Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Rethinking multilib flags in Gentoo

2019-05-07 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 2019-05-07 at 15:04 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 2:47 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > On the other hand, if I am consider the benefit of having large number > > of flags that will never benefit the majority of users (if anyone) > > vs. having much faster CI (= being able t

[gentoo-dev] Re: Rethinking multilib flags in Gentoo

2019-05-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 2:47 PM Michał Górny wrote: > On the other hand, if I am consider the benefit of having large number > of flags that will never benefit the majority of users (if anyone) > vs. having much faster CI (= being able to run it more frequently, > and therefore report problems fast

[gentoo-dev] Rethinking multilib flags in Gentoo

2019-05-07 Thread Michał Górny
Hiya. So far we reached 5 arches having multilib flags: x86, mips, ppc, riscv, s390 (note: ppc just retracted their multilib support but I've left it commented out for further consideration). Of those, only x86, mips and riscv actually ever had multilib profiles. In other words, the ABI flags fo

[gentoo-dev] gentoo-ci outage

2019-05-07 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, people. Since ~10 AM UTC today gentoo-ci does not work, so please take special care not to break stuff. So far I haven't been able to figure out what's wrong, and I can't put as much time into debugging it as I wish I could. If anyone would like to help, feel free to ping me. The last succe