Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for i2pd (170)

2019-08-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 8/9/19 6:42 PM, Alexey I. Korepanov wrote: > I wanted also to remove write access for i2pd group for config files in > /etc, thus extra removal. I wrote about it in the pr. >   Ah, sorry, I only read the commit and not the PR conversation. Is the group still used for anything?

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for i2pd (170)

2019-08-09 Thread Alexey I . Korepanov
I wanted also to remove write access for i2pd group for config files in /etc, thus extra removal. I wrote about it in the pr. 09.08.2019, 23:38, "Michael Orlitzky" :On 8/9/19 5:59 PM, Alexey I. Korepanov wrote: Hi!   I need a UID/GID for i2pd. I used 170 in 

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for i2pd (170)

2019-08-09 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On 8/9/19 5:59 PM, Alexey I. Korepanov wrote: > Hi! >   > I need a UID/GID for i2pd. I used 170 in > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12509 > I did not find any conflict. >   > You deleted your entire pkg_preinst phase, but you probably only wanted to delete the enewuser and enewgroup calls.

[gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for i2pd (170)

2019-08-09 Thread Alexey I . Korepanov
Hi! I need a UID/GID for i2pd. I used 170 in https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12509I did not find any conflict. Best, Alexey

[gentoo-dev] qmail.eclass: 2 bugfixes

2019-08-09 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Also in GitHub as https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12632 and https:// github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12631. I have not seen any qmail patch every modifying makelib, so the change is rather direct in contrast to the compiler settings in the same function. To verify the man change look at the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: UID/GID assignment for logstash (270)

2019-08-09 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 3:31 PM Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 8/8/19 3:37 AM, Tomas Mozes wrote: > > > > Pending PR: > > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/12375 > > > > Is the group-writability really needed here? > > > ACCT_USER_HOME_PERMS=0770 > > I don't think the existing ebuilds change