is already on its maintainer list ) pgpsJ59UMf60E.pgp Description: OpenPGP digital

[gentoo-dev] 9 9 9 What Gentoo should be....

2017-12-02 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
Its from me, so it sucks, most can ignore, its spam, nothing useful, etc Feel free to TLDR; For those that decide to :) Netbeans 9, built under Java 9, running on Java 9 :) Like no where else! http://www.enlightenment.org/ss/e-5a20b8eb0b3e91.03603173.jpg

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles 17.0 hardened/no-multilib missing?

2017-12-02 Thread William L. Thomson Jr.
On Sat, 2 Dec 2017 16:13:47 -0500 Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > I'm not sure if anything is using that particular profile. I tried to > create a new subprofile myself, > > https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-hardened/message/ab7ef753aa88f21c8a05d667cf511a24 > > and wound up

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles 17.0 hardened/no-multilib missing?

2017-12-02 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
On 2 December 2017 at 23:08, Michał Górny wrote: > > W dniu sob, 02.12.2017 o godzinie 22∶43 +0200, użytkownik Alon Bar-Lev > napisał: > > Hi, > > Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib? > > I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added. > > > > One

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles 17.0 hardened/no-multilib missing?

2017-12-02 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 12/02/2017 03:43 PM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > Hi, > Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib? > I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added. > Thanks, > Alon > > [1] profiles/features/hardened/amd64/no-multilib > I'm not sure if anything is using that particular

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles 17.0 hardened/no-multilib missing?

2017-12-02 Thread Michał Górny
W dniu sob, 02.12.2017 o godzinie 22∶43 +0200, użytkownik Alon Bar-Lev napisał: > Hi, > Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib? > I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added. > One reason might be that: 1) there's barely any use for it, 2) we have too many profiles,

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles 17.0 hardened/no-multilib missing?

2017-12-02 Thread Nils Freydank
Am Samstag, 2. Dezember 2017, 21:43:53 CET schrieb Alon Bar-Lev: > Hi, > Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib? > I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added. > Thanks, > Alon > > [1] profiles/features/hardened/amd64/no-multilib Hi, one of the devs said in

[gentoo-dev] profiles 17.0 hardened/no-multilib missing?

2017-12-02 Thread Alon Bar-Lev
Hi, Any reason we do not publish hardened/no-multilib? I see we have[1] in place and is working if explicitly added. Thanks, Alon [1] profiles/features/hardened/amd64/no-multilib

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-vcs/qsvn

2017-12-02 Thread Michael Palimaka
# Michael Palimaka (02 Dec 2017) # Depends on dead Qt 4. Dead upstream. # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #639252. dev-vcs/qsvn