On 8/7/19 11:20 AM, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mikle Kolyada
> ---
> As discussed with mgorny at #gentoo-qa
> glep-0081.rst | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/glep-0081.rst b/glep-0081.rst
> index 082e705..e5a4db2 100644
> --- a/glep-0081.rst
> +++
Due to the injection of $CTARGET and $CHOST in file path
we could end up with an already checked config file candidate
if $CTARGET or $CHOST isn't used.
This commit will make sure that we don't check the same file twice.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
eclass/savedconfig.eclass | 12
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
eclass/savedconfig.eclass | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/savedconfig.eclass b/eclass/savedconfig.eclass
index f62a6055ffdb..1ea464271aff 100644
--- a/eclass/savedconfig.eclass
+++ b/eclass/savedconfig.eclass
From: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Make save_config() re-use configuration file scheme used
by restore_config().
Fixes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/686348
Signed-off-by: Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
eclass/savedconfig.eclass | 40
On 2019-08-03 18:20, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Sat, 03 Aug 2019, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
>> +# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: _SAVEDCONFIG_CONFIGURATION_FILE
>
> 31 chars? Seems excessive for a name of a private variable.
And? I'll keep that name for readability instead of finding an
abbreviation.
On 2019-08-03 15:31, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> The summary line on this patch is too long. GLEP 66 states it must be
> no longer than 69 characters.
v2 will have summary line <=69 characters, thanks.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 12:02 PM Kent Fredric wrote:
>
> On Wed, 07 Aug 2019 17:55:21 +0200
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> > Plus, the eclasses explicitly allow KEYWORDS to be overridden by the
> > ebuild:
> >
> > : ${KEYWORDS:=alpha amd64 arm arm64 hppa ia64 m68k ~mips ppc ppc64 ~riscv
> > s390 sh
On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 13:29 -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> On 8/7/19 1:10 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Using '999' was also suggested (as the first dynamic
> > UID/GID) but it would cause issues for people enabling
> > ACCT_*_ENFORCE_ID. To avoid this, '-1' does not trigger collision
> > checks.
On 8/7/19 1:10 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Using '999' was also suggested (as the first dynamic
> UID/GID) but it would cause issues for people enabling
> ACCT_*_ENFORCE_ID. To avoid this, '-1' does not trigger collision
> checks.
>
Feel free to proceed with this, I'm just curious: what's the
Allow a special value of '-1' to dynamically assign UID/GID for the user
or group. This is intended to be used in overlays where proper
assignment does not take place but whose owners wish to switch to acct-*
packages.
While technically it is possible to choose a free UID/GID, it could be
taken
On Wed, 07 Aug 2019 17:55:21 +0200
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Plus, the eclasses explicitly allow KEYWORDS to be overridden by the
> ebuild:
>
> : ${KEYWORDS:=alpha amd64 arm arm64 hppa ia64 m68k ~mips ppc ppc64 ~riscv
> s390 sh sparc x86 ~ppc-aix ~x64-cygwin ~amd64-fbsd ~x86-fbsd ~amd64-linux
>
On 07.08.2019 18:49, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 18:20 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Mikle Kolyada
>> ---
>> As discussed with mgorny at #gentoo-qa
>> glep-0081.rst | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/glep-0081.rst b/glep-0081.rst
>>
On Wed, 7 Aug 2019 11:32:43 -0400
Brian Evans wrote:
> I object to this as I feel they can incorrect such as on prefix.
>
> Also, this goes against the established practice of committing directly
> to stable. These are exactly the same as virtuals as "they install
> nothing" and "just run a
> On Wed, 07 Aug 2019, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> +Both ``acct-group`` and ``acct-user`` eclasses have the ``KEYWORDS``
> +variable predefined, keywords must not be altered locally via ebuilds.
> +
GLEP 81 doesn't specify anything about the implementation. In fact,
it neither requires that it
On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 18:20 +0300, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mikle Kolyada
> ---
> As discussed with mgorny at #gentoo-qa
> glep-0081.rst | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/glep-0081.rst b/glep-0081.rst
> index 082e705..e5a4db2 100644
> --- a/glep-0081.rst
>
On Wed, 2019-08-07 at 11:32 -0400, Brian Evans wrote:
> On 8/7/2019 11:20 AM, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Mikle Kolyada
> > ---
> > As discussed with mgorny at #gentoo-qa
> > glep-0081.rst | 3 +++
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/glep-0081.rst
On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 13:41 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote:
> Hi Guys,
>
> Attaching. It seems for some reason if I inline the patches they don't
> come through. If I mail to myself only it works just fine.
>
Actually, I think it should be changed the other way around. I don't
see any reason to
On 07.08.2019 18:32, Brian Evans wrote:
> On 8/7/2019 11:20 AM, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Mikle Kolyada
>> ---
>> As discussed with mgorny at #gentoo-qa
>> glep-0081.rst | 3 +++
>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/glep-0081.rst b/glep-0081.rst
>> index
2019-08-07 18:33, Michael Orlitzky yazmış:
On 8/7/19 11:30 AM, Hasan ÇALIŞIR wrote:
+ACCT_USER_ID=495
+ACCT_USER_HOME=/var/lib/gvm
+ACCT_USER_HOME_OWNER=gvm:gvm
+ACCT_USER_GROUPS=( gvm )
The HOME_OWNER is redundant, that's the eclass default.
