Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multiversion ebuilds

2018-05-12 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
On Saturday, May 12, 2018 5:20:30 AM PDT Gerion Entrup wrote: > Hi, > > just an idea for now. But what you think about multiversion ebuilds? > Technically this could be realized with the following line in the ebuild > itself: ``` > VERSIONS=( 3.0.11 3.0.12 3.1 ) > ``` You may also be interested

[gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly x11@ project status for May 2018

2018-05-12 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 4:49 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Matt Turner wrote: >> == Convert media-libs/mesa ebuild to build with Meson == >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/652762 >> >> Ebuild posted. Blocked on problems surrounding

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multiversion ebuilds

2018-05-12 Thread Dennis Schridde
On Saturday, 12 May 2018 16:36:13 CEST Gerion Entrup wrote: > Am Samstag, 12. Mai 2018, 16:21:26 CEST schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > > > On Sat, 12 May 2018, Gerion Entrup wrote: > > > - The size of the tree reduces. > > > > I very much doubt that (or at least it remains to be proven). > > > >

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-dns/dnssec-lookup, net-dns/dnssec-nodes, net-dns/dnssec-system-tray

2018-05-12 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (12 May 2018) # Depends on dead Qt4, upstream TRAC and SVN dead. No maint. response. # Masked for removal in 30 days, bugs #645418, #591866, #574244. net-dns/dnssec-lookup net-dns/dnssec-nodes net-dns/dnssec-system-tray

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multiversion ebuilds

2018-05-12 Thread Gerion Entrup
Am Samstag, 12. Mai 2018, 16:24:00 CEST schrieb R0b0t1: > On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Gerion Entrup wrote: > > - The size of the tree reduces. > > > > If this is a big concern you may be able to mount the portage tree > under a compressed loopback filesystem. It may

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multiversion ebuilds

2018-05-12 Thread Gerion Entrup
Am Samstag, 12. Mai 2018, 16:21:26 CEST schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > > On Sat, 12 May 2018, Gerion Entrup wrote: > > > just an idea for now. But what you think about multiversion ebuilds? > > Technically this could be realized with the following line in the > > ebuild itself: > > ``` > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multiversion ebuilds

2018-05-12 Thread R0b0t1
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 7:20 AM, Gerion Entrup wrote: > - The size of the tree reduces. > If this is a big concern you may be able to mount the portage tree under a compressed loopback filesystem. It may even be worth considering that as a recommended-by-handbook default

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multiversion ebuilds

2018-05-12 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Sat, 12 May 2018, Gerion Entrup wrote: > just an idea for now. But what you think about multiversion ebuilds? > Technically this could be realized with the following line in the > ebuild itself: > ``` > VERSIONS=( 3.0.11 3.0.12 3.1 ) > ``` > [...] > The advantages of this idea I see

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multiversion ebuilds

2018-05-12 Thread Gerion Entrup
Am Samstag, 12. Mai 2018, 15:47:57 CEST schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 8:20 AM Gerion Entrup > wrote: > > > > Different version keywording can be done as before: > > ``` > > if [[ ${PV} == "3.1" ]] ; then > > KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86" > > else > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] multiversion ebuilds

2018-05-12 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 8:20 AM Gerion Entrup wrote: > Different version keywording can be done as before: > ``` > if [[ ${PV} == "3.1" ]] ; then > KEYWORDS="~amd64 ~x86" > else > KEYWORDS="amd64 x86" > fi > ``` From a readability standpoint I could

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] multiversion ebuilds

2018-05-12 Thread Gerion Entrup
Hi, just an idea for now. But what you think about multiversion ebuilds? Technically this could be realized with the following line in the ebuild itself: ``` VERSIONS=( 3.0.11 3.0.12 3.1 ) ``` and the filename without version: //.ebuild together with this set of rules: 1. If there is an ebuild