On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 4:14 PM, Elvis Pranskevichus wrote:
> On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 3:44:26 PM EST R0b0t1 wrote:
>> How easy is it to move patches to Gentoo infrastructure if the patches
>> are not provided by upstream? I am slightly uncomfortable with
>> everything being pushed to website
On 2017-12-19 21:44, R0b0t1 wrote:
> How easy is it to move patches to Gentoo infrastructure if the patches
> are not provided by upstream? I am slightly uncomfortable with
> everything being pushed to websites like GitHub by default.
Don't get me wrong but this a *dev* mailing list. Your statemen
# Patrice Clement (19 Dec 2017)
# A slightly better syntax file for PAM configuration files is shipped with Vim
# since version 8.0. The one we package is old and out of date.
# Masked for removal in 30 days. See bug 578278.
app-vim/pam-syntax
--
Patrice Clement
Gentoo Linux developer
http://www
On Tuesday, December 19, 2017 3:44:26 PM EST R0b0t1 wrote:
> How easy is it to move patches to Gentoo infrastructure if the patches
> are not provided by upstream? I am slightly uncomfortable with
> everything being pushed to websites like GitHub by default.
How are patches different from other di
And it would be nice to also recall the overlays, which can also use repoman
(and/or mgorny's travis hook for that), but at the same time have no
possibility to self-host the patches...
// well, I personally would prefer that repoman had an option to "ignore" some
(specified as an argument) of
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 3:33 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 12/17/17 19:39, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Hello, everyone.
>>>
>>> It's my pleasure to announce that with a majority vote the QA team has
>>> accepted a new policy. The accepted wordin
On 2017-12-17 14:21, Michał Górny wrote:
> Total size of 'files' subdirectory of a package should not be larger
> than 32 KiB. If the package needs more auxiliary files, they should
> be put into SRC_URI e.g. via tarballs.
I don’t have any strong opinions about this either way.
However, wha
On Tue, Dec 19, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> On 12/17/17 19:39, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> Hello, everyone.
>>>
>>> It's my pleasure to announce that with a majority vote the QA team has
>>> accepted a new policy. The accepted wordin
On 12/17/17 19:39, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 8:21 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> Hello, everyone.
>>
>> It's my pleasure to announce that with a majority vote the QA team has
>> accepted a new policy. The accepted wording is:
>>
>> Total size of 'files' subdirectory of a package
W dniu wto, 19.12.2017 o godzinie 09∶08 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller
napisał:
> > > > > > On Mon, 18 Dec 2017, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Display-If-Keyword: ~amd64
>
> Only keyword names [1] allowed there.
Fixed already. Though I'm thinking that it'd probably be better to use
Display-If-Profile
On Thu, 14 Dec 2017 16:04:17 -0600
R0b0t1 wrote:
> Can you be specific? Human memory is biased towards negative
> experiences. If it's hard to actually describe the multitude of issues
> that mixed systems cause then it is very likely mixed systems do not
> cause many issues.
We have mixed syste
13.12.2017 21:20, Lucas Ramage пишет:
> What about running a stable chroot? Are there any tools that can be
> used to automate this process?
Try gentoo-chrootiez[1], it is written by our fellow gentoo developer -
slyfox. And it is damn simple to use.
[1] - https://github.com/trofi/gentoo-chroot
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2017, Michał Górny wrote:
> Display-If-Keyword: ~amd64
Only keyword names [1] allowed there.
> multilib layout, and require explicit migration as described below. They
> are considered experimental at the moment, and have a fair risk
Your line wrapping has room for improvem
13 matches
Mail list logo