Will be fixed in PR.
Michael, do i need to
On 8/7/19 11:30 AM, Hasan ÇALIŞIR wrote:
> +ACCT_USER_ID=495
> +ACCT_USER_HOME=/var/lib/gvm
> +ACCT_USER_HOME_OWNER=gvm:gvm
> +ACCT_USER_GROUPS=( gvm )
The HOME_OWNER is redundant, that's the eclass default.
On 8/7/2019 11:20 AM, Mikle Kolyada wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Mikle Kolyada
> ---
> As discussed with mgorny at #gentoo-qa
> glep-0081.rst | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/glep-0081.rst b/glep-0081.rst
> index 082e705..e5a4db2 100644
> --- a/glep-0081.rst
> +++
As suggested by Michael Orlitzky,
I am updating my previous request for 'gvm' UID-GID_495 with 'nologin' instead
of 'bash' shell.
PR -> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12609
---
acct-group/gvm/gvm-0.ebuild | 10 ++
acct-group/gvm/metadata.xml | 12
2 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 acct-group/gvm/gvm-0.ebuild
create mode 100644 acct-group/gvm/metadata.xml
diff --git a/acct-group/gvm/gvm-0.ebuild b/acct-group/gvm/gvm-0.ebuild
---
acct-user/gvm/gvm-0.ebuild | 14 ++
acct-user/gvm/metadata.xml | 12
2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 acct-user/gvm/gvm-0.ebuild
create mode 100644 acct-user/gvm/metadata.xml
diff --git a/acct-user/gvm/gvm-0.ebuild b/acct-user/gvm/gvm-0.ebuild
Signed-off-by: Mikle Kolyada
---
As discussed with mgorny at #gentoo-qa
glep-0081.rst | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/glep-0081.rst b/glep-0081.rst
index 082e705..e5a4db2 100644
--- a/glep-0081.rst
+++ b/glep-0081.rst
@@ -107,6 +107,9 @@ a build time dependency
On 8/3/19 7:49 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
>
> That makes me think that we should set
>
> ACCT_USER_HOME=/var/lib/amavis
>
We'll do this during the next version/revision bump, keeping everything
else the same.
---
eclass/ssl-cert.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/ssl-cert.eclass b/eclass/ssl-cert.eclass
index b5b4250ef22..01783b75848 100644
--- a/eclass/ssl-cert.eclass
+++ b/eclass/ssl-cert.eclass
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ case "${EAPI:-0}" in
0)
I would like to reserve UID/GID 74 for dovenull (net-mail/dovecot).
Arch also uses uid 74 for dovenull while Redhat uses next available.
--
Eray
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I would like to reserve UID/GID 76 for dovecot (net-mail/dovecot)
This id differs from what we have provided historically (97) but gid/97
is used by acct-group/input. So use 76 instead.
This id is the same in Arch (76) but differs from Redhat (97).
--
Eray
signature.asc
Description: PGP
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 10:59:48AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Historically dovecot came first, but OTOH the ID was added to baselayout
> five years ago, and changing baselayout requires some effort. So I'd
> suggest to change dovecot.
>
> The UIDs and GIDs used by Arch might be good:
>
> On Wed, 07 Aug 2019, Eray Aslan wrote:
> So do we ask acct-group/input to change their GID? why add an already
> used fixed gid to baselayout in the first place (and one that is used on
> other distros as well)? whats the thinking here?
> or we can change dovecot uid/gid. I dont mind but
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 11:32:48AM +0300, Alexander Tsoy wrote:
> В Ср, 07/08/2019 в 09:29 +0300, Eray Aslan пишет:
> > I would like to reserve UID/GID 97 for dovecot (net-mail/dovecot)
>
> This GID is currently used by the input group (sys-apps/baselayout and
> acct-group/input).
>
>
В Ср, 07/08/2019 в 09:29 +0300, Eray Aslan пишет:
> I would like to reserve UID/GID 97 for dovecot (net-mail/dovecot)
This GID is currently used by the input group (sys-apps/baselayout and
acct-group/input).
https://bugs.gentoo.org/688390
>
> This fixed ID is what we have provided historically
> On Wed, 07 Aug 2019, Eray Aslan wrote:
> I would like to reserve UID/GID 484 for dovenull (net-mail/dovecot).
> Arch uses uid 74 for dovenull while Redhat uses next available.
Wouldn't it make sense to keep dovecot and dovenull together, i.e. use
97 for dovecot and 98 for dovenull?
I would like to reserve UID/GID 484 for dovenull (net-mail/dovecot).
Arch uses uid 74 for dovenull while Redhat uses next available.
--
Eray
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I would like to reserve UID/GID 97 for dovecot (net-mail/dovecot)
This fixed ID is what we have provided historically and is the same as
RedHat but differs from Arch (76).
--
Eray
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I would like to reserve GID 208 for postdrop (mail-mta/postfix)
This fixed ID is what we have provided historically and differs from
Arch (75) and RedHat (90).
--
Eray
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
I would like to reserve UID/GID 207 for postfix (mail-mta/postfix).
This fixed ID is what we have provided historically and differs from
Arch (73) and RedHat (89).
--
Eray
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
38 matches
Mail list logo
